案例法的作用和税收的合法性在印度的服务税的背景下

Q2 Social Sciences
J.M. Kennedy, C. Rabbiraj
{"title":"案例法的作用和税收的合法性在印度的服务税的背景下","authors":"J.M. Kennedy, C. Rabbiraj","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2023.134059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constitution is the fountainhead and basis of all laws. Article 265 of India's Constitution states, \"No tax will be levied or collected except by legislation\". The statute must use the constitution's legislative powers and be compatible with its provisions to charge and collect taxes. In India, taxing services was prohibited by the constitution. First, integrated tax is applied to the registered person's credit/debit ledger. Any residual sum goes to core tax, state tax, and union territory tax. First, increase central tax. Any remaining sum goes to state or territory tax. As the tax base grew by adding taxable services each year, the courts had to rule on their constitutionality. The authors show how the judiciary legalised the tax on services from 1994 to 2017. Using aspect theory, the courts justified the apparent overlap between taxation entries in list I - union list and list II - state list of the Constitution of India, leading to a distinct tax base for taxing services and examining aspect theory's role in generating taxable services.","PeriodicalId":38346,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of case laws and legality of taxation in the context of tax on services in India\",\"authors\":\"J.M. Kennedy, C. Rabbiraj\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijipm.2023.134059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Constitution is the fountainhead and basis of all laws. Article 265 of India's Constitution states, \\\"No tax will be levied or collected except by legislation\\\". The statute must use the constitution's legislative powers and be compatible with its provisions to charge and collect taxes. In India, taxing services was prohibited by the constitution. First, integrated tax is applied to the registered person's credit/debit ledger. Any residual sum goes to core tax, state tax, and union territory tax. First, increase central tax. Any remaining sum goes to state or territory tax. As the tax base grew by adding taxable services each year, the courts had to rule on their constitutionality. The authors show how the judiciary legalised the tax on services from 1994 to 2017. Using aspect theory, the courts justified the apparent overlap between taxation entries in list I - union list and list II - state list of the Constitution of India, leading to a distinct tax base for taxing services and examining aspect theory's role in generating taxable services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2023.134059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijipm.2023.134059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宪法是一切法律的源泉和基础。印度宪法第265条规定:“除非通过立法,否则不得征收任何税款。”法规必须使用宪法的立法权,并与宪法的规定相一致,以收取和征收税款。在印度,税收服务是被宪法禁止的。首先,将综合税应用于注册人的贷方/借方分类帐。任何剩余金额都将用于核心税、邦税和联邦领土税。第一,增加中央税收。任何剩余的金额都要交州或地区税。由于税基每年都在增加应税服务,法院不得不裁决它们是否符合宪法。作者展示了1994年至2017年司法部门是如何将服务税合法化的。利用方面理论,法院证明了印度宪法中清单1(联盟清单)和清单2(邦清单)中税收条目之间的明显重叠,从而导致了对服务征税的不同税基,并检查了方面理论在产生应税服务方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of case laws and legality of taxation in the context of tax on services in India
Constitution is the fountainhead and basis of all laws. Article 265 of India's Constitution states, "No tax will be levied or collected except by legislation". The statute must use the constitution's legislative powers and be compatible with its provisions to charge and collect taxes. In India, taxing services was prohibited by the constitution. First, integrated tax is applied to the registered person's credit/debit ledger. Any residual sum goes to core tax, state tax, and union territory tax. First, increase central tax. Any remaining sum goes to state or territory tax. As the tax base grew by adding taxable services each year, the courts had to rule on their constitutionality. The authors show how the judiciary legalised the tax on services from 1994 to 2017. Using aspect theory, the courts justified the apparent overlap between taxation entries in list I - union list and list II - state list of the Constitution of India, leading to a distinct tax base for taxing services and examining aspect theory's role in generating taxable services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信