将海洋纳入国家系统性气候诉讼——尽职调查是一座桥梁吗?

Q3 Social Sciences
K. McKenzie
{"title":"将海洋纳入国家系统性气候诉讼——尽职调查是一座桥梁吗?","authors":"K. McKenzie","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2023/2/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we watch continuous news coverage of heat waves, wildfires, epic floods and beaches full of dead fish due to unprecedented ocean temperatures, action is being taken at the international level to clarify state obligations under the law of the sea convention as they pertain specifically to climate change. In the face of the stubborn remaining large gap between what is necessary and what is actually being done to mitigate the worst of climate change, systemic climate litigation in national courts is gaining in importance as a driver of more ambitious climate action. This paper considers the implications of a hypothetical inclusion of law of the sea due diligence arguments in national systemic climate litigation as a potential tool to require states to significantly increase their immediate- and near-term ambition to dramatically reduce GHG emissions.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing the Ocean into National Systemic Climate Litigation – Is Due Diligence a Bridge?\",\"authors\":\"K. McKenzie\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/cclr/2023/2/6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As we watch continuous news coverage of heat waves, wildfires, epic floods and beaches full of dead fish due to unprecedented ocean temperatures, action is being taken at the international level to clarify state obligations under the law of the sea convention as they pertain specifically to climate change. In the face of the stubborn remaining large gap between what is necessary and what is actually being done to mitigate the worst of climate change, systemic climate litigation in national courts is gaining in importance as a driver of more ambitious climate action. This paper considers the implications of a hypothetical inclusion of law of the sea due diligence arguments in national systemic climate litigation as a potential tool to require states to significantly increase their immediate- and near-term ambition to dramatically reduce GHG emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2023/2/6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2023/2/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们看到不断有关于热浪、野火、史诗般的洪水和由于前所未有的海洋温度而导致的海滩上满是死鱼的新闻报道时,国际层面正在采取行动,明确《海洋法公约》规定的国家义务,因为它们专门与气候变化有关。为了缓解最坏的气候变化,在必要的行动和实际的行动之间仍然存在着巨大的差距,面对这种差距,在国家法院进行的系统性气候诉讼作为推动更有雄心的气候行动的动力,正变得越来越重要。本文考虑了在国家系统性气候诉讼中假设纳入海洋法尽职调查论点的影响,作为一种潜在的工具,要求各州大幅提高其近期和近期大幅减少温室气体排放的雄心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bringing the Ocean into National Systemic Climate Litigation – Is Due Diligence a Bridge?
As we watch continuous news coverage of heat waves, wildfires, epic floods and beaches full of dead fish due to unprecedented ocean temperatures, action is being taken at the international level to clarify state obligations under the law of the sea convention as they pertain specifically to climate change. In the face of the stubborn remaining large gap between what is necessary and what is actually being done to mitigate the worst of climate change, systemic climate litigation in national courts is gaining in importance as a driver of more ambitious climate action. This paper considers the implications of a hypothetical inclusion of law of the sea due diligence arguments in national systemic climate litigation as a potential tool to require states to significantly increase their immediate- and near-term ambition to dramatically reduce GHG emissions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信