Zahran Abd Elnaby, Amal Zaher, Ragab K. Abdel-Magied, Heba I. Elkhouly
{"title":"通过集成六西格玛和机器学习技术改进塑料制造工艺:一个案例研究","authors":"Zahran Abd Elnaby, Amal Zaher, Ragab K. Abdel-Magied, Heba I. Elkhouly","doi":"10.1080/21681015.2023.2260384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis research integrates machine learning (ML) and Six Sigma’s Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) methodology to address these issues. The study details the selection and utilization of ML techniques, including Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Cluster Analysis (CA). Implemented at the Innovative Plastic Manufacturing Company in Egypt, this research enhances the consistency of plastic bottle production by addressing issues such as surface marks, flashes, bubbles, and variations in liter capacity. Integrating Six Sigma with ML techniques reduces the average defect rate from approximately 67.8%. It elevates the Sigma level from 3.14 to 4.30, reducing material over-consumption costs from 5% to 1.7% of total manufacturing expenses. Notably, the KNN model achieves the best results for defect testing, with an R-squared value of 98.8%. These methodologies lead to cost reduction, increased competitiveness, and improved product quality when implemented.KEYWORDS: Six Sigmaqualityplastic manufacturingmachine learningDMAICvariabilityplastic fittings Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Abbreviation PET=Polyethylene terephthalateLSS=Lean Six SigmaML=Machine LearningKNN=k-nearest neighborsDL=deep learningAI=Artificial intelligenceBPNN=back-propagation neural networkSVR=support vector regressionPSO=algorithm to optimize the process parametersDMAIC=Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and ControlSIPOC=Suppliers, Input, Process, Output,CustomerDPMO=defects per million opportunitiesPCA=principal component analysisPCIs=process capability indicesDPO=Defects per OpportunityPPM=Parts per MillionLR=Linear regressionDT=Decision treesCA=Cluster Analysis","PeriodicalId":16024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving plastic manufacturing processes with the integration of Six Sigma and machine learning techniques: a case study\",\"authors\":\"Zahran Abd Elnaby, Amal Zaher, Ragab K. Abdel-Magied, Heba I. Elkhouly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681015.2023.2260384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis research integrates machine learning (ML) and Six Sigma’s Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) methodology to address these issues. The study details the selection and utilization of ML techniques, including Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Cluster Analysis (CA). Implemented at the Innovative Plastic Manufacturing Company in Egypt, this research enhances the consistency of plastic bottle production by addressing issues such as surface marks, flashes, bubbles, and variations in liter capacity. Integrating Six Sigma with ML techniques reduces the average defect rate from approximately 67.8%. It elevates the Sigma level from 3.14 to 4.30, reducing material over-consumption costs from 5% to 1.7% of total manufacturing expenses. Notably, the KNN model achieves the best results for defect testing, with an R-squared value of 98.8%. These methodologies lead to cost reduction, increased competitiveness, and improved product quality when implemented.KEYWORDS: Six Sigmaqualityplastic manufacturingmachine learningDMAICvariabilityplastic fittings Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Abbreviation PET=Polyethylene terephthalateLSS=Lean Six SigmaML=Machine LearningKNN=k-nearest neighborsDL=deep learningAI=Artificial intelligenceBPNN=back-propagation neural networkSVR=support vector regressionPSO=algorithm to optimize the process parametersDMAIC=Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and ControlSIPOC=Suppliers, Input, Process, Output,CustomerDPMO=defects per million opportunitiesPCA=principal component analysisPCIs=process capability indicesDPO=Defects per OpportunityPPM=Parts per MillionLR=Linear regressionDT=Decision treesCA=Cluster Analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":16024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2023.2260384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2023.2260384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving plastic manufacturing processes with the integration of Six Sigma and machine learning techniques: a case study
ABSTRACTThis research integrates machine learning (ML) and Six Sigma’s Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) methodology to address these issues. The study details the selection and utilization of ML techniques, including Linear Regression (LR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree (DT), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Cluster Analysis (CA). Implemented at the Innovative Plastic Manufacturing Company in Egypt, this research enhances the consistency of plastic bottle production by addressing issues such as surface marks, flashes, bubbles, and variations in liter capacity. Integrating Six Sigma with ML techniques reduces the average defect rate from approximately 67.8%. It elevates the Sigma level from 3.14 to 4.30, reducing material over-consumption costs from 5% to 1.7% of total manufacturing expenses. Notably, the KNN model achieves the best results for defect testing, with an R-squared value of 98.8%. These methodologies lead to cost reduction, increased competitiveness, and improved product quality when implemented.KEYWORDS: Six Sigmaqualityplastic manufacturingmachine learningDMAICvariabilityplastic fittings Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Abbreviation PET=Polyethylene terephthalateLSS=Lean Six SigmaML=Machine LearningKNN=k-nearest neighborsDL=deep learningAI=Artificial intelligenceBPNN=back-propagation neural networkSVR=support vector regressionPSO=algorithm to optimize the process parametersDMAIC=Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and ControlSIPOC=Suppliers, Input, Process, Output,CustomerDPMO=defects per million opportunitiesPCA=principal component analysisPCIs=process capability indicesDPO=Defects per OpportunityPPM=Parts per MillionLR=Linear regressionDT=Decision treesCA=Cluster Analysis