用叉子送快递:人工智能从何而来?

Q2 Social Sciences
Izzy Thornton
{"title":"用叉子送快递:人工智能从何而来?","authors":"Izzy Thornton","doi":"10.1002/ev.20560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in evaluation and its relevance to the evolution of the field. I begin with a background on how AI models are developed, including how machine learning makes sense of data and how the algorithms it develops go on to power AI models. I go on to explain how this foundational understanding of machine learning and natural language processing informs where AI might and might not be effectively used. A critical concern is that AI models are only as strong as the data on which they are trained, and evaluators should consider important limitations when using AI, including its relevance to structural inequality. In considering the relationship between AI and evaluation, evaluators must consider both AI's use as an evaluative tool and its role as a new subject of evaluation. As AI becomes more and more relevant to a wider array of fields and disciplines, evaluators will need to develop strategies for how good the AI is (or is not), and what good the AI might (or might not) do.","PeriodicalId":35250,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Evaluation","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A special delivery by a fork: Where does artificial intelligence come from?\",\"authors\":\"Izzy Thornton\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ev.20560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, I discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in evaluation and its relevance to the evolution of the field. I begin with a background on how AI models are developed, including how machine learning makes sense of data and how the algorithms it develops go on to power AI models. I go on to explain how this foundational understanding of machine learning and natural language processing informs where AI might and might not be effectively used. A critical concern is that AI models are only as strong as the data on which they are trained, and evaluators should consider important limitations when using AI, including its relevance to structural inequality. In considering the relationship between AI and evaluation, evaluators must consider both AI's use as an evaluative tool and its role as a new subject of evaluation. As AI becomes more and more relevant to a wider array of fields and disciplines, evaluators will need to develop strategies for how good the AI is (or is not), and what good the AI might (or might not) do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Directions for Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Directions for Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我讨论了人工智能(AI)在评估中的应用及其与该领域发展的相关性。我首先介绍了人工智能模型的开发背景,包括机器学习如何理解数据,以及它开发的算法如何继续为人工智能模型提供动力。我将继续解释这种对机器学习和自然语言处理的基本理解如何影响AI在哪些领域可能有效使用,哪些领域可能无效。一个关键的问题是,人工智能模型的强度取决于它们所训练的数据,评估者在使用人工智能时应该考虑到重要的局限性,包括它与结构不平等的相关性。在考虑人工智能与评估之间的关系时,评估者必须考虑人工智能作为评估工具的使用及其作为评估新主体的作用。随着人工智能与更广泛的领域和学科越来越相关,评估人员将需要制定策略,以确定人工智能有多好(或不好),以及人工智能可能(或不可能)做什么好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A special delivery by a fork: Where does artificial intelligence come from?
Abstract In this article, I discuss the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in evaluation and its relevance to the evolution of the field. I begin with a background on how AI models are developed, including how machine learning makes sense of data and how the algorithms it develops go on to power AI models. I go on to explain how this foundational understanding of machine learning and natural language processing informs where AI might and might not be effectively used. A critical concern is that AI models are only as strong as the data on which they are trained, and evaluators should consider important limitations when using AI, including its relevance to structural inequality. In considering the relationship between AI and evaluation, evaluators must consider both AI's use as an evaluative tool and its role as a new subject of evaluation. As AI becomes more and more relevant to a wider array of fields and disciplines, evaluators will need to develop strategies for how good the AI is (or is not), and what good the AI might (or might not) do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Directions for Evaluation
New Directions for Evaluation Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信