{"title":"来自编辑","authors":"Rebecca R. Scott","doi":"10.5406/23288612.29.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fall 2023 issue of the Journal of Appalachian Studies features three articles with innovative perspectives on questions of perennial interest to the region. The first, entitled “Animalizing Appalachia: A Critical Animal Studies Analysis of Early Sociological Surveys of Southern Appalachia” by Corey Lee Wrenn, uses an animal-centric lens to re-examine three early sociological accounts of Appalachia: George E. Vincent's “A Retarded Frontier,” which came out in the American Journal of Sociology in 1898; John C. Campbell's Southern Highlander and His Homeland, which was published in 1921; and Mandel Sherman and Thomas R. Henry's Hollow Folk from 1933. Whereas the cultural and economic marginalization of Appalachian people in these texts has been frequently the object of analysis, the critical animal studies lens Wrenn applies to these texts deconstructs both social hierarchies and the scientific classifications that bolster them, which were produced in these early examples of social science. The categories of human and animal prove to be a rich site for the exploration of power structures and taken-for-granted elements of social order.The second article, by Sarah L. McMullen and Alison A. Ormsby, is entitled “Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Investigate Land Use History and Herbaceous Plant Diversity in Southern Appalachia.” This article uses ethnobotany, which is the study of the relationships between human societies and plants, to offer a new perspective on Appalachian regional cultures. The authors bring contemporary ethnobotany and archival research together with artistic representations, scientific accounts, and land use history to trace the history that can be found in the regional flora in the six hundred acres at Christmount Christian Assembly, located near Black Mountain, North Carolina. This research points to the valuable revitalization of local ecological knowledges and the place-based cultural practices of the Cherokee and other Indigenous peoples, emphasizes the importance of the protection of biodiversity in the Appalachian region, and offers a methodological approach to understanding natural history in other parts of the region.The third article in this issue is entitled “Fooling with Things: Affordances and Appalachian Wheelchair Users” by Zach Glendening. The prevalence of disability in Appalachia exceeds the national average by 3.5 percent, indicating that disability is an important element of Appalachian diversity. Glendening uses a critical disabilities studies framework to understand how wheelchair users in North Central Appalachia resist stigma and expand their mobility by altering the existing possibilities for action, or affordances, in their environments. Through interviews with disabled Appalachian wheelchair users, this article illustrates how people work to expand access and exceed the limitations set by things like insurance coverage and equipment failures on their ability to participate in the activities they desire within their environments. Appalachian tinkering meets disability in this study of how people in rural Appalachia make possibilities for themselves in the context of not-always-accommodating locations and resources. The author argues for considering these wheelchair users’ “fooling with things” as a kind of critical tinkering that can be located within the context of Appalachian culture and history.This issue also features a research note by Casey Jakubowski entitled “A Brief Examination of the Northernmost Appalachian Counties: Southern Tier New York.” Jakubowski notes the limited coverage that the Appalachian counties of New York have received in the Journal of Appalachian Studies and identifies various forms of commonality between these counties and the more frequently recognized parts of Southern and Central Appalachia. These range from the political (as in “Trumplandia”) to the economic and social, including attitudes toward military service and resource extraction. This research note pushes for a more inclusive definition of Appalachia, and of rurality itself, which can denaturalize the taken-for-granted borders of the region and foster more robust comparative analysis of