摩西作为教皇的形象

IF 0.2 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
De Medio Aevo Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.5209/dmae.91050
Gaetano Lettieri
{"title":"摩西作为教皇的形象","authors":"Gaetano Lettieri","doi":"10.5209/dmae.91050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between the 15th and the 16th century, the Popes who emerged from the Western Schism and went through the conciliarist conflicts promoted their symbolic identification with Moses, a spiritual and temporal monarch, endowed with prophetic and imperial/legislative authority. Thus, Moses was not a generic symbol of the \"Renaissance man\" leaning towards divinization, but rather a specific and traditional figure of the Pope, the sole holder of full divinely founded sovereignty, the absolute sacred head and supreme earthly princeps, whose imperatoria maiestas encompasses supreme theological iustitia, the foundation and source of the leges, and the sacred possession of arma, the instrument of protection and glorification of the civitas Dei on earth. Here I will schematically give some examples of the most eloquent and significant points of this trajectory, bringing into focus the relevance and pervasiveness of humanistic-Renaissance Papal ideology.
 
","PeriodicalId":40181,"journal":{"name":"De Medio Aevo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moses As Figure of the Pope\",\"authors\":\"Gaetano Lettieri\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/dmae.91050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between the 15th and the 16th century, the Popes who emerged from the Western Schism and went through the conciliarist conflicts promoted their symbolic identification with Moses, a spiritual and temporal monarch, endowed with prophetic and imperial/legislative authority. Thus, Moses was not a generic symbol of the \\\"Renaissance man\\\" leaning towards divinization, but rather a specific and traditional figure of the Pope, the sole holder of full divinely founded sovereignty, the absolute sacred head and supreme earthly princeps, whose imperatoria maiestas encompasses supreme theological iustitia, the foundation and source of the leges, and the sacred possession of arma, the instrument of protection and glorification of the civitas Dei on earth. Here I will schematically give some examples of the most eloquent and significant points of this trajectory, bringing into focus the relevance and pervasiveness of humanistic-Renaissance Papal ideology.
 
\",\"PeriodicalId\":40181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Medio Aevo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Medio Aevo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/dmae.91050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Medio Aevo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/dmae.91050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在15至16世纪之间,从西方分裂中崛起并经历了调和主义冲突的教皇们,促进了他们对摩西的象征性认同,摩西是一位精神和世俗的君主,被赋予了先知和帝国/立法权威。因此,摩西并不是倾向于神化的“文艺复兴时期的人”的一般象征,而是教皇的一个特定的、传统的人物,他是完全由神建立的主权的唯一持有者,是绝对神圣的元首和至高无上的尘世元首,他的imperioria maiestas包括最高的神学iustitia,是法律的基础和来源,以及神圣的arma,是保护和美化地球上的公民的工具。在这里,我将概要地给出这一轨迹中最有说服力和最重要的一些例子,使人们关注人文主义-文艺复兴时期教皇意识形态的相关性和普遍性。& # x0D;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moses As Figure of the Pope
Between the 15th and the 16th century, the Popes who emerged from the Western Schism and went through the conciliarist conflicts promoted their symbolic identification with Moses, a spiritual and temporal monarch, endowed with prophetic and imperial/legislative authority. Thus, Moses was not a generic symbol of the "Renaissance man" leaning towards divinization, but rather a specific and traditional figure of the Pope, the sole holder of full divinely founded sovereignty, the absolute sacred head and supreme earthly princeps, whose imperatoria maiestas encompasses supreme theological iustitia, the foundation and source of the leges, and the sacred possession of arma, the instrument of protection and glorification of the civitas Dei on earth. Here I will schematically give some examples of the most eloquent and significant points of this trajectory, bringing into focus the relevance and pervasiveness of humanistic-Renaissance Papal ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
De Medio Aevo
De Medio Aevo MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信