先发制人与预防性镇痛对术后疼痛:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Aida Rosita Tantri, Riyadh Firdaus, Hansen Angkasa, Ahmad Pasha Natanegara, Muhammad A. I. Maulana
{"title":"先发制人与预防性镇痛对术后疼痛:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Aida Rosita Tantri, Riyadh Firdaus, Hansen Angkasa, Ahmad Pasha Natanegara, Muhammad A. I. Maulana","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.227-239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPostoperative pain is a type of nociceptive pain that originates from tissue damage due to trauma caused by surgery. Pre-emptive analgesia is treatment that starts before surgery, to prevent or reduce the establishment of sensitization of dorsal horn neurons caused by tissue injury, the sensitized neurons being supposed to amplify postoperative pain. Pre-emptive analgesia consists of administering analgesic medication before tissue injury, that is, before the reception, transmission, modulation, and nociception of the aggressive stimulus, aiming to prevent hyperalgesia. This review aims to compare the efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia and preventive analgesia in postoperative pain. MethodsArticle searching was done on five databases (PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey). Hand-searching was also done to find additional articles. We have only included double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCT). A total of fifteen articles were included and all were RCT studies comparing pre-emptive analgesia with preventive analgesia. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. ResultsFifteen studies comprising 830 subjects were included in this study. Our analysis revealed that pre-emptive analgesia significantly improved visual analog scale (VAS)/numeric rating scale (NRS)/verbal rating scale (VRS) 4 hours postoperatively [mean difference (MD) = -0.25, 95% CI: [- 0.49, -0.02]; I2 = 94%]. Unfortunately, pain scoring at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery did not differ significantly between pre-emptive and preventive analgesia. Duration of analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Time to rescue analgesics was similar between the two groups, but the pre-emptive group was associated with less analgesic consumption postoperatively than the preventive group. ConclusionPre-emptive analgesia provided better pain relief than preventive analgesia during the short term. Time to rescue analgesics is comparable between both groups, but pre-emptive analgesia is associated with lower amounts of rescue analgesics postoperatively.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-emptive versus preventive analgesia for postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aida Rosita Tantri, Riyadh Firdaus, Hansen Angkasa, Ahmad Pasha Natanegara, Muhammad A. I. Maulana\",\"doi\":\"10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.227-239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundPostoperative pain is a type of nociceptive pain that originates from tissue damage due to trauma caused by surgery. Pre-emptive analgesia is treatment that starts before surgery, to prevent or reduce the establishment of sensitization of dorsal horn neurons caused by tissue injury, the sensitized neurons being supposed to amplify postoperative pain. Pre-emptive analgesia consists of administering analgesic medication before tissue injury, that is, before the reception, transmission, modulation, and nociception of the aggressive stimulus, aiming to prevent hyperalgesia. This review aims to compare the efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia and preventive analgesia in postoperative pain. MethodsArticle searching was done on five databases (PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey). Hand-searching was also done to find additional articles. We have only included double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCT). A total of fifteen articles were included and all were RCT studies comparing pre-emptive analgesia with preventive analgesia. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. ResultsFifteen studies comprising 830 subjects were included in this study. Our analysis revealed that pre-emptive analgesia significantly improved visual analog scale (VAS)/numeric rating scale (NRS)/verbal rating scale (VRS) 4 hours postoperatively [mean difference (MD) = -0.25, 95% CI: [- 0.49, -0.02]; I2 = 94%]. Unfortunately, pain scoring at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery did not differ significantly between pre-emptive and preventive analgesia. Duration of analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Time to rescue analgesics was similar between the two groups, but the pre-emptive group was associated with less analgesic consumption postoperatively than the preventive group. ConclusionPre-emptive analgesia provided better pain relief than preventive analgesia during the short term. Time to rescue analgesics is comparable between both groups, but pre-emptive analgesia is associated with lower amounts of rescue analgesics postoperatively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universa Medicina\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universa Medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.227-239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2023.v42.227-239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景术后疼痛是一种伤害性疼痛,源于手术造成的创伤引起的组织损伤。先发制人的镇痛是在手术前开始的治疗,以防止或减少组织损伤引起的背角神经元敏化的建立,认为敏化的神经元会放大术后疼痛。先发制人性镇痛是指在组织损伤前,即在攻击性刺激的接受、传递、调节和伤害感受前给予镇痛药物,以防止痛觉过敏。本综述旨在比较先发制人镇痛和预防性镇痛对术后疼痛的疗效。方法在PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus、ScienceDirect、ClinicalKey等5个数据库中进行检索。还进行了手工搜索以查找其他文章。我们只纳入了双盲、随机对照试验(RCT)。共纳入15篇文章,均为比较先发制人镇痛与预防性镇痛的RCT研究。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估。定量分析由评审经理5.4进行。结果共纳入15项研究,830名受试者。我们的分析显示,先发制人镇痛可显著改善术后4小时视觉模拟量表(VAS)/数值评定量表(NRS)/言语评定量表(VRS)[平均差值(MD) = -0.25, 95% CI: [- 0.49, -0.02];I2 = 94%]。不幸的是,手术后6、12和24小时的疼痛评分在先发制人和预防性镇痛之间没有显著差异。两组之间的镇痛持续时间具有可比性。两组镇痛药抢救时间相似,但先发制人组术后镇痛药用量低于预防组。结论在短期内,预防性镇痛优于预防性镇痛。两组间的镇痛时间相当,但先发制人镇痛与术后较低的镇痛剂量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pre-emptive versus preventive analgesia for postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundPostoperative pain is a type of nociceptive pain that originates from tissue damage due to trauma caused by surgery. Pre-emptive analgesia is treatment that starts before surgery, to prevent or reduce the establishment of sensitization of dorsal horn neurons caused by tissue injury, the sensitized neurons being supposed to amplify postoperative pain. Pre-emptive analgesia consists of administering analgesic medication before tissue injury, that is, before the reception, transmission, modulation, and nociception of the aggressive stimulus, aiming to prevent hyperalgesia. This review aims to compare the efficacy of pre-emptive analgesia and preventive analgesia in postoperative pain. MethodsArticle searching was done on five databases (PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey). Hand-searching was also done to find additional articles. We have only included double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (RCT). A total of fifteen articles were included and all were RCT studies comparing pre-emptive analgesia with preventive analgesia. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4. ResultsFifteen studies comprising 830 subjects were included in this study. Our analysis revealed that pre-emptive analgesia significantly improved visual analog scale (VAS)/numeric rating scale (NRS)/verbal rating scale (VRS) 4 hours postoperatively [mean difference (MD) = -0.25, 95% CI: [- 0.49, -0.02]; I2 = 94%]. Unfortunately, pain scoring at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery did not differ significantly between pre-emptive and preventive analgesia. Duration of analgesia was comparable between the two groups. Time to rescue analgesics was similar between the two groups, but the pre-emptive group was associated with less analgesic consumption postoperatively than the preventive group. ConclusionPre-emptive analgesia provided better pain relief than preventive analgesia during the short term. Time to rescue analgesics is comparable between both groups, but pre-emptive analgesia is associated with lower amounts of rescue analgesics postoperatively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信