comparable processes.This issue's book reviews include The Bootleg Coal Rebellion: The Pennsylvania Miners Who Seized an Industry, 1925–1942, written by Mitch Troutman, and reviewed by Lou Martin; Wheeling's Polonia: Reconstructing Polish Community in a West Virginia Steel Town, written by William Hal Gorby, and reviewed by Teresa Meddings; and Craft: An American History, written by Glenn Adamson, and reviewed by Philis Alvic and Thomas A. Adler.These are followed by three media reviews, which include Susan Divita's review of season 7, episode 2 of The United Shades of America, “Black in Appalachia,” hosted by W. Kamau Bell; Jimmy Dean Smith's review of the live performance film Blackalachia, directed by Moses Sumney; and Anne Ward‘s review of the online archive Digital Watauga.","PeriodicalId":93112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Editor\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca R. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/23288612.29.2.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Fall 2023 issue of the Journal of Appalachian Studies features three articles with innovative perspectives on questions of perennial interest to the region. The first, entitled “Animalizing Appalachia: A Critical Animal Studies Analysis of Early Sociological Surveys of Southern Appalachia” by Corey Lee Wrenn, uses an animal-centric lens to re-examine three early sociological accounts of Appalachia: George E. Vincent's “A Retarded Frontier,” which came out in the American Journal of Sociology in 1898; John C. Campbell's Southern Highlander and His Homeland, which was published in 1921; and Mandel Sherman and Thomas R. Henry's Hollow Folk from 1933. Whereas the cultural and economic marginalization of Appalachian people in these texts has been frequently the object of analysis, the critical animal studies lens Wrenn applies to these texts deconstructs both social hierarchies and the scientific classifications that bolster them, which were produced in these early examples of social science. The categories of human and animal prove to be a rich site for the exploration of power structures and taken-for-granted elements of social order.The second article, by Sarah L. McMullen and Alison A. Ormsby, is entitled “Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Investigate Land Use History and Herbaceous Plant Diversity in Southern Appalachia.” This article uses ethnobotany, which is the study of the relationships between human societies and plants, to offer a new perspective on Appalachian regional cultures. The authors bring contemporary ethnobotany and archival research together with artistic representations, scientific accounts, and land use history to trace the history that can be found in the regional flora in the six hundred acres at Christmount Christian Assembly, located near Black Mountain, North Carolina. This research points to the valuable revitalization of local ecological knowledges and the place-based cultural practices of the Cherokee and other Indigenous peoples, emphasizes the importance of the protection of biodiversity in the Appalachian region, and offers a methodological approach to understanding natural history in other parts of the region.The third article in this issue is entitled “Fooling with Things: Affordances and Appalachian Wheelchair Users” by Zach Glendening. The prevalence of disability in Appalachia exceeds the national average by 3.5 percent, indicating that disability is an important element of Appalachian diversity. Glendening uses a critical disabilities studies framework to understand how wheelchair users in North Central Appalachia resist stigma and expand their mobility by altering the existing possibilities for action, or affordances, in their environments. Through interviews with disabled Appalachian wheelchair users, this article illustrates how people work to expand access and exceed the limitations set by things like insurance coverage and equipment failures on their ability to participate in the activities they desire within their environments. Appalachian tinkering meets disability in this study of how people in rural Appalachia make possibilities for themselves in the context of not-always-accommodating locations and resources. The author argues for considering these wheelchair