MEAF和pMELD两种模型作为儿童肝移植术后早期致死结局指标的疗效观察

Q4 Medicine
Andrey Goncharov, Yordanka Uzunova
{"title":"MEAF和pMELD两种模型作为儿童肝移植术后早期致死结局指标的疗效观察","authors":"Andrey Goncharov, Yordanka Uzunova","doi":"10.22494/cot.v11i2.153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study is aiming to prove the effectiveness and compare “Model for Early Allograft Function” (MEAF) and “postoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease” (pMELD) in the early posttransplant setting in children. Methods. We did a retrospective study on 43 liver transplant patients for a 17-year period between the ages 0 – 18 years. MEAF and pMELD were calculated on the third and fifth postoperative day, respectively, and a Cox regression analysis was performed to find the correlation between them and mortality in the early postoperative period (EPOP). Results. Both scores proved to be statistically significant and applicable in EPOP. MEAF had P value of 0.0003 and a hazard ratio of 10.99, while pMELD demonstrated P value of 0.003 and a hazard ratio of 1.24. Conclusions. Both MEAF and pMELD can be used for the diagnostics of early allograft dysfunction and predicting the outcome of the transplantation, with MEAF having the upper hand.","PeriodicalId":36461,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Organ Transplantology","volume":"49 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of two models – MEAF and pMELD, as indicators of lethal outcome in early postoperative period after liver transplantation in children\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Goncharov, Yordanka Uzunova\",\"doi\":\"10.22494/cot.v11i2.153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study is aiming to prove the effectiveness and compare “Model for Early Allograft Function” (MEAF) and “postoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease” (pMELD) in the early posttransplant setting in children. Methods. We did a retrospective study on 43 liver transplant patients for a 17-year period between the ages 0 – 18 years. MEAF and pMELD were calculated on the third and fifth postoperative day, respectively, and a Cox regression analysis was performed to find the correlation between them and mortality in the early postoperative period (EPOP). Results. Both scores proved to be statistically significant and applicable in EPOP. MEAF had P value of 0.0003 and a hazard ratio of 10.99, while pMELD demonstrated P value of 0.003 and a hazard ratio of 1.24. Conclusions. Both MEAF and pMELD can be used for the diagnostics of early allograft dysfunction and predicting the outcome of the transplantation, with MEAF having the upper hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell and Organ Transplantology\",\"volume\":\"49 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell and Organ Transplantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Organ Transplantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22494/cot.v11i2.153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在证明“早期同种异体移植功能模型”(MEAF)和“终末期肝病术后模型”(pMELD)在儿童移植后早期环境中的有效性并进行比较。方法。我们对43例肝移植患者进行了回顾性研究,时间跨度为17年,年龄在0 - 18岁之间。分别于术后第3天和第5天计算MEAF和pMELD,并进行Cox回归分析,寻找其与术后早期死亡率(EPOP)的相关性。结果。两项评分均具有统计学意义,适用于EPOP。MEAF的P值为0.0003,风险比为10.99,pMELD的P值为0.003,风险比为1.24。结论。MEAF和pMELD均可用于异体移植早期功能障碍的诊断和移植预后的预测,其中MEAF具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of two models – MEAF and pMELD, as indicators of lethal outcome in early postoperative period after liver transplantation in children
The current study is aiming to prove the effectiveness and compare “Model for Early Allograft Function” (MEAF) and “postoperative Model for End-stage Liver Disease” (pMELD) in the early posttransplant setting in children. Methods. We did a retrospective study on 43 liver transplant patients for a 17-year period between the ages 0 – 18 years. MEAF and pMELD were calculated on the third and fifth postoperative day, respectively, and a Cox regression analysis was performed to find the correlation between them and mortality in the early postoperative period (EPOP). Results. Both scores proved to be statistically significant and applicable in EPOP. MEAF had P value of 0.0003 and a hazard ratio of 10.99, while pMELD demonstrated P value of 0.003 and a hazard ratio of 1.24. Conclusions. Both MEAF and pMELD can be used for the diagnostics of early allograft dysfunction and predicting the outcome of the transplantation, with MEAF having the upper hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell and Organ Transplantology
Cell and Organ Transplantology Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信