Aleksandras Krylovas, Juozas Raulynaitis, Olga Subač
{"title":"讲师对学生错误的看法","authors":"Aleksandras Krylovas, Juozas Raulynaitis, Olga Subač","doi":"10.15388/lmr.2006.30605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of students’ works where they present not only answer but solution also, can be subjective. In this article we present some exam tasks with non-correct solutions and statistics, that show wide evaluation scale dependingly on revising teacher.","PeriodicalId":33611,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dėstytojų nuomonės apie studentų klaidas\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandras Krylovas, Juozas Raulynaitis, Olga Subač\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/lmr.2006.30605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluation of students’ works where they present not only answer but solution also, can be subjective. In this article we present some exam tasks with non-correct solutions and statistics, that show wide evaluation scale dependingly on revising teacher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/lmr.2006.30605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lmr.2006.30605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of students’ works where they present not only answer but solution also, can be subjective. In this article we present some exam tasks with non-correct solutions and statistics, that show wide evaluation scale dependingly on revising teacher.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
