COVID-19相关毛霉病:基于Scopus的印度研究文献计量学分析

Devi Dayal, Brij Mohan Gupta, Jivesh Bansal, Yogendra Singh
{"title":"COVID-19相关毛霉病:基于Scopus的印度研究文献计量学分析","authors":"Devi Dayal, Brij Mohan Gupta, Jivesh Bansal, Yogendra Singh","doi":"10.47909/ijsmc.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. Invasive fungal infections, specifically mucormycosis, showed a massive surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the global medical fraternity to research this highly fatal co-infection. India has contributed significantly to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) research, but a bibliometric analysis of this research topic is scarce. Using established bibliometric methods, we aimed to provide the yield and impact of CAM research in India. Design/Methodology/Approach. The publication data on CAM was extracted from Scopus. Data was analyzed using quality indices such as citations per paper (CPP), relative citation index (RCI), and total linkage strength (TLS). Results/Discussion. India contributed 640 (61.2%) to 1045 global publications on CAM research involving 548 authors from 247 organizations. Only 62 (9.8%) and 96 (15.0%) publications were funded and collaborative. The CAM research was focused on clinical features (36.5%), complications (21.7%), risk factors (19.2%), epidemiology (12.3%), diagnostics & imaging (6.8%), treatment outcomes (4.5%), prognosis (3.4%) and pathophysiology (3.1%). The average CPP of Indian publications was 7.8 compared to 28.2 CPP in France, 17.8 CPP in the USA, 8.7 CPP in Saudi Arabia, 8.3 CPP in Bangladesh, and 8.1 CPP in Iran. The major collaborations were with the USA, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Pakistan, Malaysia, and UAE. The most productive organizations were PGIMER-Chandigarh (n=47), AIIMS-New Delhi (n=44), and AIIIMS-Jodhpur (n=17), whereas the most impactful organizations were SMS Medical College, Jaipur, SGPGIMS, Lucknow and BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad. The most productive authors were A. Chakrabarti, V. Muthu, and R. Agarwal, and the most impactful were I.S. Sehgal, R. Agarwal, and V. Muthu. The most preferred journals were the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, the Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, and BMJ Case Reports. Conclusions. Even though India is the topmost contributor to global CAM research, the quality of its publications is lower than those from France and the USA. The CAM research is largely non-funded. There is a need to improve international collaboration and increase focus on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and pediatric aspects. This may lead to an improved understanding of CAM and increase survival in affected patients.","PeriodicalId":479669,"journal":{"name":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: A bibliometric analysis of Indian research based on Scopus\",\"authors\":\"Devi Dayal, Brij Mohan Gupta, Jivesh Bansal, Yogendra Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.47909/ijsmc.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. Invasive fungal infections, specifically mucormycosis, showed a massive surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the global medical fraternity to research this highly fatal co-infection. India has contributed significantly to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) research, but a bibliometric analysis of this research topic is scarce. Using established bibliometric methods, we aimed to provide the yield and impact of CAM research in India. Design/Methodology/Approach. The publication data on CAM was extracted from Scopus. Data was analyzed using quality indices such as citations per paper (CPP), relative citation index (RCI), and total linkage strength (TLS). Results/Discussion. India contributed 640 (61.2%) to 1045 global publications on CAM research involving 548 authors from 247 organizations. Only 62 (9.8%) and 96 (15.0%) publications were funded and collaborative. The CAM research was focused on clinical features (36.5%), complications (21.7%), risk factors (19.2%), epidemiology (12.3%), diagnostics & imaging (6.8%), treatment outcomes (4.5%), prognosis (3.4%) and pathophysiology (3.1%). The average CPP of Indian publications was 7.8 compared to 28.2 CPP in France, 17.8 CPP in the USA, 8.7 CPP in Saudi Arabia, 8.3 CPP in Bangladesh, and 8.1 CPP in Iran. The major collaborations were with the USA, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Pakistan, Malaysia, and UAE. The most productive organizations were PGIMER-Chandigarh (n=47), AIIMS-New Delhi (n=44), and