单、双宫内人工授精技术治疗不孕症的效果

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mustajib Ali, Arunav Sharma, Rajesh Sharma
{"title":"单、双宫内人工授精技术治疗不孕症的效果","authors":"Mustajib Ali, Arunav Sharma, Rajesh Sharma","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_50_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary infertility is a serious condition that has a profound impact on the mental and physical health of the couple, and the condition forms a significant proportion of cases seeking treatment at gynecological centers across the world. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) forms the cornerstone in the management of most of such cases. However, there has been an ongoing debate regarding whether single IUI or double IUI: which is better. This randomized control trial aims at comparing the outcomes of both the techniques. Materials and Methods: In this randomized control trial, 150 couples having a valid indication for IUI were randomized into two groups. In the first group, single IUI was done at 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger, and in the second group, double IUI was done at 24 and 48 h post-HCG trigger. The outcome measured was pregnancy which was confirmed by urine pregnancy test done on the 18th day after IUI and later followed up till appearance of gestation sac with fetal pole on ultrasound. The Fisher’s exact test for statistical analysis was used to analyze the data for statistical significance. Results: In the single IUI cohort of 75 women, 11 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole). The pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 14.67% (11/75 × 100%). In the double IUI cohort of 75 women, 13 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole); the pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 17.33% (13/75 × 100%). Although the double IUI group had a higher yield of positive outcomes, the result was not statistically significant (statistic test value is 0.8242). Conclusion: The outcome of single versus double IUI is almost similar. In a resource-poor situation, it will be prudent to stick to single IUI in all cases requiring IUI. However, in a resource-rich situation, one might resort to double IUI in male factor abnormalities such as asthenozoospermia or borderline oligozoospermia.","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of single and double intrauterine insemination techniques in infertility cases\",\"authors\":\"Mustajib Ali, Arunav Sharma, Rajesh Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmms.jmms_50_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Primary infertility is a serious condition that has a profound impact on the mental and physical health of the couple, and the condition forms a significant proportion of cases seeking treatment at gynecological centers across the world. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) forms the cornerstone in the management of most of such cases. However, there has been an ongoing debate regarding whether single IUI or double IUI: which is better. This randomized control trial aims at comparing the outcomes of both the techniques. Materials and Methods: In this randomized control trial, 150 couples having a valid indication for IUI were randomized into two groups. In the first group, single IUI was done at 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger, and in the second group, double IUI was done at 24 and 48 h post-HCG trigger. The outcome measured was pregnancy which was confirmed by urine pregnancy test done on the 18th day after IUI and later followed up till appearance of gestation sac with fetal pole on ultrasound. The Fisher’s exact test for statistical analysis was used to analyze the data for statistical significance. Results: In the single IUI cohort of 75 women, 11 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole). The pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 14.67% (11/75 × 100%). In the double IUI cohort of 75 women, 13 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole); the pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 17.33% (13/75 × 100%). Although the double IUI group had a higher yield of positive outcomes, the result was not statistically significant (statistic test value is 0.8242). Conclusion: The outcome of single versus double IUI is almost similar. In a resource-poor situation, it will be prudent to stick to single IUI in all cases requiring IUI. However, in a resource-rich situation, one might resort to double IUI in male factor abnormalities such as asthenozoospermia or borderline oligozoospermia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marine Medical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_50_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_50_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性不孕症是一种严重的疾病,对夫妇的精神和身体健康有深远的影响,在世界各地的妇科中心寻求治疗的病例中,这种情况占很大比例。宫内人工授精(IUI)是大多数此类病例治疗的基石。然而,关于单次人工授精和双次人工授精孰优孰劣一直存在争议。本随机对照试验旨在比较两种技术的结果。材料与方法:在本随机对照试验中,150对具有有效IUI指征的夫妇被随机分为两组。第一组在人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)触发后36 h进行单次人工授精,第二组在HCG触发后24和48 h进行双次人工授精。结果为妊娠,经IUI后第18天尿妊娠试验确认妊娠,并随访至超声显示胎极出现妊娠囊。采用统计分析的Fisher精确检验对数据进行统计显著性分析。结果:在单次IUI队列中,75名妇女中,11名在第18天尿液β - hcg检测阳性,所有人都证实怀孕(孕囊带胎极)。妊娠阳性率为14.67% (11/75 × 100%)。在双IUI队列的75名妇女中,13名在第18天尿液β - hcg检测阳性,所有人都证实怀孕(胎囊带胎极);该队列妊娠阳性率为17.33% (13/75 × 100%)。双IUI组虽然阳性转归率较高,但结果无统计学意义(统计检验值为0.8242)。结论:单次IUI与双次IUI的结果基本相似。在资源贫乏的情况下,在所有需要IUI的情况下,坚持使用单一IUI将是谨慎的。然而,在资源丰富的情况下,对于男性因素异常,如弱精子症或边缘性少精子症,人们可能会求助于双IUI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of single and double intrauterine insemination techniques in infertility cases
Background: Primary infertility is a serious condition that has a profound impact on the mental and physical health of the couple, and the condition forms a significant proportion of cases seeking treatment at gynecological centers across the world. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) forms the cornerstone in the management of most of such cases. However, there has been an ongoing debate regarding whether single IUI or double IUI: which is better. This randomized control trial aims at comparing the outcomes of both the techniques. Materials and Methods: In this randomized control trial, 150 couples having a valid indication for IUI were randomized into two groups. In the first group, single IUI was done at 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) trigger, and in the second group, double IUI was done at 24 and 48 h post-HCG trigger. The outcome measured was pregnancy which was confirmed by urine pregnancy test done on the 18th day after IUI and later followed up till appearance of gestation sac with fetal pole on ultrasound. The Fisher’s exact test for statistical analysis was used to analyze the data for statistical significance. Results: In the single IUI cohort of 75 women, 11 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole). The pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 14.67% (11/75 × 100%). In the double IUI cohort of 75 women, 13 tested positive for urine beta-HCG on day 18 and all had confirmed pregnancy (gestational sac with fetal pole); the pregnancy positivity rate for this cohort was 17.33% (13/75 × 100%). Although the double IUI group had a higher yield of positive outcomes, the result was not statistically significant (statistic test value is 0.8242). Conclusion: The outcome of single versus double IUI is almost similar. In a resource-poor situation, it will be prudent to stick to single IUI in all cases requiring IUI. However, in a resource-rich situation, one might resort to double IUI in male factor abnormalities such as asthenozoospermia or borderline oligozoospermia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信