{"title":"齐姆巴耶娃。18世纪中期至20世纪初历史与文学中的男女:文学文本舞台背后","authors":"V. M. Essipov","doi":"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-5-182-187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"E. Tsimbaeva’s monograph analyzes the literature of the mid-18th — early 20th cc. in comparison with the realia of the everyday that were omitted from books by contemporary writers as too obvious and have become obscure and unknown to present-day readers. Notably, the book suggests that the commonly accepted rules and conventions of a period would often determine the plots of contemporary works of literature and shape the images and psychology of their characters, whereas new generations of readers may have trouble understanding their seemingly random and strange behaviour. The scholar argues that the bygone realia of the everyday and customs left behind the scenes of a literary text may not be deduced by the modern reader and therefore provide material for studies by present-day historians. Tsimbaeva’s study focuses on this missing knowledge and its cultural and literary significance.","PeriodicalId":52245,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Literatury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E. N. Tsimbaeva. Women and men in the history and literature of the mid-18th — early 20th centuries: Behind the stage of a literary text\",\"authors\":\"V. M. Essipov\",\"doi\":\"10.31425/0042-8795-2023-5-182-187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"E. Tsimbaeva’s monograph analyzes the literature of the mid-18th — early 20th cc. in comparison with the realia of the everyday that were omitted from books by contemporary writers as too obvious and have become obscure and unknown to present-day readers. Notably, the book suggests that the commonly accepted rules and conventions of a period would often determine the plots of contemporary works of literature and shape the images and psychology of their characters, whereas new generations of readers may have trouble understanding their seemingly random and strange behaviour. The scholar argues that the bygone realia of the everyday and customs left behind the scenes of a literary text may not be deduced by the modern reader and therefore provide material for studies by present-day historians. Tsimbaeva’s study focuses on this missing knowledge and its cultural and literary significance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Literatury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-5-182-187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Literatury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31425/0042-8795-2023-5-182-187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
E. Tsimbaeva的专著分析了18世纪中期至20世纪初的文学,并将其与当代作家的书中省略的日常现实进行了比较,因为这些现实太过明显,对当今的读者来说已经变得模糊和未知。值得注意的是,这本书表明,一个时期普遍接受的规则和习俗往往会决定当代文学作品的情节,塑造人物的形象和心理,而新一代的读者可能很难理解他们看似随意和奇怪的行为。这位学者认为,文学文本背后留下的过去的日常现实和习俗可能无法被现代读者推断出来,因此无法为当今历史学家的研究提供材料。齐巴耶娃的研究聚焦于这一缺失的知识及其文化和文学意义。
E. N. Tsimbaeva. Women and men in the history and literature of the mid-18th — early 20th centuries: Behind the stage of a literary text
E. Tsimbaeva’s monograph analyzes the literature of the mid-18th — early 20th cc. in comparison with the realia of the everyday that were omitted from books by contemporary writers as too obvious and have become obscure and unknown to present-day readers. Notably, the book suggests that the commonly accepted rules and conventions of a period would often determine the plots of contemporary works of literature and shape the images and psychology of their characters, whereas new generations of readers may have trouble understanding their seemingly random and strange behaviour. The scholar argues that the bygone realia of the everyday and customs left behind the scenes of a literary text may not be deduced by the modern reader and therefore provide material for studies by present-day historians. Tsimbaeva’s study focuses on this missing knowledge and its cultural and literary significance.