需要中的跨界对话:种族、民族还是民间团体?

IF 0.5 2区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
Juwen Zhang, Wanda G. Addison, Margaret Magat, Mark Y. Miyake, Raymond Summerville, Anthony Bak Buccitelli
{"title":"需要中的跨界对话:种族、民族还是民间团体?","authors":"Juwen Zhang, Wanda G. Addison, Margaret Magat, Mark Y. Miyake, Raymond Summerville, Anthony Bak Buccitelli","doi":"10.5406/15351882.136.542.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As we enter the twenty-first century, reflexive approaches to the history of folklore studies around the world, along with the antiracist and decolonizing efforts in academic studies in general, have led to a series of paradigmatic shifts away from the Eurocentric systems of defining genre, folk, racial group, and identity. What remains to be essential, yet to be fully subverted, is the concept and practice of “racial/ethnic groups” that is still used by folklorists in studying folklores in cultural groups. Continuously drawing the boundaries through the concept of “race” is nothing but reinforcing the existing racist system. Unless we build dialogues across the existing “racial” boundaries and seek new common terms and concepts, we are not able to make progress in understanding and accepting the nature and reality of our hybridized folklore traditions that inform the folk groups that we are in, as well as our own personal identities. It is with this premise that the authors contributing to this piece initiate this cross-boundary dialogue, expecting to inspire more people to join in.","PeriodicalId":46681,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Boundary Dialogue in Need: Racial, Ethnic, or Folk Groups?\",\"authors\":\"Juwen Zhang, Wanda G. Addison, Margaret Magat, Mark Y. Miyake, Raymond Summerville, Anthony Bak Buccitelli\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/15351882.136.542.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As we enter the twenty-first century, reflexive approaches to the history of folklore studies around the world, along with the antiracist and decolonizing efforts in academic studies in general, have led to a series of paradigmatic shifts away from the Eurocentric systems of defining genre, folk, racial group, and identity. What remains to be essential, yet to be fully subverted, is the concept and practice of “racial/ethnic groups” that is still used by folklorists in studying folklores in cultural groups. Continuously drawing the boundaries through the concept of “race” is nothing but reinforcing the existing racist system. Unless we build dialogues across the existing “racial” boundaries and seek new common terms and concepts, we are not able to make progress in understanding and accepting the nature and reality of our hybridized folklore traditions that inform the folk groups that we are in, as well as our own personal identities. It is with this premise that the authors contributing to this piece initiate this cross-boundary dialogue, expecting to inspire more people to join in.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/15351882.136.542.04\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/15351882.136.542.04","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着我们进入21世纪,世界范围内民俗学研究的反思方法,以及学术研究中的反种族主义和非殖民化努力,导致了一系列以欧洲为中心的定义流派、民间、种族群体和身份的范式转变。民俗学家在研究文化群体中的民间传说时,仍然使用“种族/民族”的概念和实践,这是必不可少的,但需要被完全颠覆的。通过“种族”的概念不断划定界限,无异于强化现有的种族主义制度。除非我们建立跨越现有“种族”界限的对话,并寻求新的共同术语和概念,否则我们无法在理解和接受我们混杂的民间传说传统的性质和现实方面取得进展,这些民间传说传统为我们所在的民间团体以及我们自己的个人身份提供了信息。正是在这样的前提下,作者们开始了这篇文章的跨界对话,希望能激励更多人加入进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cross-Boundary Dialogue in Need: Racial, Ethnic, or Folk Groups?
Abstract As we enter the twenty-first century, reflexive approaches to the history of folklore studies around the world, along with the antiracist and decolonizing efforts in academic studies in general, have led to a series of paradigmatic shifts away from the Eurocentric systems of defining genre, folk, racial group, and identity. What remains to be essential, yet to be fully subverted, is the concept and practice of “racial/ethnic groups” that is still used by folklorists in studying folklores in cultural groups. Continuously drawing the boundaries through the concept of “race” is nothing but reinforcing the existing racist system. Unless we build dialogues across the existing “racial” boundaries and seek new common terms and concepts, we are not able to make progress in understanding and accepting the nature and reality of our hybridized folklore traditions that inform the folk groups that we are in, as well as our own personal identities. It is with this premise that the authors contributing to this piece initiate this cross-boundary dialogue, expecting to inspire more people to join in.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信