专业取向对青少年和成人社区矫正人员监督行为的影响:一个多机构分析

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Riane M. Bolin, Brandon K. Applegate
{"title":"专业取向对青少年和成人社区矫正人员监督行为的影响:一个多机构分析","authors":"Riane M. Bolin, Brandon K. Applegate","doi":"10.1080/0735648x.2023.2269168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTEarly scholarship on community corrections officers suggested that officers’ perceptions of their professional role influences how they carry out supervision. While some research has supported this contention, the studies examining the relationship have provided minimal attention to juvenile probation and parole, rarely considered actual as well as intended supervision behaviors, and analyzed samples with limited generalizability. The present study sought to fill this gap. Data were collected through the use of an online questionnaire from a sample of juvenile and adult probation and parole officers employed in seven different agencies in five states during spring 2015. The study found client type to be a significant predictor of both officer actual and intended behaviors, with juvenile PPOs preferring more frequent surveillance techniques and less frequent rewards for probationer progress toward goals. Professional orientation was also a significant predict of both types of behavior. Implications of these findings are discussed.KEYWORDS: Juvenile justiceprobationparoleprofessional orientationprobation officer behaviorcommunity corrections Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Robustness checks of the multivariate analyses revealed substantively identical results when we removed officers who supervised both adults and juveniles from the sample, thereby comparing officers who only worked with either adults or juveniles. We elected to report the models that included all officers, drawing on full dataset.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRiane M. BolinRiane M. Bolin is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Her primary research interests include issues related to juvenile justice and corrections.Brandon K. ApplegateBrandon K. Applegate is a Professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina. His research examines punishment and rehabilitation policy, correctional treatment, juvenile justice, public views of correctional policies, jail issues, and decision-making among criminal justice professionals. Applegate previously served as President of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences and as President of the Southern Criminal Justice Association.","PeriodicalId":46770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crime & Justice","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of professional orientations on officers’ supervision behaviors in juvenile and adult community corrections: a multi-agency analysis\",\"authors\":\"Riane M. Bolin, Brandon K. Applegate\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0735648x.2023.2269168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTEarly scholarship on community corrections officers suggested that officers’ perceptions of their professional role influences how they carry out supervision. While some research has supported this contention, the studies examining the relationship have provided minimal attention to juvenile probation and parole, rarely considered actual as well as intended supervision behaviors, and analyzed samples with limited generalizability. The present study sought to fill this gap. Data were collected through the use of an online questionnaire from a sample of juvenile and adult probation and parole officers employed in seven different agencies in five states during spring 2015. The study found client type to be a significant predictor of both officer actual and intended behaviors, with juvenile PPOs preferring more frequent surveillance techniques and less frequent rewards for probationer progress toward goals. Professional orientation was also a significant predict of both types of behavior. Implications of these findings are discussed.KEYWORDS: Juvenile justiceprobationparoleprofessional orientationprobation officer behaviorcommunity corrections Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Robustness checks of the multivariate analyses revealed substantively identical results when we removed officers who supervised both adults and juveniles from the sample, thereby comparing officers who only worked with either adults or juveniles. We elected to report the models that included all officers, drawing on full dataset.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRiane M. BolinRiane M. Bolin is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Her primary research interests include issues related to juvenile justice and corrections.Brandon K. ApplegateBrandon K. Applegate is a Professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina. His research examines punishment and rehabilitation policy, correctional treatment, juvenile justice, public views of correctional policies, jail issues, and decision-making among criminal justice professionals. Applegate previously served as President of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences and as President of the Southern Criminal Justice Association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crime & Justice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crime & Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2023.2269168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crime & Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2023.2269168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要早期关于社区矫正人员的研究表明,社区矫正人员对其职业角色的认知会影响其实施监督的方式。虽然一些研究支持这一论点,但研究这种关系的研究对青少年缓刑和假释的关注很少,很少考虑实际和预期的监督行为,并且分析的样本具有有限的普遍性。本研究试图填补这一空白。2015年春季,我们通过在线问卷收集了来自五个州七个不同机构的青少年和成人缓刑和假释官的数据。研究发现,客户类型是警官实际行为和预期行为的重要预测因素,青少年警务人员更喜欢更频繁的监视技术,而对缓刑人员实现目标的奖励较少。职业取向对这两种行为都有显著的预测作用。讨论了这些发现的意义。关键词:少年司法缓刑假释职业取向缓刑官行为社区矫正披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。多变量分析的稳健性检查显示,当我们从样本中剔除监管成年人和青少年的警官时,结果基本相同,从而比较只监管成年人和青少年的警官。我们选择报告包括所有警官在内的模型,利用完整的数据集。作者简介riane M. Bolin是雷德福大学刑事司法系的副教授和系主任。她的主要研究兴趣包括与青少年司法和矫正有关的问题。Brandon K. Applegate是南卡罗来纳大学犯罪学和刑事司法系的教授。他的研究考察了惩罚和改造政策、矫正治疗、少年司法、公众对矫正政策的看法、监狱问题和刑事司法专业人员的决策。阿普尔盖特此前曾担任刑事司法科学院院长和南方刑事司法协会主席。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of professional orientations on officers’ supervision behaviors in juvenile and adult community corrections: a multi-agency analysis
ABSTRACTEarly scholarship on community corrections officers suggested that officers’ perceptions of their professional role influences how they carry out supervision. While some research has supported this contention, the studies examining the relationship have provided minimal attention to juvenile probation and parole, rarely considered actual as well as intended supervision behaviors, and analyzed samples with limited generalizability. The present study sought to fill this gap. Data were collected through the use of an online questionnaire from a sample of juvenile and adult probation and parole officers employed in seven different agencies in five states during spring 2015. The study found client type to be a significant predictor of both officer actual and intended behaviors, with juvenile PPOs preferring more frequent surveillance techniques and less frequent rewards for probationer progress toward goals. Professional orientation was also a significant predict of both types of behavior. Implications of these findings are discussed.KEYWORDS: Juvenile justiceprobationparoleprofessional orientationprobation officer behaviorcommunity corrections Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Robustness checks of the multivariate analyses revealed substantively identical results when we removed officers who supervised both adults and juveniles from the sample, thereby comparing officers who only worked with either adults or juveniles. We elected to report the models that included all officers, drawing on full dataset.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRiane M. BolinRiane M. Bolin is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice at Radford University. Her primary research interests include issues related to juvenile justice and corrections.Brandon K. ApplegateBrandon K. Applegate is a Professor in the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Carolina. His research examines punishment and rehabilitation policy, correctional treatment, juvenile justice, public views of correctional policies, jail issues, and decision-making among criminal justice professionals. Applegate previously served as President of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences and as President of the Southern Criminal Justice Association.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Crime & Justice
Journal of Crime & Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信