药物与化学品

None Michael McCoy
{"title":"药物与化学品","authors":"None Michael McCoy","doi":"10.1021/cen-10137-editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most of the 9 years that C&EN has published its 10 Start-Ups to Watch feature—which appears this week on page 16—we’ve assessed drug and materials companies by separate financial standards. Start-ups focused on drugs typically raise much more money than materials firms in series A or other early funding rounds. For example, Alltrna, one of the three drug discovery firms we profiled last year, had $50 million in investor funding when it launched in 2021. The other two each raked in $100 million or more in their early investment rounds. By contrast, the chemical, agricultural, and clean technology start-ups we profiled were lucky to hit $30 million in their series A investment rounds, the stage in which companies typically transition from a promising concept to a full-fledged business. Sure, 10 companies are a small sample. But figures from the venture capital data firm PitchBook point to the same dichotomy.","PeriodicalId":9517,"journal":{"name":"C&EN Global Enterprise","volume":"68 31","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drugs versus chemicals\",\"authors\":\"None Michael McCoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/cen-10137-editorial\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most of the 9 years that C&EN has published its 10 Start-Ups to Watch feature—which appears this week on page 16—we’ve assessed drug and materials companies by separate financial standards. Start-ups focused on drugs typically raise much more money than materials firms in series A or other early funding rounds. For example, Alltrna, one of the three drug discovery firms we profiled last year, had $50 million in investor funding when it launched in 2021. The other two each raked in $100 million or more in their early investment rounds. By contrast, the chemical, agricultural, and clean technology start-ups we profiled were lucky to hit $30 million in their series A investment rounds, the stage in which companies typically transition from a promising concept to a full-fledged business. Sure, 10 companies are a small sample. But figures from the venture capital data firm PitchBook point to the same dichotomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C&EN Global Enterprise\",\"volume\":\"68 31\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C&EN Global Enterprise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10137-editorial\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C&EN Global Enterprise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10137-editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

9年来,C&EN发布了10家值得关注的初创企业专题(本周将出现在第16页),在这9年的大部分时间里,我们用不同的财务标准来评估制药和材料公司。在A轮或其他早期融资中,专注于药品的初创企业通常比材料公司筹集到更多的资金。例如,我们去年介绍的三家药物研发公司之一的Alltrna,在2021年成立时获得了5000万美元的投资者资金。另外两家公司在早期投资中都获得了1亿美元或更多的资金。相比之下,我们介绍的化工、农业和清洁技术初创企业在A轮投资中幸运地获得了3000万美元,在这一阶段,公司通常会从一个有前景的概念转变为一个成熟的企业。当然,10家公司只是一个小样本。但风险投资数据公司PitchBook的数据也指向了同样的两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drugs versus chemicals
For most of the 9 years that C&EN has published its 10 Start-Ups to Watch feature—which appears this week on page 16—we’ve assessed drug and materials companies by separate financial standards. Start-ups focused on drugs typically raise much more money than materials firms in series A or other early funding rounds. For example, Alltrna, one of the three drug discovery firms we profiled last year, had $50 million in investor funding when it launched in 2021. The other two each raked in $100 million or more in their early investment rounds. By contrast, the chemical, agricultural, and clean technology start-ups we profiled were lucky to hit $30 million in their series A investment rounds, the stage in which companies typically transition from a promising concept to a full-fledged business. Sure, 10 companies are a small sample. But figures from the venture capital data firm PitchBook point to the same dichotomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信