Goldmann压扁眼压计与Huvitz非接触式眼压计之比较

Kanav Gupta, None Kritika, BK Gupta, Soni Tarun
{"title":"Goldmann压扁眼压计与Huvitz非接触式眼压计之比较","authors":"Kanav Gupta, None Kritika, BK Gupta, Soni Tarun","doi":"10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Glaucoma has been established as the second leading cause of blindness as blindness due to glaucoma is untreatable. Glaucoma screening is very important step to prevent visual loss and for screening intraocular pressure measurement plays an important role. : The study aims to compare the Goldmann applanation tonometer with Huvitz non-contact tonometer. : This was a cross-sectional study conducted for a period of 3 months March 2023 to May 2023. 200 patients were included in the study taking care of exclusion criteria. The study was started after getting permission from the institutional ethics committee. Patients were randomly taken and they underwent NCT and GAT. The values of both were compared and analysis was done using STATA and SPSS software. : The study includes 200 patients who underwent GAT and NCT. The age group ranges from 21-45 years. The IOP values showed that the mean value in the GAT group was 15.54 mmHg and that in the NCT group was 17.255 mmHg. So, the mean value shows that the values obtained from NCT are higher than those obtained from GAT. The mean IOP in the NCT group is 1.715 mmHg higher than that in the GAT group. The study has a p-value of 0.001. : Both the above methods are frequently used for the measurement of IOP. NCT is an easy and less time-consuming method that is used more frequently. But the study concludes that the results of NCT are not as accurate and should be rechecked with those of GAT in cases with borderline values before starting workup of glaucoma.","PeriodicalId":14485,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","volume":"19 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with Huvitz non-contact tonometer\",\"authors\":\"Kanav Gupta, None Kritika, BK Gupta, Soni Tarun\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Glaucoma has been established as the second leading cause of blindness as blindness due to glaucoma is untreatable. Glaucoma screening is very important step to prevent visual loss and for screening intraocular pressure measurement plays an important role. : The study aims to compare the Goldmann applanation tonometer with Huvitz non-contact tonometer. : This was a cross-sectional study conducted for a period of 3 months March 2023 to May 2023. 200 patients were included in the study taking care of exclusion criteria. The study was started after getting permission from the institutional ethics committee. Patients were randomly taken and they underwent NCT and GAT. The values of both were compared and analysis was done using STATA and SPSS software. : The study includes 200 patients who underwent GAT and NCT. The age group ranges from 21-45 years. The IOP values showed that the mean value in the GAT group was 15.54 mmHg and that in the NCT group was 17.255 mmHg. So, the mean value shows that the values obtained from NCT are higher than those obtained from GAT. The mean IOP in the NCT group is 1.715 mmHg higher than that in the GAT group. The study has a p-value of 0.001. : Both the above methods are frequently used for the measurement of IOP. NCT is an easy and less time-consuming method that is used more frequently. But the study concludes that the results of NCT are not as accurate and should be rechecked with those of GAT in cases with borderline values before starting workup of glaucoma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于青光眼导致的失明是无法治愈的,因此青光眼已被确定为致盲的第二大原因。青光眼筛查是预防视力丧失的重要步骤,眼压测量在筛查中起着重要作用。本研究旨在比较Goldmann眼压计与Huvitz非接触式眼压计。这是一项横断面研究,为期3个月,2023年3月至2023年5月。200例患者被纳入研究,符合排除标准。该研究是在获得机构伦理委员会的许可后开始的。随机选取患者进行NCT和GAT检查。采用STATA和SPSS软件对两者数值进行比较和分析。本研究包括200例接受GAT和NCT治疗的患者。年龄从21岁到45岁不等。IOP值显示,GAT组平均为15.54 mmHg, NCT组平均为17.255 mmHg。因此,平均值表明NCT得到的值高于GAT得到的值。NCT组平均眼压比GAT组高1.715 mmHg。该研究的p值为0.001。:以上两种方法是测量眼压的常用方法。NCT是一种使用更频繁的简单、省时的方法。但该研究得出结论,NCT的结果不那么准确,在开始青光眼检查之前,对于有边缘性值的病例,应与GAT的结果重新检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with Huvitz non-contact tonometer
: Glaucoma has been established as the second leading cause of blindness as blindness due to glaucoma is untreatable. Glaucoma screening is very important step to prevent visual loss and for screening intraocular pressure measurement plays an important role. : The study aims to compare the Goldmann applanation tonometer with Huvitz non-contact tonometer. : This was a cross-sectional study conducted for a period of 3 months March 2023 to May 2023. 200 patients were included in the study taking care of exclusion criteria. The study was started after getting permission from the institutional ethics committee. Patients were randomly taken and they underwent NCT and GAT. The values of both were compared and analysis was done using STATA and SPSS software. : The study includes 200 patients who underwent GAT and NCT. The age group ranges from 21-45 years. The IOP values showed that the mean value in the GAT group was 15.54 mmHg and that in the NCT group was 17.255 mmHg. So, the mean value shows that the values obtained from NCT are higher than those obtained from GAT. The mean IOP in the NCT group is 1.715 mmHg higher than that in the GAT group. The study has a p-value of 0.001. : Both the above methods are frequently used for the measurement of IOP. NCT is an easy and less time-consuming method that is used more frequently. But the study concludes that the results of NCT are not as accurate and should be rechecked with those of GAT in cases with borderline values before starting workup of glaucoma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信