{"title":"是什么让警察抗拒研究和循证警务?检查组织和环境因素的作用","authors":"Kiseong Kuen, Cynthia Lum, Seung Hyun Kim","doi":"10.1093/police/paad051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite a growing body of research on police officers’ receptivity or resistance to evidence-based policing (EBP) and research, the mechanisms behind officers’ resistance have received limited attention. To address this gap, we investigate the impact of organizational factors (i.e. organizational justice, supervisor support, cynicism towards organizational change) and environmental factors (i.e. disrespected experience by citizens, citizen animus, crime trends) on shaping officer resistance to EBP and research using survey data from 457 front-line officers from seven police departments in Seoul, South Korea. Our findings reveal that cynicism towards organizational change significantly impacts officer resistance to EBP and research, more so than the impact of officers’ dispositional resistance to change. Furthermore, we find that organizational justice and supervisor support have significant indirect effects on officer resistance to EBP and research through cynicism towards organizational change. These results underscore the importance of improving organizational climates to reduce officer resistance to EBP and research.","PeriodicalId":47186,"journal":{"name":"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What makes police officers resist research and evidence-based policing? Examining the role of organizational and environmental factors\",\"authors\":\"Kiseong Kuen, Cynthia Lum, Seung Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/police/paad051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Despite a growing body of research on police officers’ receptivity or resistance to evidence-based policing (EBP) and research, the mechanisms behind officers’ resistance have received limited attention. To address this gap, we investigate the impact of organizational factors (i.e. organizational justice, supervisor support, cynicism towards organizational change) and environmental factors (i.e. disrespected experience by citizens, citizen animus, crime trends) on shaping officer resistance to EBP and research using survey data from 457 front-line officers from seven police departments in Seoul, South Korea. Our findings reveal that cynicism towards organizational change significantly impacts officer resistance to EBP and research, more so than the impact of officers’ dispositional resistance to change. Furthermore, we find that organizational justice and supervisor support have significant indirect effects on officer resistance to EBP and research through cynicism towards organizational change. These results underscore the importance of improving organizational climates to reduce officer resistance to EBP and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-A Journal of Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What makes police officers resist research and evidence-based policing? Examining the role of organizational and environmental factors
Abstract Despite a growing body of research on police officers’ receptivity or resistance to evidence-based policing (EBP) and research, the mechanisms behind officers’ resistance have received limited attention. To address this gap, we investigate the impact of organizational factors (i.e. organizational justice, supervisor support, cynicism towards organizational change) and environmental factors (i.e. disrespected experience by citizens, citizen animus, crime trends) on shaping officer resistance to EBP and research using survey data from 457 front-line officers from seven police departments in Seoul, South Korea. Our findings reveal that cynicism towards organizational change significantly impacts officer resistance to EBP and research, more so than the impact of officers’ dispositional resistance to change. Furthermore, we find that organizational justice and supervisor support have significant indirect effects on officer resistance to EBP and research through cynicism towards organizational change. These results underscore the importance of improving organizational climates to reduce officer resistance to EBP and research.
期刊介绍:
Policing: a Journal of Policy and Practice is a leading policy and practice publication aimed at connecting law enforcement leaders, police researchers, analysts and policy makers, this peer-reviewed journal will contain critical analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics including current law enforcement policies, police reform, political and legal developments, training and education, patrol and investigative operations, accountability, comparative police practices, and human and civil rights. The journal has an international readership and author base. It draws on examples of good practice from around the world and examines current academic research, assessing how that research can be applied both strategically and at ground level. The journal is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: Criminal Justice Abstracts, Emerging Sources Citation Index, The Standard Periodical Directory.