优柔寡断的本质:理解印度的安全政策选择

IF 1.3
{"title":"优柔寡断的本质:理解印度的安全政策选择","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/asp.2023.a911624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Essence of Indecision:Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices Frank O'Donnell (bio) As India's decisions become more consequential to global politics, understanding the influences behind them is increasingly crucial for scholars, policy experts, and world political leaders. Rajesh Basrur's new book, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India's Foreign Policy, deftly explains the interplay of India's internal politics, external environment, and policymaker preference hierarchies to offer a persuasive theory of Indian decision-making on foreign and defense policy. Importantly, the book includes case selections that encompass security policy decisions made not only during the current government led by Narendra Modi, which began in 2014, but also during the previous several decades. As such, this book is highly recommended for both scholars and relative newcomers to the topics of South Asia studies, rising powers, and international security. As befits one of the most thoughtful scholars of India's security policies, Basrur eloquently engages with existing theoretical schools of international relations and their explanations of Indian external conduct. He develops the neoclassical realist paradigm as a theory more permissive of domestic political explanations than the external systemic focus of structural realism. The author modifies this paradigm to introduce an analytic tool of evaluating whether policymakers make the necessary decisions within their power to protect citizens. This test inherently draws upon realist thought, dating back to Kautilya and Machiavelli, that the primary—and moral—obligation of leaders is to protect their subjects. As Basrur powerfully argues, locating responsibility for state failures in this regard is crucial not just for better policymaking but for theoretical development in bridging the \"materialist/normative divide in academia,\" as \"in important respects, the moral is the empirical when accountability is neglected in making policy\" (p. xii). Democratic leaders cannot control all elements of their domestic political context and have even less influence over often fast-moving developments in regional and international politics. Reflecting this reality, [End Page 129] Basrur conceptualizes the distinct categories of involuntary and voluntary drift (pp. 9–10) to explain why \"uncertainty and indecisiveness have periodically afflicted India's foreign policy in areas of critical importance to its national security\" (pp. 1–2). Involuntary drift occurs when leaders cannot implement effective policy due to players with domestic veto power. In the two cases of involuntary drift exemplified in negotiating the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement (2005–8) and Indian policy toward the Sri Lankan civil war (1983–2009), these veto players were Indian political parties opposed to the prime minister's preferred course of action. The parliamentary fragility of coalition governments meant that these parties were able to variably block, water down, or delay the execution of policy responses. Importantly, Basrur notes that the initial preferred policies of decision-makers were \"system-driven,\" and would be recognized by structural realists as judicious initiatives to improve or stabilize India's international power position. The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal has been extensively covered in extant literature on contemporary Indian foreign policy, which has also established that the parliamentary opposition of both the opportunistic Bharatiya Janata Party and the anti-American Communist Party of India (Marxist) was the major cause of delays to India's approval of the deal. However, the Sri Lankan case study offers a rare cogent yet nuanced account of Indian policy toward each phase of the civil war, and how shifting domestic political forces in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu complicated India's response. The book demonstrates how India's hesitant and halting support for the Sri Lankan government, especially in the latter stages of the war, created room for China to fill this space and establish a strategic foothold in Colombo, which it continues to enjoy today. Ineffective Indian policies have therefore led to negative systemic consequences for New Delhi in its broader geopolitical competition with Beijing. The second part of the book examines cases of voluntary drift, where decision-makers face little or no meaningful domestic political constraints on their ability to devise and implement their preferred policies. Policy drift here occurs when leaders still \"choose options that avoid difficult and costly action, in part because the political cost of inadequate action is not severe...","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essence of Indecision: Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/asp.2023.a911624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Essence of Indecision:Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices Frank O'Donnell (bio) As India's decisions become more consequential to global politics, understanding the influences behind them is increasingly crucial for scholars, policy experts, and world political leaders. Rajesh Basrur's