users’ “fooling with things” as a kind of critical tinkering that can be located within the context of Appalachian culture and history.This issue also features a research note by Casey Jakubowski entitled “A Brief Examination of the Northernmost Appalachian Counties: Southern Tier New York.” Jakubowski notes the limited coverage that the Appalachian counties of New York have received in the Journal of Appalachian Studies and identifies various forms of commonality between these counties and the more frequently recognized parts of Southern and Central Appalachia. These range from the political (as in “Trumplandia”) to the economic and social, including attitudes toward military service and resource extraction. This research note pushes for a more inclusive definition of Appalachia, and of rurality itself, which can denaturalize the taken-for-granted borders of the region and foster more robust comparative analysis of comparable processes.This issue's book reviews include The Bootleg Coal Rebellion: The Pennsylvania Miners Who Seized an Industry, 1925–1942, written by Mitch Troutman, and reviewed by Lou Martin; Wheeling's Polonia: Reconstructing Polish Community in a West Virginia Steel Town, written by William Hal Gorby, and reviewed by Teresa Meddings; and Craft: An American History, written by Glenn Adamson, and reviewed by Philis Alvic and Thomas A. Adler.These are followed by three media reviews, which include Susan Divita's review of season 7, episode 2 of The United Shades of America, “Black in Appalachia,” hosted by W. Kamau Bell; Jimmy Dean Smith's review of the live performance film Blackalachia, directed by Moses Sumney; and Anne Ward‘s review of the online archive Digital Watauga.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Appalachian studies\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Appalachian studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/23288612.29.2.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23288612.29.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2023年秋季出版的《阿巴拉契亚研究杂志》刊登了三篇文章,对该地区长期感兴趣的问题提出了创新的观点。第一篇题为《阿巴拉契亚的动物化:对阿巴拉契亚南部早期社会学调查的批判性动物研究分析》,作者是科里·李·雷恩,他用动物为中心的视角重新审视了阿巴拉契亚的三个早期社会学描述:乔治·e·文森特的《迟钝的边疆》,发表于1898年的《美国社会学杂志》;约翰·坎贝尔的《南方高地人和他的家园》出版于1921年;以及曼德尔·谢尔曼和托马斯·r·亨利1933年的《山谷居民》。然而,在这些文本中,阿巴拉契亚人的文化和经济边缘化经常是分析的对象,而雷恩将批判动物研究的视角应用于这些文本中,解构了社会等级制度和支撑它们的科学分类,这是在这些早期社会科学的例子中产生的。人类和动物的范畴被证明是探索权力结构和社会秩序中被视为理所当然的元素的丰富场所。第二篇文章由Sarah L. McMullen和Alison a. Ormsby撰写,题为“使用混合方法调查南阿巴拉契亚的土地利用历史和草本植物多样性”。民族植物学是研究人类社会与植物之间关系的学科,本文利用民族植物学为研究阿巴拉契亚地区文化提供了一个新的视角。作者将当代民族植物和档案研究与艺术表现、科学记载和土地使用历史结合起来,追溯了位于北卡罗来纳州黑山附近的基督山基督教大会600英亩区域植物群的历史。这项研究指出了当地生态知识和切诺基族和其他土著民族的地方文化习俗的宝贵复兴,强调了保护阿巴拉契亚地区生物多样性的重要性,并为了解该地区其他地区的自然历史提供了一种方法论方法。这期的第三篇文章是扎克·格伦德宁写的《玩弄事物:能力和阿巴拉契亚轮椅使用者》。阿巴拉契亚地区的残疾患病率比全国平均水平高出3.5%,这表明残疾是阿巴拉契亚地区多样性的一个重要组成部分。格伦丁宁使用了一个关键的残疾研究框架来了解阿巴拉契亚中北部的轮椅使用者是如何通过改变他们环境中现有的行动或便利的可能性来抵制耻辱和扩大他们的行动能力的。通过对阿巴拉契亚残疾人轮椅使用者的采访,这篇文章说明了人们如何努力扩大访问范围,并超越诸如保险范围和设备故障之类的限制,使他们能够在他们的环境中参与他们想要的活动。在阿巴拉契亚农村地区的人们如何在不总是适应的位置和资源的背景下为自己创造可能性的研究中,阿巴拉契亚人的修补遇到了残疾。作者主张将这些轮椅使用者的“玩弄东西”视为一种可以在阿巴拉契亚文化和历史背景下进行的批判性修补。这期杂志还刊登了凯西·雅库博斯基的一篇研究报告,题为“对阿巴拉契亚最北端县的简要考察:纽约南部”。Jakubowski注意到《阿巴拉契亚研究杂志》对纽约州阿巴拉契亚县的有限报道,并指出这些县与阿巴拉契亚南部和中部更常见的部分之间存在各种形式的共性。这些问题的范围从政治(如“特朗普王国”)到经济和社会,包括对服兵役和资源开采的态度。本研究报告推动了对阿巴拉契亚和乡村本身的更具包容性的定义,这可以使该地区被视为理所当然的边界变性,并促进对可比过程进行更有力的比较分析。本期书评包括:《非法煤炭叛乱:1925-1942年,宾夕法尼亚州矿工占领了一个工业》,作者:米奇·特劳特曼,书评作者:卢·马丁;威林的波洛尼亚:重建西弗吉尼亚钢铁城镇的波兰人社区,威廉·哈尔·戈比著,特蕾莎·梅丁斯评论;以及格伦·亚当森所著、菲利斯·阿尔维奇和托马斯·a·阿德勒评论的《工艺:美国历史》。随后是三篇媒体评论,其中包括苏珊·迪维塔(Susan Divita)对《美利坚合众国》(United Shades of America)第七季第二集《阿巴拉契亚的黑人》(Black in Appalachia)的评论,由w·卡茂·贝尔(W. Kamau Bell)主持;吉米·迪恩·史密斯(Jimmy Dean Smith)对摩西·萨姆尼(Moses Sumney)执导的现场表演电影《Blackalachia》的评论;以及安妮·沃德对在线档案Digital Watauga的评论。
