{"title":"符拉迪沃斯托克(日本海)彼得大湾沿岸软沉积物中大型底栖动物的数量及其生态状况Сommunities","authors":"A. V. Moshchenko","doi":"10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-618-638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At least 16 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas with the depth of ≥ 5 m of Peter the Great Bay at Vladivostok surveyed in 2001–2019. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Sigambra bassi; II. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; III. Philine orientalis + Macoma sp.; IV. Aphelochaeta pacifica; V. A. pacifica + Capitella capitata; VI. O. sarsii + Macoma scarlatoi; VII. O. sarsii + Scoletoma spp. + Scoloplos armiger + Ennucula tenuis; VIII. Phoronopsis harmeri; IX. Maldane sarsi; X. A. pacifica + Dipolydora cardalia; XI. Scoletoma spp.; XII. Praxillella gracilis + Pelonaia corrugata, XIII O. sarsii + Acila insignis, XIV Scoletoma spp. + O. sarsii + M. sarsi; XV. Scoletoma spp. + M. scarlatoi, and XVI. A. pacifica. Their differentiation was determined by such environmental imperatives as the level of chemical pollution, eutrophication, and impact of terrigenous water discharge. By biotic indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, TPFbio), the most damaged and environmentally disturbed communities were IV, V, and XVI inhabited the Golden Horn Bay and Diomid Inlet. The communities of the East Bosphorus Strait (III, VI) have higher ecological status that increases even more in the Amur and Ussuri Bays (communities I, II, VII, XII, XIII, XV, XIV), except of the northern tips of both bays (IX, XI) and the eastern part of the Amur Bay (VIII, X). With such bioindicative approach, ecological status of the communities is described more concisely and visually than with indices of species richness, diversity, or W-statistics.","PeriodicalId":491504,"journal":{"name":"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Сommunities of macrozoobenthos on soft sediments in the coastal areas of Peter the Great Bay near Vladivostok (Japan Sea) and their ecological status\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Moshchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-618-638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At least 16 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas with the depth of ≥ 5 m of Peter the Great Bay at Vladivostok surveyed in 2001–2019. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Sigambra bassi; II. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; III. Philine orientalis + Macoma sp.; IV. Aphelochaeta pacifica; V. A. pacifica + Capitella capitata; VI. O. sarsii + Macoma scarlatoi; VII. O. sarsii + Scoletoma spp. + Scoloplos armiger + Ennucula tenuis; VIII. Phoronopsis harmeri; IX. Maldane sarsi; X. A. pacifica + Dipolydora cardalia; XI. Scoletoma spp.; XII. Praxillella gracilis + Pelonaia corrugata, XIII O. sarsii + Acila insignis, XIV Scoletoma spp. + O. sarsii + M. sarsi; XV. Scoletoma spp. + M. scarlatoi, and XVI. A. pacifica. Their differentiation was determined by such environmental imperatives as the level of chemical pollution, eutrophication, and impact of terrigenous water discharge. By biotic indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, TPFbio), the most damaged and environmentally disturbed communities were IV, V, and XVI inhabited the Golden Horn Bay and Diomid Inlet. The communities of the East Bosphorus Strait (III, VI) have higher ecological status that increases even more in the Amur and Ussuri Bays (communities I, II, VII, XII, XIII, XV, XIV), except of the northern tips of both bays (IX, XI) and the eastern part of the Amur Bay (VIII, X). With such bioindicative approach, ecological status of the communities is described more concisely and visually than with indices of species richness, diversity, or W-statistics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":491504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-618-638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-618-638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通过现代统计方法,对 2001-2019 年调查的符拉迪沃斯托克彼得大帝湾水深≥ 5 米沿岸地区的软沉积物进行了测定,确定了至少 16 个大型底栖生物群落。它们是I. Scoletoma spp.Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; III.Philine orientalis + Macoma sp.Aphelochaeta pacifica; V. A. pacifica + Capitella capitata; VI.O. sarsii + Macoma scarlatoi; VII.O. sarsii + Scoletoma spp.Phoronopsis harmeri; IX.Maldane sarsi; X. A. pacifica + Dipolydora cardalia; XI.Scoletoma spp.; XII.Praxillella gracilis + Pelonaia corrugata, XIII O. sarsii + Acila insignis, XIV Scoletoma spp.Scoletoma spp.+M.scarlatoi,以及 XVI.A. pacifica。它们之间的差异是由化学污染程度、富营养化程度和原生水排放的影响等环境因素决定的。根据生物指数(AMBI、M-AMBI、TPFbio),栖息在金角湾和迪奥米德湾的 IV、V 和 XVI 群落受到的破坏和环境干扰最大。东博斯普鲁斯海峡的群落(III、VI)生态状况较好,阿穆尔湾和乌苏里湾的群落(I、II、VII、XII、XIII、XV、XIV)生态状况更差,但这两个湾的北端(IX、XI)和阿穆尔湾东部(VIII、X)除外。与物种丰富度、多样性或 W 统计指数相比,采用这种生物指示方法更简洁、更直观地描述了群落的生态状况。
Сommunities of macrozoobenthos on soft sediments in the coastal areas of Peter the Great Bay near Vladivostok (Japan Sea) and their ecological status
At least 16 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas with the depth of ≥ 5 m of Peter the Great Bay at Vladivostok surveyed in 2001–2019. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Sigambra bassi; II. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; III. Philine orientalis + Macoma sp.; IV. Aphelochaeta pacifica; V. A. pacifica + Capitella capitata; VI. O. sarsii + Macoma scarlatoi; VII. O. sarsii + Scoletoma spp. + Scoloplos armiger + Ennucula tenuis; VIII. Phoronopsis harmeri; IX. Maldane sarsi; X. A. pacifica + Dipolydora cardalia; XI. Scoletoma spp.; XII. Praxillella gracilis + Pelonaia corrugata, XIII O. sarsii + Acila insignis, XIV Scoletoma spp. + O. sarsii + M. sarsi; XV. Scoletoma spp. + M. scarlatoi, and XVI. A. pacifica. Their differentiation was determined by such environmental imperatives as the level of chemical pollution, eutrophication, and impact of terrigenous water discharge. By biotic indices (AMBI, M-AMBI, TPFbio), the most damaged and environmentally disturbed communities were IV, V, and XVI inhabited the Golden Horn Bay and Diomid Inlet. The communities of the East Bosphorus Strait (III, VI) have higher ecological status that increases even more in the Amur and Ussuri Bays (communities I, II, VII, XII, XIII, XV, XIV), except of the northern tips of both bays (IX, XI) and the eastern part of the Amur Bay (VIII, X). With such bioindicative approach, ecological status of the communities is described more concisely and visually than with indices of species richness, diversity, or W-statistics.