对印度中部一家农村三级保健医院的输血申请单进行前瞻性审计,作为改进输血做法的一个步骤

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
VitaladevuniBalasubramanyam Shivkumar, VihankaDevchand Vaidya, AbhayVilas Deshmukh, ManishArun Meshram
{"title":"对印度中部一家农村三级保健医院的输血申请单进行前瞻性审计,作为改进输血做法的一个步骤","authors":"VitaladevuniBalasubramanyam Shivkumar, VihankaDevchand Vaidya, AbhayVilas Deshmukh, ManishArun Meshram","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_16_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A blood requisition form is the sign of final clinical decision for the transfusion. It provides all the clinical details of the patient. The missing and incorrect information in blood request form can be the cause of error and transfusion reactions. This study was aimed to evaluate blood transfusion request form for its correctness and completeness. Based on its findings and results, the clinicians will be asked to take corrective measures. Methods: The blood requisition forms were evaluated in the blood centre at central India during the period of October 2019 to June 2021 and were analysed. Results: 15022 blood requisition forms were received for 19904 units of blood and blood products during the study period. Majority of the requisitions were for single unit. 10.75% forms were without demographic details, 14.58% were without priority, 18.91% were without mentioning of blood group, 32.69% were without mentioning of indication, 24.23% forms were without history of previous transfusion and 23.47% forms were without proper clinical history. Conclusion: The requests for whole blood was much more than packed red cells. More than 60% forms were not properly filled and without proper clinical information. The indication for transfusion of blood and blood components were not mentioned in 33% of the forms. The forms in which indications were mentioned, more than 30% had inappropriate indications. Thus, it is important to sensitize the clinicians about the importance of correctness and completeness of blood transfusion request forms to ultimately improve the clinical practices.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective audit of requisitions for transfusion at a rural tertiary care hospital in central India as a step to improve transfusion practices\",\"authors\":\"VitaladevuniBalasubramanyam Shivkumar, VihankaDevchand Vaidya, AbhayVilas Deshmukh, ManishArun Meshram\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmms.jmms_16_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A blood requisition form is the sign of final clinical decision for the transfusion. It provides all the clinical details of the patient. The missing and incorrect information in blood request form can be the cause of error and transfusion reactions. This study was aimed to evaluate blood transfusion request form for its correctness and completeness. Based on its findings and results, the clinicians will be asked to take corrective measures. Methods: The blood requisition forms were evaluated in the blood centre at central India during the period of October 2019 to June 2021 and were analysed. Results: 15022 blood requisition forms were received for 19904 units of blood and blood products during the study period. Majority of the requisitions were for single unit. 10.75% forms were without demographic details, 14.58% were without priority, 18.91% were without mentioning of blood group, 32.69% were without mentioning of indication, 24.23% forms were without history of previous transfusion and 23.47% forms were without proper clinical history. Conclusion: The requests for whole blood was much more than packed red cells. More than 60% forms were not properly filled and without proper clinical information. The indication for transfusion of blood and blood components were not mentioned in 33% of the forms. The forms in which indications were mentioned, more than 30% had inappropriate indications. Thus, it is important to sensitize the clinicians about the importance of correctness and completeness of blood transfusion request forms to ultimately improve the clinical practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_16_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_16_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血液申请表是输血的最终临床决定的标志。它提供了病人的所有临床细节。供血要求表中信息的缺失和不正确可能是导致错误和输血反应的原因。本研究旨在评估输血申请单的正确性和完整性。根据其发现和结果,临床医生将被要求采取纠正措施。方法:对2019年10月至2021年6月印度中部血液中心的血液征用表进行评估并进行分析。结果:研究期间共收到血液及血液制品19904单位15022份血单。大多数的申请单是单单位。10.75%的病例没有人口学资料,14.58%的病例没有优先级,18.91%的病例没有提及血型,32.69%的病例没有提及适应证,24.23%的病例没有输血史,23.47%的病例没有适当的临床病史。结论:全血需求量远大于红细胞需求量。超过60%的表格没有正确填写,也没有适当的临床信息。33%的表格没有提到输血和血液成分的指征。表中提及的适应症,超过30%的适应症不适当。因此,提高临床医生对输血申请单的准确性和完整性的认识,最终提高临床实践水平是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective audit of requisitions for transfusion at a rural tertiary care hospital in central India as a step to improve transfusion practices
Introduction: A blood requisition form is the sign of final clinical decision for the transfusion. It provides all the clinical details of the patient. The missing and incorrect information in blood request form can be the cause of error and transfusion reactions. This study was aimed to evaluate blood transfusion request form for its correctness and completeness. Based on its findings and results, the clinicians will be asked to take corrective measures. Methods: The blood requisition forms were evaluated in the blood centre at central India during the period of October 2019 to June 2021 and were analysed. Results: 15022 blood requisition forms were received for 19904 units of blood and blood products during the study period. Majority of the requisitions were for single unit. 10.75% forms were without demographic details, 14.58% were without priority, 18.91% were without mentioning of blood group, 32.69% were without mentioning of indication, 24.23% forms were without history of previous transfusion and 23.47% forms were without proper clinical history. Conclusion: The requests for whole blood was much more than packed red cells. More than 60% forms were not properly filled and without proper clinical information. The indication for transfusion of blood and blood components were not mentioned in 33% of the forms. The forms in which indications were mentioned, more than 30% had inappropriate indications. Thus, it is important to sensitize the clinicians about the importance of correctness and completeness of blood transfusion request forms to ultimately improve the clinical practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信