The Fall 2023 issue of the Journal of Appalachian Studies features three articles with innovative perspectives on questions of perennial interest to the region. The first, entitled “Animalizing Appalachia: A Critical Animal Studies Analysis of Early Sociological Surveys of Southern Appalachia” by Corey Lee Wrenn, uses an animal-centric lens to re-examine three early sociological accounts of Appalachia: George E. Vincent's “A Retarded Frontier,” which came out in the American Journal of Sociology in 1898; John C. Campbell's Southern Highlander and His Homeland, which was published in 1921; and Mandel Sherman and Thomas R. Henry's Hollow Folk from 1933. Whereas the cultural and economic marginalization of Appalachian people in these texts has been frequently the object of analysis, the critical animal studies lens Wrenn applies to these texts deconstructs both social hierarchies and the scientific classifications that bolster them, which were produced in these early examples of social science. The categories of human and animal prove to be a rich site for the exploration of power structures and taken-for-granted elements of social order.The second article, by Sarah L. McMullen and Alison A. Ormsby, is entitled “Using a Mixed Methods Approach to Investigate Land Use History and Herbaceous Plant Diversity in Southern Appalachia.” This article uses ethnobotany, which is the study of the relationships between human societies and plants, to offer a new perspective on Appalachian regional cultures. The authors bring contemporary ethnobotany and archival research together with artistic representations, scientific accounts, and land use history to trace the history that can be found in the regional flora in the six hundred acres at Christmount Christian Assembly, located near Black Mountain, North Carolina. This research points to the valuable revitalization of local ecological knowledges and the place-based cultural practices of the Cherokee and other Indigenous peoples, emphasizes the importance of the protection of biodiversity in the Appalachian region, and offers a methodological approach to understanding natural history in other parts of the region.The third article in this issue is entitled “Fooling with Things: Affordances and Appalachian Wheelchair Users” by Zach Glendening. The prevalence of disability in Appalachia exceeds the national average by 3.5 percent, indicating that disability is an important element of Appalachian diversity. Glendening uses a critical disabilities studies framework to understand how wheelchair users in North Central Appalachia resist stigma and expand their mobility by altering the existing possibilities for action, or affordances, in their environments. Through interviews with disabled Appalachian wheelchair users, this article illustrates how people work to expand access and exceed the limitations set by things like insurance coverage and equipment failures on their ability to participate in the activities they desire within their environments. Appalachian tinkering meets disability in this study of how people in rural Appalachia make possibilities for themselves in the context of not-always-accommodating locations and resources. The author argues for considering these wheelchair users’ “fooling with things” as a kind of critical tinkering that can be located within the context of Appalachian culture and history.This issue also features a research note by Casey Jakubowski entitled “A Brief Examination of the Northernmost Appalachian Counties: Southern Tier New York.” Jakubowski notes the limited coverage that the Appalachian counties of New York have received in the Journal of Appalachian Studies and identifies various forms of commonality between these counties and the more frequently recognized parts of Southern and Central Appalachia. These range from the political (as in “Trumplandia”) to the economic and social, including attitudes toward military service and resource extraction. This research note pushes for a more inclusive definition of Appalachia, and of rurality itself, which can denaturalize the taken-for-granted borders of the region and foster more robust comparative analysis of comparable processes.This issue's book reviews include The Bootleg Coal Rebellion: The Pennsylvania Miners Who Seized an Industry, 1925–1942, written by Mitch Troutman, and reviewed by Lou Martin; Wheeling's Polonia: Reconstructing Polish Community in a West Virginia Steel Town, written by William Hal Gorby, and reviewed by Teresa Meddings; and Craft: An American History, written by Glenn Adamson, and reviewed by Philis Alvic and Thomas A. Adler.These are followed by three media reviews, which include Susan Divita's review of season 7, episode 2 of The United Shades of America, “Black in Appalachia,” hosted by W. Kamau Bell; Jimmy Dean Smith's review of the live performance film Blackalachia, directed by Moses Sumney; and Anne Ward‘s review of the online archive Digital Watauga.