{"title":"胸片对一种品牌留置胸膜导尿管显像的敏感性","authors":"Sophie Edgell, John Harrington, Vineeth George","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Correct placement of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) is often confirmed on chest x-ray (CXR). Recent anecdotal reports suggest a brand of IPCs (Rocket) may be difficult to visualise due to a thinner barium stripe. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of CXR for detecting these IPCs. <b>Methods:</b> Medical records of patients who underwent IPC insertion at a regional Australian tertiary centre in the 15 months to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, mention of an IPC or drain in the CXR request and/or by the radiologist in their final report. Subsequent identification on thoracic ultrasound, computed-tomography (CT) scan or uncomplicated drainage by nurses was considered evidence that the IPC was correctly sited. <b>Results:</b> 13 (Rocket) IPCs were inserted into 11 patients. 35 CXRs were performed with a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) CXRs per patient. IPCs were identified on 16/35 occasions, giving a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI 26-62%). This rose to 69% (11/16) when the IPC was mentioned in the request. On one occasion the IPC was incorrectly reported as extra-thoracic. No adverse events occurred due to the IPC not being seen on CXR. All the relevant IPCs came from specific lots which had a thinner barium stripe. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that at least a subgroup of (Rocket) IPCs are poorly seen on CXR. This may have implications for the detection of complications, compromise clinical decision making, or require additional imaging. (Rocket) has withdrawn the relevant devices from the market, but these catheters remain in-situ for many patients worldwide and radiology and pleural services should be aware of this issue.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of chest x-ray for visualisation of one brand of indwelling pleural catheter\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Edgell, John Harrington, Vineeth George\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Introduction:</b> Correct placement of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) is often confirmed on chest x-ray (CXR). Recent anecdotal reports suggest a brand of IPCs (Rocket) may be difficult to visualise due to a thinner barium stripe. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of CXR for detecting these IPCs. <b>Methods:</b> Medical records of patients who underwent IPC insertion at a regional Australian tertiary centre in the 15 months to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, mention of an IPC or drain in the CXR request and/or by the radiologist in their final report. Subsequent identification on thoracic ultrasound, computed-tomography (CT) scan or uncomplicated drainage by nurses was considered evidence that the IPC was correctly sited. <b>Results:</b> 13 (Rocket) IPCs were inserted into 11 patients. 35 CXRs were performed with a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) CXRs per patient. IPCs were identified on 16/35 occasions, giving a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI 26-62%). This rose to 69% (11/16) when the IPC was mentioned in the request. On one occasion the IPC was incorrectly reported as extra-thoracic. No adverse events occurred due to the IPC not being seen on CXR. All the relevant IPCs came from specific lots which had a thinner barium stripe. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that at least a subgroup of (Rocket) IPCs are poorly seen on CXR. This may have implications for the detection of complications, compromise clinical decision making, or require additional imaging. (Rocket) has withdrawn the relevant devices from the market, but these catheters remain in-situ for many patients worldwide and radiology and pleural services should be aware of this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:胸腔留置导尿管(IPCs)的正确放置通常在胸部x线片(CXR)上得到证实。最近的轶事报告显示,由于钡条纹较薄,IPCs品牌(Rocket)可能难以可视化。本研究旨在评价CXR检测这些IPCs的敏感性。方法:回顾性分析截至2023年1月的15个月内在澳大利亚某区域性三级中心接受IPC插入的患者病历。对患者人口统计、急诊请求和/或放射科医生在最终报告中提及的IPC或引流进行了记录审查。随后的胸部超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描或护士的简单引流被认为是IPC正确定位的证据。结果:11例患者共植入13枚(Rocket) IPCs。35例cxr,平均每例患者2例(IQR 1-4) cxr。IPCs在16/35次中被识别,灵敏度为46% (95% CI 26-62%)。当请求中提到IPC时,这一比例上升到69%(11/16)。有一次IPC被错误地报告为胸外。未发生因未在CXR上看到IPC而导致的不良事件。所有相关的ipc都来自具有较薄钡条纹的特定批次。结论:本研究表明,至少有一个亚群(Rocket) IPCs在CXR上表现不佳。这可能会影响并发症的发现,影响临床决策,或需要额外的影像学检查。(Rocket)已经从市场上撤回了相关设备,但这些导管仍然存在于世界各地的许多患者中,放射学和胸膜服务应该意识到这个问题。
Sensitivity of chest x-ray for visualisation of one brand of indwelling pleural catheter
Introduction: Correct placement of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) is often confirmed on chest x-ray (CXR). Recent anecdotal reports suggest a brand of IPCs (Rocket) may be difficult to visualise due to a thinner barium stripe. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of CXR for detecting these IPCs. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent IPC insertion at a regional Australian tertiary centre in the 15 months to January 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Records were reviewed for patient demographics, mention of an IPC or drain in the CXR request and/or by the radiologist in their final report. Subsequent identification on thoracic ultrasound, computed-tomography (CT) scan or uncomplicated drainage by nurses was considered evidence that the IPC was correctly sited. Results: 13 (Rocket) IPCs were inserted into 11 patients. 35 CXRs were performed with a median of 2 (IQR 1-4) CXRs per patient. IPCs were identified on 16/35 occasions, giving a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI 26-62%). This rose to 69% (11/16) when the IPC was mentioned in the request. On one occasion the IPC was incorrectly reported as extra-thoracic. No adverse events occurred due to the IPC not being seen on CXR. All the relevant IPCs came from specific lots which had a thinner barium stripe. Conclusions: This study suggests that at least a subgroup of (Rocket) IPCs are poorly seen on CXR. This may have implications for the detection of complications, compromise clinical decision making, or require additional imaging. (Rocket) has withdrawn the relevant devices from the market, but these catheters remain in-situ for many patients worldwide and radiology and pleural services should be aware of this issue.