AIIIMS-Jodhpur (n=17), whereas the most impactful organizations were SMS Medical College, Jaipur, SGPGIMS, Lucknow and BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad. The most productive authors were A. Chakrabarti, V. Muthu, and R. Agarwal, and the most impactful were I.S. Sehgal, R. Agarwal, and V. Muthu. The most preferred journals were the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, the Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, and BMJ Case Reports. Conclusions. Even though India is the topmost contributor to global CAM research, the quality of its publications is lower than those from France and the USA. The CAM research is largely non-funded. There is a need to improve international collaboration and increase focus on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and pediatric aspects. This may lead to an improved understanding of CAM and increase survival in affected patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":479669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iberoamerican journal of science measurement and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目标。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,侵袭性真菌感染,特别是毛霉菌病,出现了大规模激增,迫使全球医学界研究这种高度致命的合并感染。印度在与covid -19相关的毛霉病(CAM)研究方面做出了重大贡献,但对这一研究主题的文献计量学分析很少。利用已建立的文献计量学方法,我们旨在提供印度CAM研究的产量和影响。设计/方法/方法。CAM上的发表数据摘自Scopus。采用论文引用数(CPP)、相对引用指数(RCI)和总链接强度(TLS)等质量指标对数据进行分析。结果/讨论。印度在全球1045份CAM研究出版物中贡献了640份(61.2%),涉及来自247个组织的548位作者。只有62篇(9.8%)和96篇(15.0%)的出版物是资助和合作的。CAM的研究主要集中在临床特征(36.5%)、并发症(21.7%)、危险因素(19.2%)、流行病学(12.3%)、诊断和amp;影像学(6.8%)、治疗结果(4.5%)、预后(3.4%)和病理生理学(3.1%)。印度出版物的平均CPP为7.8,而法国为28.2 CPP,美国为17.8 CPP,沙特阿拉伯为8.7 CPP,孟加拉国为8.3 CPP,伊朗为8.1 CPP。主要合作伙伴包括美国、孟加拉国、沙特阿拉伯、英国、巴基斯坦、马来西亚和阿联酋。最具生产力的组织是pgimer -昌迪加尔(n=47)、aiims -新德里(n=44)和aiims -杰尔特布尔(n=17),而最具影响力的组织是斋浦尔的SMS医学院、SGPGIMS、勒克瑙和艾哈迈达巴德的BJ医学院。最有成效的作者是查克拉巴蒂、穆图和阿加瓦尔,最有影响力的是塞加尔、阿加瓦尔和穆图。最受欢迎的期刊是《印度眼科杂志》、《印度耳鼻喉科学杂志》和《Head &颈外科和英国医学杂志病例报告。结论。尽管印度是全球CAM研究的最大贡献者,但其出版物的质量低于法国和美国。CAM的研究大部分是没有资金支持的。有必要加强国际合作,增加对病理生理学、流行病学和儿科方面的关注。这可能会提高对CAM的理解,并增加受影响患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: A bibliometric analysis of Indian research based on Scopus
Objective. Invasive fungal infections, specifically mucormycosis, showed a massive surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing the global medical fraternity to research this highly fatal co-infection. India has contributed significantly to COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) research, but a bibliometric analysis of this research topic is scarce. Using established bibliometric methods, we aimed to provide the yield and impact of CAM research in India. Design/Methodology/Approach. The publication data on CAM was extracted from Scopus. Data was analyzed using quality indices such as citations per paper (CPP), relative citation index (RCI), and total linkage strength (TLS). Results/Discussion. India contributed 640 (61.2%) to 1045 global publications on CAM research involving 548 authors from 247 organizations. Only 62 (9.8%) and 96 (15.0%) publications were funded and collaborative. The CAM research was focused on clinical features (36.5%), complications (21.7%), risk factors (19.2%), epidemiology (12.3%), diagnostics & imaging (6.8%), treatment outcomes (4.5%), prognosis (3.4%) and pathophysiology (3.1%). The average CPP of Indian publications was 7.8 compared to 28.2 CPP in France, 17.8 CPP in the USA, 8.7 CPP in Saudi Arabia, 8.3 CPP in Bangladesh, and 8.1 CPP in Iran. The major collaborations were with the USA, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Pakistan, Malaysia, and UAE. The most productive organizations were PGIMER-Chandigarh (n=47), AIIMS-New Delhi (n=44), and AIIIMS-Jodhpur (n=17), whereas the most impactful organizations were SMS Medical College, Jaipur, SGPGIMS, Lucknow and BJ Medical College, Ahmedabad. The most productive authors were A. Chakrabarti, V. Muthu, and R. Agarwal, and the most impactful were I.S. Sehgal, R. Agarwal, and V. Muthu. The most preferred journals were the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, the Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, and BMJ Case Reports. Conclusions. Even though India is the topmost contributor to global CAM research, the quality of its publications is lower than those from France and the USA. The CAM research is largely non-funded. There is a need to improve international collaboration and increase focus on pathophysiology, epidemiology, and pediatric aspects. This may lead to an improved understanding of CAM and increase survival in affected patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信