我们在办公室应该测量多少血压?

Gulsum Ozkan, Sukru Ulusoy, Rahmi Yılmaz, Müge Değer, Ülver Derici, Turgay Arınsoy, Yunus Erdem
{"title":"我们在办公室应该测量多少血压?","authors":"Gulsum Ozkan, Sukru Ulusoy, Rahmi Yılmaz, Müge Değer, Ülver Derici, Turgay Arınsoy, Yunus Erdem","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3502730/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension (HT). The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients follow-up in the Cappadocia HT cohort. Methods: 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. Five BP measurements were taken at each office visit. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1 st and 2 nd BP measurements), G2 (average of the 2 nd and 3 rd ), G3 (average of the 2 nd , 3 rd , and 4 th ), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4 th , and 5 th ), and G5 (average of five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. Results: While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (p=0.002), no difference was found the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (p 0.000 for all). Conclusion: In the light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2 nd and 3 rd measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1 st value being included in the average.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?\",\"authors\":\"Gulsum Ozkan, Sukru Ulusoy, Rahmi Yılmaz, Müge Değer, Ülver Derici, Turgay Arınsoy, Yunus Erdem\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3502730/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension (HT). The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients follow-up in the Cappadocia HT cohort. Methods: 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. Five BP measurements were taken at each office visit. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1 st and 2 nd BP measurements), G2 (average of the 2 nd and 3 rd ), G3 (average of the 2 nd , 3 rd , and 4 th ), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4 th , and 5 th ), and G5 (average of five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. Results: While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (p=0.002), no difference was found the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (p 0.000 for all). Conclusion: In the light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2 nd and 3 rd measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1 st value being included in the average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3502730/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3502730/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于高血压(HT)就诊时应进行多少次血压(BP)测量,不同的指南尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是检查各种平均办公室血压测量和24小时血压监测(ABPM)在卡帕多西亚HT队列患者随访中的兼容性。方法:对207例患者的1158例办公室血压测量结果进行检查。每次就诊时进行5次血压测量。然后将结果分为G1(第1次和第2次测量的平均值)、G2(第2次和第3次测量的平均值)、G3(第2次、第3次和第4次测量的平均值)、G4(第2次、第3次、第4次和第5次测量的平均值)和G5(5次测量的平均值)。检查各组平均值与随附的24小时ABPM数据之间的相容性。结果:白天24h ABPM与G1组有显著性差异(p=0.002),其他组无显著性差异。随着五组测量次数的增加,办公室DBP接近白天24小时ABPM值,尽管所有组的平均办公室DBP数据都高于白天24小时ABPM DBP(所有组的p为0.000)。结论:根据我们的研究结果,我们建议进行3次办公室血压测量,并将第2次和第3次测量的平均值用于收缩压,而在舒张压方面,我们建议尽可能多地进行测量,而不将第1次测量的值包括在平均值中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?
Abstract Background: No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension (HT). The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients follow-up in the Cappadocia HT cohort. Methods: 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. Five BP measurements were taken at each office visit. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1 st and 2 nd BP measurements), G2 (average of the 2 nd and 3 rd ), G3 (average of the 2 nd , 3 rd , and 4 th ), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4 th , and 5 th ), and G5 (average of five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. Results: While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (p=0.002), no difference was found the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (p 0.000 for all). Conclusion: In the light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2 nd and 3 rd measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1 st value being included in the average.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信