旋转爆轰燃烧室CFD预测出口非定常超声速-亚音速流场的验证

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Piyush Raj, Shaon Talukdar, Dalton Langner, Apurav Gupta, Joseph Meadows, Ajay Agrawal
{"title":"旋转爆轰燃烧室CFD预测出口非定常超声速-亚音速流场的验证","authors":"Piyush Raj, Shaon Talukdar, Dalton Langner, Apurav Gupta, Joseph Meadows, Ajay Agrawal","doi":"10.1115/1.4063706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rotating detonation combustors (RDC) have gained increased interest for integration with power-generating gas turbines due to the potential to increase thermal efficiency. The unsteady flow field exiting the RDC is fundamentally different compared to traditional swirl-stabilized combustors. Successful integration of RDC with gas turbines will depend on the ability to properly condition the unsteady flow to achieve performance levels comparable to swirl-stabilized combustors. RDC simulations require significant computational resources due to the small spatial and temporal time scales required to resolve the detonation phenomenon. Furthermore, traditional steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are not possible for RDC simulations. The present study develops and validates a computationally efficient approach for predicting unsteady flow fields exiting the combustor using 2D, transient reacting CFD with periodic boundary conditions in the combustor and a downstream plenum. Validation is performed by comparing the CFD results to various experimental measurements: i) wave speed obtained from high-speed ion probe and dynamic pressure data, ii) average wall static pressure measurements, and iii) time-resolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) at 100 kHz at the RDC exit. Results indicate good agreement between CFD and experiments with respect to velocity field exiting the RDC, detonation wave speed, and static pressure distribution.","PeriodicalId":15685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Rotating Detonation Combustor CFD for Predicting Unsteady Supersonic-Subsonic Flow Field At the Exit\",\"authors\":\"Piyush Raj, Shaon Talukdar, Dalton Langner, Apurav Gupta, Joseph Meadows, Ajay Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Rotating detonation combustors (RDC) have gained increased interest for integration with power-generating gas turbines due to the potential to increase thermal efficiency. The unsteady flow field exiting the RDC is fundamentally different compared to traditional swirl-stabilized combustors. Successful integration of RDC with gas turbines will depend on the ability to properly condition the unsteady flow to achieve performance levels comparable to swirl-stabilized combustors. RDC simulations require significant computational resources due to the small spatial and temporal time scales required to resolve the detonation phenomenon. Furthermore, traditional steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are not possible for RDC simulations. The present study develops and validates a computationally efficient approach for predicting unsteady flow fields exiting the combustor using 2D, transient reacting CFD with periodic boundary conditions in the combustor and a downstream plenum. Validation is performed by comparing the CFD results to various experimental measurements: i) wave speed obtained from high-speed ion probe and dynamic pressure data, ii) average wall static pressure measurements, and iii) time-resolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) at 100 kHz at the RDC exit. Results indicate good agreement between CFD and experiments with respect to velocity field exiting the RDC, detonation wave speed, and static pressure distribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063706\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要旋转爆轰燃烧室(RDC)由于具有提高热效率的潜力,在与发电燃气轮机集成方面获得了越来越多的关注。RDC出口的非定常流场与传统的旋流稳定燃烧室有本质的不同。RDC与燃气轮机的成功集成将取决于适当调节非定常流的能力,以达到与旋流稳定燃烧器相当的性能水平。由于求解爆炸现象所需的空间和时间尺度较小,RDC模拟需要大量的计算资源。此外,传统的稳态计算流体动力学(CFD)分析不可能用于RDC模拟。本研究开发并验证了一种计算效率高的方法,该方法使用燃烧室和下游静压室中具有周期性边界条件的二维瞬态反应CFD来预测出燃烧室的非定常流场。通过将CFD结果与各种实验测量结果进行比较来验证:i)高速离子探针和动压数据获得的波速,ii)平均壁面静压测量,以及iii) RDC出口100 kHz时分辨粒子图像测速(PIV)。计算结果表明,在RDC出口速度场、爆震波速度和静压分布方面,CFD与实验结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Rotating Detonation Combustor CFD for Predicting Unsteady Supersonic-Subsonic Flow Field At the Exit
Abstract Rotating detonation combustors (RDC) have gained increased interest for integration with power-generating gas turbines due to the potential to increase thermal efficiency. The unsteady flow field exiting the RDC is fundamentally different compared to traditional swirl-stabilized combustors. Successful integration of RDC with gas turbines will depend on the ability to properly condition the unsteady flow to achieve performance levels comparable to swirl-stabilized combustors. RDC simulations require significant computational resources due to the small spatial and temporal time scales required to resolve the detonation phenomenon. Furthermore, traditional steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are not possible for RDC simulations. The present study develops and validates a computationally efficient approach for predicting unsteady flow fields exiting the combustor using 2D, transient reacting CFD with periodic boundary conditions in the combustor and a downstream plenum. Validation is performed by comparing the CFD results to various experimental measurements: i) wave speed obtained from high-speed ion probe and dynamic pressure data, ii) average wall static pressure measurements, and iii) time-resolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) at 100 kHz at the RDC exit. Results indicate good agreement between CFD and experiments with respect to velocity field exiting the RDC, detonation wave speed, and static pressure distribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power publishes archival-quality papers in the areas of gas and steam turbine technology, nuclear engineering, internal combustion engines, and fossil power generation. It covers a broad spectrum of practical topics of interest to industry. Subject areas covered include: thermodynamics; fluid mechanics; heat transfer; and modeling; propulsion and power generation components and systems; combustion, fuels, and emissions; nuclear reactor systems and components; thermal hydraulics; heat exchangers; nuclear fuel technology and waste management; I. C. engines for marine, rail, and power generation; steam and hydro power generation; advanced cycles for fossil energy generation; pollution control and environmental effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信