异丙酚的脑电图快速活动是剂量依赖性的

Chloe B.H. Asato, Erica Y. Shin, Anna K. Gragas, Keith K. Abe, Loren G. Yamamoto
{"title":"异丙酚的脑电图快速活动是剂量依赖性的","authors":"Chloe B.H. Asato, Erica Y. Shin, Anna K. Gragas, Keith K. Abe, Loren G. Yamamoto","doi":"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: For patients with a first-time suspected seizure, electroencephalograms (EEG) are part of the initial evaluation. Most sedatives result in EEG artifact “fast activity” (FA), making the EEG difficult to read. During propofol-sedated EEGs, we noticed that FA would diminish when the propofol infusion rate was low. The purpose of this study is to investigate propofol dosing and its relationship to EEG FA artifact. Methods: This study involved retrospective chart reviews of a pediatric database for sedated EEG encounters in patients under 7 years of age. Data was collected from a total of 55 charts. Total doses of propofol (mg/kg/hr) were calculated for the first half and second half. The actual EEGs were reviewed by a pediatric neurologist study investigator, to classify the degree of FA as: none, mild, moderate, severe. We then examined whether total doses of propofol given during the EEG (mg/kg/hr) halves affected the severity of FA using ordinal logistic regression. Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively). Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively).","PeriodicalId":382758,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Paediatrics","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propofol’s EEG Fast Activity is Dose-Dependent\",\"authors\":\"Chloe B.H. Asato, Erica Y. Shin, Anna K. Gragas, Keith K. Abe, Loren G. Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: For patients with a first-time suspected seizure, electroencephalograms (EEG) are part of the initial evaluation. Most sedatives result in EEG artifact “fast activity” (FA), making the EEG difficult to read. During propofol-sedated EEGs, we noticed that FA would diminish when the propofol infusion rate was low. The purpose of this study is to investigate propofol dosing and its relationship to EEG FA artifact. Methods: This study involved retrospective chart reviews of a pediatric database for sedated EEG encounters in patients under 7 years of age. Data was collected from a total of 55 charts. Total doses of propofol (mg/kg/hr) were calculated for the first half and second half. The actual EEGs were reviewed by a pediatric neurologist study investigator, to classify the degree of FA as: none, mild, moderate, severe. We then examined whether total doses of propofol given during the EEG (mg/kg/hr) halves affected the severity of FA using ordinal logistic regression. Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively). Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively).\",\"PeriodicalId\":382758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SVOA Paediatrics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SVOA Paediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于首次怀疑癫痫发作的患者,脑电图(EEG)是初步评估的一部分。大多数镇静剂导致脑电信号伪影“快速活动”(FA),使脑电信号难以读取。在异丙酚镇静的脑电图中,我们注意到当异丙酚输注率较低时,FA会减少。本研究的目的是探讨异丙酚剂量及其与脑电图FA伪影的关系。方法:本研究涉及对儿童数据库中7岁以下患者镇静脑电图的回顾性分析。数据收集自55个图表。计算前半段和后半段异丙酚总剂量(mg/kg/hr)。实际的脑电图由一名儿科神经学家研究人员检查,将FA的程度分为:无、轻度、中度、重度。然后,我们使用有序逻辑回归检查脑电图期间给予的异丙酚总剂量(mg/kg/hr)一半是否影响FA的严重程度。结果:表1总结了结果,其中异丙酚剂量(配对t检验,p<0.001)和EEG FA(鲍克对称检验,p=0.002)在前半部分高于后半部分。图1独立绘制了每个数据点的图,通过线性和有序逻辑回归显示异丙酚剂量与FA严重程度之间呈正相关(p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34)。结果:表1总结了结果,其中异丙酚剂量(配对t检验,p<0.001)和EEG FA(鲍克对称检验,p=0.002)在前半部分高于后半部分。图1独立绘制了每个数据点的图,通过线性和有序逻辑回归显示异丙酚剂量与FA严重程度之间呈正相关(p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Propofol’s EEG Fast Activity is Dose-Dependent
Introduction: For patients with a first-time suspected seizure, electroencephalograms (EEG) are part of the initial evaluation. Most sedatives result in EEG artifact “fast activity” (FA), making the EEG difficult to read. During propofol-sedated EEGs, we noticed that FA would diminish when the propofol infusion rate was low. The purpose of this study is to investigate propofol dosing and its relationship to EEG FA artifact. Methods: This study involved retrospective chart reviews of a pediatric database for sedated EEG encounters in patients under 7 years of age. Data was collected from a total of 55 charts. Total doses of propofol (mg/kg/hr) were calculated for the first half and second half. The actual EEGs were reviewed by a pediatric neurologist study investigator, to classify the degree of FA as: none, mild, moderate, severe. We then examined whether total doses of propofol given during the EEG (mg/kg/hr) halves affected the severity of FA using ordinal logistic regression. Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively). Results: The results are summarized in Table 1, which shows that propofol doses (paired T-test, p<0.001) and EEG FA (Bowker’s test of symmetry, p=0.002) were higher in the first half compared to the second half. Figure 1 graphs each data point independently, which shows via linear and ordinal logistic regression a positive relationship between propofol dosing and FA severity (p=0.0014, OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.08-1.34, respectively).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信