new book, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India's Foreign Policy, deftly explains the interplay of India's internal politics, external environment, and policymaker preference hierarchies to offer a persuasive theory of Indian decision-making on foreign and defense policy. Importantly, the book includes case selections that encompass security policy decisions made not only during the current government led by Narendra Modi, which began in 2014, but also during the previous several decades. As such, this book is highly recommended for both scholars and relative newcomers to the topics of South Asia studies, rising powers, and international security. As befits one of the most thoughtful scholars of India's security policies, Basrur eloquently engages with existing theoretical schools of international relations and their explanations of Indian external conduct. He develops the neoclassical realist paradigm as a theory more permissive of domestic political explanations than the external systemic focus of structural realism. The author modifies this paradigm to introduce an analytic tool of evaluating whether policymakers make the necessary decisions within their power to protect citizens. This test inherently draws upon realist thought, dating back to Kautilya and Machiavelli, that the primary—and moral—obligation of leaders is to protect their subjects. As Basrur powerfully argues, locating responsibility for state failures in this regard is crucial not just for better policymaking but for theoretical development in bridging the \\\"materialist/normative divide in academia,\\\" as \\\"in important respects, the moral is the empirical when accountability is neglected in making policy\\\" (p. xii). Democratic leaders cannot control all elements of their domestic political context and have even less influence over often fast-moving developments in regional and international politics. Reflecting this reality, [End Page 129] Basrur conceptualizes the distinct categories of involuntary and voluntary drift (pp. 9–10) to explain why \\\"uncertainty and indecisiveness have periodically afflicted India's foreign policy in areas of critical importance to its national security\\\" (pp. 1–2). Involuntary drift occurs when leaders cannot implement effective policy due to players with domestic veto power. In the two cases of involuntary drift exemplified in negotiating the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement (2005–8) and Indian policy toward the Sri Lankan civil war (1983–2009), these veto players were Indian political parties opposed to the prime minister's preferred course of action. The parliamentary fragility of coalition governments meant that these parties were able to variably block, water down, or delay the execution of policy responses. Importantly, Basrur notes that the initial preferred policies of decision-makers were \\\"system-driven,\\\" and would be recognized by structural realists as judicious initiatives to improve or stabilize India's international power position. The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal has been extensively covered in extant literature on contemporary Indian foreign policy, which has also established that the parliamentary opposition of both the opportunistic Bharatiya Janata Party and the anti-American Communist Party of India (Marxist) was the major cause of delays to India's approval of the deal. However, the Sri Lankan case study offers a rare cogent yet nuanced account of Indian policy toward each phase of the civil war, and how shifting domestic political forces in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu complicated India's response. The book demonstrates how India's hesitant and halting support for the Sri Lankan government, especially in the latter stages of the war, created room for China to fill this space and establish a strategic foothold in Colombo, which it continues to enjoy today. Ineffective Indian policies have therefore led to negative systemic consequences for New Delhi in its broader geopolitical competition with Beijing. The second part of the book examines cases of voluntary drift, where decision-makers face little or no meaningful domestic political constraints on their ability to devise and implement their preferred policies. Policy drift here occurs when leaders still \\\"choose options that avoid difficult and costly action, in part because the political cost of inadequate action is not severe...\",\"PeriodicalId\":53442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a911624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.a911624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着印度的决策对全球政治的影响越来越大,理解这些决策背后的影响对学者、政策专家和世界政治领导人来说变得越来越重要。拉杰什·巴斯鲁的新书《次大陆漂移:国内政治与印度外交政策》巧妙地解释了印度内部政治、外部环境和政策制定者偏好等级之间的相互作用,为印度的外交和国防政策决策提供了一个有说服力的理论。重要的是,这本书的案例选择不仅涵盖了2014年开始由纳伦德拉·莫迪领导的本届政府做出的安全政策决定,还包括过去几十年的安全政策决定。因此,本书强烈推荐给南亚研究、新兴大国和国际安全等话题的学者和新手。作为研究印度安全政策的最具思想性的学者之一,巴斯鲁尔对现有的国际关系理论流派及其对印度对外行为的解释进行了雄辩的探讨。他将新古典现实主义范式发展为一种更允许国内政治解释的理论,而不是结构现实主义的外部系统焦点。作者修改了这一范式,引入了一种分析工具来评估决策者是否在其权力范围内做出必要的决策来保护公民。这个测试本质上借鉴了现实主义思想,可以追溯到考提利亚和马基雅维利,即领导者的首要和道德义务是保护他们的臣民。正如Basrur强有力地指出的那样,在这方面找出国家失败的责任不仅对更好地制定政策至关重要,而且对弥合“学术界唯物主义/规范鸿沟”的理论发展也至关重要。因为"在重要方面,当在制定政策时忽视问责制时,道德就是经验"(第十二页)。民主领导人无法控制其国内政治背景的所有因素,对经常快速发展的区域和国际政治的影响就更小了。为了反映这一现实,Basrur将非自愿和自愿漂移的不同类别概念化(第9-10页),以解释为什么“在对国家安全至关重要的领域,不确定性和优柔优断会周期性地影响印度的外交政策”(第1-2页)。当领导人由于拥有国内否决权的参与者而无法实施有效政策时,就会发生非自愿漂移。在美印民用核协议谈判(2005-8年)和印度对斯里兰卡内战政策(1983-2009年)的两个例子中,这些否决权的参与者是反对总理首选行动方案的印度政党。联合政府在议会中的脆弱性意味着,这些政党能够以各种方式阻挠、淡化或推迟政策回应的执行。重要的是,Basrur指出,决策者最初的首选政策是“系统驱动的”,结构现实主义者将其视为改善或稳定印度国际权力地位的明智举措。美印民用核协议在当代印度外交政策的现有文献中得到了广泛的报道,这些文献还确定,机会主义的印度人民党(Bharatiya Janata Party)和反美印度共产党(马克思主义)的议会反对是印度推迟批准该协议的主要原因。然而,斯里兰卡的案例研究对印度在内战的每个阶段的政策,以及印度泰米尔纳德邦国内政治力量的变化如何使印度的反应复杂化,提供了罕见的、令人信服的、细致入微的描述。这本书展示了印度对斯里兰卡政府的犹豫和断断续续的支持,特别是在战争的后期,如何为中国填补这一空间并在科伦坡建立战略立足点创造了空间,并一直享受到今天。因此,印度无效的政策给新德里在与北京更广泛的地缘政治竞争中带来了负面的系统性后果。本书的第二部分考察了自愿漂移的案例,在这些案例中,决策者在设计和实施他们喜欢的政策时,很少或根本没有面临有意义的国内政治限制。当领导人仍然“选择避免困难和代价高昂的行动的选项,部分原因是不充分行动的政治成本并不严重……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Essence of Indecision: Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices
Essence of Indecision:Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices Frank O'Donnell (bio) As India's decisions become more consequential to global politics, understanding the influences behind them is increasingly crucial for scholars, policy experts, and world political leaders. Rajesh Basrur's new book, Subcontinental Drift: Domestic Politics and India's Foreign Policy, deftly explains the interplay of India's internal politics, external environment, and policymaker preference hierarchies to offer a persuasive theory of Indian decision-making on foreign and defense policy. Importantly, the book includes case selections that encompass security policy decisions made not only during the current government led by Narendra Modi, which began in 2014, but also during the previous several decades. As such, this book is highly recommended for both scholars and relative newcomers to the topics of South Asia studies, rising powers, and international security. As befits one of the most thoughtful scholars of India's security policies, Basrur eloquently engages with existing theoretical schools of international relations and their explanations of Indian external conduct. He develops the neoclassical realist paradigm as a theory more permissive of domestic political explanations than the external systemic focus of structural realism. The author modifies this paradigm to introduce an analytic tool of evaluating whether policymakers make the necessary decisions within their power to protect citizens. This test inherently draws upon realist thought, dating back to Kautilya and Machiavelli, that the primary—and moral—obligation of leaders is to protect their subjects. As Basrur powerfully argues, locating responsibility for state failures in this regard is crucial not just for better policymaking but for theoretical development in bridging the "materialist/normative divide in academia," as "in important respects, the moral is the empirical when accountability is neglected in making policy" (p. xii). Democratic leaders cannot control all elements of their domestic political context and have even less influence over often fast-moving developments in regional and international politics. Reflecting this reality, [End Page 129] Basrur conceptualizes the distinct categories of involuntary and voluntary drift (pp. 9–10) to explain why "uncertainty and indecisiveness have periodically afflicted India's foreign policy in areas of critical importance to its national security" (pp. 1–2). Involuntary drift occurs when leaders cannot implement effective policy due to players with domestic veto power. In the two cases of involuntary drift exemplified in negotiating the U.S.-India civil nuclear agreement (2005–8) and Indian policy toward the Sri Lankan civil war (1983–2009), these veto players were Indian political parties opposed to the prime minister's preferred course of action. The parliamentary fragility of coalition governments meant that these parties were able to variably block, water down, or delay the execution of policy responses. Importantly, Basrur notes that the initial preferred policies of decision-makers were "system-driven," and would be recognized by structural realists as judicious initiatives to improve or stabilize India's international power position. The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal has been extensively covered in extant literature on contemporary Indian foreign policy, which has also established that the parliamentary opposition of both the opportunistic Bharatiya Janata Party and the anti-American Communist Party of India (Marxist) was the major cause of delays to India's approval of the deal. However, the Sri Lankan case study offers a rare cogent yet nuanced account of Indian policy toward each phase of the civil war, and how shifting domestic political forces in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu complicated India's response. The book demonstrates how India's hesitant and halting support for the Sri Lankan government, especially in the latter stages of the war, created room for China to fill this space and establish a strategic foothold in Colombo, which it continues to enjoy today. Ineffective Indian policies have therefore led to negative systemic consequences for New Delhi in its broader geopolitical competition with Beijing. The second part of the book examines cases of voluntary drift, where decision-makers face little or no meaningful domestic political constraints on their ability to devise and implement their preferred policies. Policy drift here occurs when leaders still "choose options that avoid difficult and costly action, in part because the political cost of inadequate action is not severe...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信