法学视角下“无产权离婚”承诺的效力

{"title":"法学视角下“无产权离婚”承诺的效力","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a kind of marriage and family relationship maintenance mode, marital loyalty agreement has gradually become a new marriage and family mode, which strengthens the fulfillment of husband and wife's loyalty obligation. The promise of \"Divorce without property rights\" is the concrete manifestation of the husband and wife's loyalty obligation in the marriage law, which is similar to a kind of sworn right, but lacks the legal obligation validity guarantee. Therefore, there are differences and disputes in the identification of the effect of \"Divorce without property rights\". How to accurately position and judge the effectiveness of the promise of \"Divorce without property rights\" is the key to properly solve the problem of divorce property disputes in China. In the civil law circle, the discussion on the effect of the commitment to Divorce without property rights mainly focuses on the basic concepts of civil law, such as expression of intention, contract and contract, and the content of the discussion is mostly partial to the theory of department law. How jurisprudence is involved in the study of the effect of \"Divorce without property rights\" commitment and how to optimize the legal analysis of this legal phenomenon is another dimension to solve this problem. Jurisprudence can provide argumentation ideas for civil judgment. Jurisprudence takes the resources in the field of general jurisprudence as a reason or argument to support the views of judicial judges, which can enhance the reasoning effect of judicial judgment. Regarding the attitude towards the effectiveness of the \"Divorce without property rights\" commitment, there is not much difference between jurisprudence and civil law, and it is only effective, invalid or depending on the situation. What jurisprudence needs to do is to clarify the connotation and legal basis of the promise of \"Divorce without property rights\", optimize the legal analysis of the promise of \"Divorce without property rights\", and put forward theoretical viewpoints that are in line with the legal principle and sense, so as to provide new judgment ideas and sufficient reasoning value for the judiciary.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Validity of the Commitment of \\\"Divorce without Property Rights\\\" in the Jurisprudential Perspective\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2023.020805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a kind of marriage and family relationship maintenance mode, marital loyalty agreement has gradually become a new marriage and family mode, which strengthens the fulfillment of husband and wife's loyalty obligation. The promise of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\" is the concrete manifestation of the husband and wife's loyalty obligation in the marriage law, which is similar to a kind of sworn right, but lacks the legal obligation validity guarantee. Therefore, there are differences and disputes in the identification of the effect of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\". How to accurately position and judge the effectiveness of the promise of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\" is the key to properly solve the problem of divorce property disputes in China. In the civil law circle, the discussion on the effect of the commitment to Divorce without property rights mainly focuses on the basic concepts of civil law, such as expression of intention, contract and contract, and the content of the discussion is mostly partial to the theory of department law. How jurisprudence is involved in the study of the effect of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\" commitment and how to optimize the legal analysis of this legal phenomenon is another dimension to solve this problem. Jurisprudence can provide argumentation ideas for civil judgment. Jurisprudence takes the resources in the field of general jurisprudence as a reason or argument to support the views of judicial judges, which can enhance the reasoning effect of judicial judgment. Regarding the attitude towards the effectiveness of the \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\" commitment, there is not much difference between jurisprudence and civil law, and it is only effective, invalid or depending on the situation. What jurisprudence needs to do is to clarify the connotation and legal basis of the promise of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\", optimize the legal analysis of the promise of \\\"Divorce without property rights\\\", and put forward theoretical viewpoints that are in line with the legal principle and sense, so as to provide new judgment ideas and sufficient reasoning value for the judiciary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

婚姻忠诚协议作为一种婚姻家庭关系维护模式,逐渐成为一种新的婚姻家庭模式,强化了夫妻忠诚义务的履行。“无财产权利离婚”承诺是夫妻忠诚义务在婚姻法中的具体体现,它类似于一种宣誓权利,但缺乏法律义务效力保障。因此,对“无产权离婚”效力的认定存在分歧和争议。如何准确定位和判断“无产权离婚”承诺的效力,是妥善解决中国离婚财产纠纷问题的关键。在大陆法学界,对无产权离婚承诺效力的讨论主要集中在意思表示、合同、契约等民法基本概念上,讨论内容多偏向部门法理论。如何将法学介入到“无产权离婚”承诺的效力研究中,如何优化对这一法律现象的法律分析,是解决这一问题的另一个维度。法理学可以为民事审判提供论证思路。法理学以一般法理学领域的资源作为支持法官观点的理由或论据,可以增强司法判决的推理效果。在对“无产权离婚”承诺效力的态度上,法理学与民法并没有太大的区别,只有有效、无效或视情况而定。法理学需要做的是厘清“无产权离婚”承诺的内涵和法律依据,优化对“无产权离婚”承诺的法律分析,提出符合法理和法理的理论观点,从而为司法提供新的判断思路和充分的推理价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Validity of the Commitment of "Divorce without Property Rights" in the Jurisprudential Perspective
As a kind of marriage and family relationship maintenance mode, marital loyalty agreement has gradually become a new marriage and family mode, which strengthens the fulfillment of husband and wife's loyalty obligation. The promise of "Divorce without property rights" is the concrete manifestation of the husband and wife's loyalty obligation in the marriage law, which is similar to a kind of sworn right, but lacks the legal obligation validity guarantee. Therefore, there are differences and disputes in the identification of the effect of "Divorce without property rights". How to accurately position and judge the effectiveness of the promise of "Divorce without property rights" is the key to properly solve the problem of divorce property disputes in China. In the civil law circle, the discussion on the effect of the commitment to Divorce without property rights mainly focuses on the basic concepts of civil law, such as expression of intention, contract and contract, and the content of the discussion is mostly partial to the theory of department law. How jurisprudence is involved in the study of the effect of "Divorce without property rights" commitment and how to optimize the legal analysis of this legal phenomenon is another dimension to solve this problem. Jurisprudence can provide argumentation ideas for civil judgment. Jurisprudence takes the resources in the field of general jurisprudence as a reason or argument to support the views of judicial judges, which can enhance the reasoning effect of judicial judgment. Regarding the attitude towards the effectiveness of the "Divorce without property rights" commitment, there is not much difference between jurisprudence and civil law, and it is only effective, invalid or depending on the situation. What jurisprudence needs to do is to clarify the connotation and legal basis of the promise of "Divorce without property rights", optimize the legal analysis of the promise of "Divorce without property rights", and put forward theoretical viewpoints that are in line with the legal principle and sense, so as to provide new judgment ideas and sufficient reasoning value for the judiciary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信