戏剧导演制度:概念的范围

Olexander Klekovkin
{"title":"戏剧导演制度:概念的范围","authors":"Olexander Klekovkin","doi":"10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":".In Ukrainian, the online search for “theatre directing system” provides over seventy thousand results, while the search for “theatre system” over four thousand, which is proof ofthese concepts to be quite widespread. However, comparing the content ofthe search query is disappointing, asit reveals the oversaturation of art history with various terms that serve asshallow labels: different scholars use these terms differently under different circumstances and in different periods. This can be illustrated with many examples, yet, the most elementary would be the most telling: anyone can count the number of some objects, for instance, of apples in a basket, as we know the features that distinguish an apple from a non-apple. Nevertheless, no proper theatre researcher or practitioner would dare to name the number of theatre directing systems, as the boundaries of this concept are too vague. At most, what could be listed isthe number of popular, “iconic” systems; and yet, any given number would be true and false at the same time. The same is accurate for the concept of an “artwork”: according toMarcel Duchamp, itis enough only to label any object as art and place itin the “art space.” This paper addresses a “(theatre) directing system”: the history ofthe concept, its essence, and its features that define the scope of its use.","PeriodicalId":499711,"journal":{"name":"Hudožnâ kulʹtura","volume":"33 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theatre Directing System: The Scope of the Concept\",\"authors\":\"Olexander Klekovkin\",\"doi\":\"10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\".In Ukrainian, the online search for “theatre directing system” provides over seventy thousand results, while the search for “theatre system” over four thousand, which is proof ofthese concepts to be quite widespread. However, comparing the content ofthe search query is disappointing, asit reveals the oversaturation of art history with various terms that serve asshallow labels: different scholars use these terms differently under different circumstances and in different periods. This can be illustrated with many examples, yet, the most elementary would be the most telling: anyone can count the number of some objects, for instance, of apples in a basket, as we know the features that distinguish an apple from a non-apple. Nevertheless, no proper theatre researcher or practitioner would dare to name the number of theatre directing systems, as the boundaries of this concept are too vague. At most, what could be listed isthe number of popular, “iconic” systems; and yet, any given number would be true and false at the same time. The same is accurate for the concept of an “artwork”: according toMarcel Duchamp, itis enough only to label any object as art and place itin the “art space.” This paper addresses a “(theatre) directing system”: the history ofthe concept, its essence, and its features that define the scope of its use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hudožnâ kulʹtura\",\"volume\":\"33 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hudožnâ kulʹtura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hudožnâ kulʹtura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.19(1).2023.283112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在乌克兰语中,在线搜索“戏剧导演系统”提供了超过7万个结果,而搜索“剧院系统”则有超过4000个结果,这证明了这些概念是相当广泛的。然而,比较搜索查询的内容是令人失望的,因为它揭示了艺术史上各种术语的过度饱和,这些术语作为肤浅的标签:不同的学者在不同的情况下和不同的时期使用这些术语是不同的。这可以用许多例子来说明,然而,最基本的例子将是最有说服力的:任何人都可以数出一些物体的数量,例如,篮子里有几个苹果,因为我们知道区分苹果和非苹果的特征。然而,没有一个真正的戏剧研究者或从业者敢说出戏剧导演系统的数量,因为这个概念的界限太模糊了。最多只能列出流行的“标志性”系统的数量;然而,任何给定的数字同时都是真和假。“艺术品”的概念也是如此:根据马塞尔·杜尚(marcel Duchamp)的说法,只要给任何物体贴上艺术的标签,并将其置于“艺术空间”中就足够了。本文讨论了“(戏剧)导演系统”的概念历史、本质以及定义其使用范围的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theatre Directing System: The Scope of the Concept
.In Ukrainian, the online search for “theatre directing system” provides over seventy thousand results, while the search for “theatre system” over four thousand, which is proof ofthese concepts to be quite widespread. However, comparing the content ofthe search query is disappointing, asit reveals the oversaturation of art history with various terms that serve asshallow labels: different scholars use these terms differently under different circumstances and in different periods. This can be illustrated with many examples, yet, the most elementary would be the most telling: anyone can count the number of some objects, for instance, of apples in a basket, as we know the features that distinguish an apple from a non-apple. Nevertheless, no proper theatre researcher or practitioner would dare to name the number of theatre directing systems, as the boundaries of this concept are too vague. At most, what could be listed isthe number of popular, “iconic” systems; and yet, any given number would be true and false at the same time. The same is accurate for the concept of an “artwork”: according toMarcel Duchamp, itis enough only to label any object as art and place itin the “art space.” This paper addresses a “(theatre) directing system”: the history ofthe concept, its essence, and its features that define the scope of its use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信