“坏”人没有国家:不稳定的公民身份和全球新殖民主义刑罚的新特征

IF 2.4 2区社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

British Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1093/bjc/azac103

Milena Tripkovic

{"title":"“坏”人没有国家:不稳定的公民身份和全球新殖民主义刑罚的新特征","authors":"Milena Tripkovic","doi":"10.1093/bjc/azac103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article examines instances of de jure and de facto denationalization that arise from (suspected) terrorism by analyzing penal outcomes for affected citizens. The article first exposes cases of de jure denationalization that confine citizens to global spaces and draws parallels with instances of de facto denationalization that deny repatriation from abroad. I then argue that both situations signal state’s avoidance of the duty to punish, deviate from conventional penal aspirations and engender volatile global penality. To support this argument, I explore three questions: (1) who punishes, (2) who is punished and (3) what the purpose of punishment is. I conclude by exposing the emerging features of global neo-colonial penality as they pertain to both its objects and objectives.","PeriodicalId":48244,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Criminology","volume":"307 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Country For ‘Bad’ Men: Volatile Citizenship and the Emerging Features Of Global Neo-colonial Penality\",\"authors\":\"Milena Tripkovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjc/azac103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article examines instances of de jure and de facto denationalization that arise from (suspected) terrorism by analyzing penal outcomes for affected citizens. The article first exposes cases of de jure denationalization that confine citizens to global spaces and draws parallels with instances of de facto denationalization that deny repatriation from abroad. I then argue that both situations signal state’s avoidance of the duty to punish, deviate from conventional penal aspirations and engender volatile global penality. To support this argument, I explore three questions: (1) who punishes, (2) who is punished and (3) what the purpose of punishment is. I conclude by exposing the emerging features of global neo-colonial penality as they pertain to both its objects and objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"307 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azac103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文通过分析受影响公民的刑事结果，研究了由(涉嫌)恐怖主义引起的法律上和事实上的非国家化实例。这篇文章首先揭露了将公民限制在全球空间的法律上的非国家化案例，并将其与拒绝从国外遣返的事实上的非国家化案例进行了比较。然后，我认为这两种情况都表明国家回避了惩罚的义务，偏离了传统的刑罚愿望，并导致了不稳定的全球刑罚。为了支持这一论点，我探讨了三个问题:(1)谁惩罚，(2)谁被惩罚，(3)惩罚的目的是什么。最后，我揭示了全球新殖民主义刑罚的新特征，因为它们与新殖民主义的目的和目标都有关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

No Country For ‘Bad’ Men: Volatile Citizenship and the Emerging Features Of Global Neo-colonial Penality

Abstract The article examines instances of de jure and de facto denationalization that arise from (suspected) terrorism by analyzing penal outcomes for affected citizens. The article first exposes cases of de jure denationalization that confine citizens to global spaces and draws parallels with instances of de facto denationalization that deny repatriation from abroad. I then argue that both situations signal state’s avoidance of the duty to punish, deviate from conventional penal aspirations and engender volatile global penality. To support this argument, I explore three questions: (1) who punishes, (2) who is punished and (3) what the purpose of punishment is. I conclude by exposing the emerging features of global neo-colonial penality as they pertain to both its objects and objectives.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The British Journal of Criminology: An International Review of Crime and Society is one of the world"s top criminology journals. It publishes work of the highest quality from around the world and across all areas of criminology. BJC is a valuable resource for academics and researchers in crime, whether they be from criminology, sociology, anthropology, psychology, law, economics, politics or social work, and for professionals concerned with crime, law, criminal justice, politics, and penology. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed articles, BJC contains a substantial book review section.