分析,归因和披头士

Matthew Jones, Francis Knights, Pablo Padilla, Mateo Rodríguez
{"title":"分析,归因和披头士","authors":"Matthew Jones, Francis Knights, Pablo Padilla, Mateo Rodríguez","doi":"10.3828/jbs.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collaborative workshop process that is usually part of a band’s compositional creativity means that it can be hard to disentangle which person is responsible for which style or element, and that there can be disputed claims of ownership, both creative and legal. Although the Beatles are the most canonical and best-studied pop composers of the twentieth century, there are still a number of songs to which members of the band are on record as inconsistently laying claim, assertions that are impossible to evaluate in documentary terms at this distance in time, and with memories becoming faulty. An established computational method is used here to examine and compare some of the melodic and stylistic components of Lennon and McCartney, in order to see whether clustering algorithms can provide insights into such authorship questions when working with score-based analysis.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.","PeriodicalId":498796,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Beatles Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis, attribution and the Beatles\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Jones, Francis Knights, Pablo Padilla, Mateo Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/jbs.2023.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The collaborative workshop process that is usually part of a band’s compositional creativity means that it can be hard to disentangle which person is responsible for which style or element, and that there can be disputed claims of ownership, both creative and legal. Although the Beatles are the most canonical and best-studied pop composers of the twentieth century, there are still a number of songs to which members of the band are on record as inconsistently laying claim, assertions that are impossible to evaluate in documentary terms at this distance in time, and with memories becoming faulty. An established computational method is used here to examine and compare some of the melodic and stylistic components of Lennon and McCartney, in order to see whether clustering algorithms can provide insights into such authorship questions when working with score-based analysis.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Beatles Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Beatles Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/jbs.2023.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Beatles Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/jbs.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合作工作室的过程通常是乐队创作创造力的一部分,这意味着很难区分哪个人对哪种风格或元素负责,而且可能存在争议的所有权主张,无论是创造性的还是法律的。尽管披头士乐队是二十世纪最权威、被研究得最多的流行作曲家,但仍有一些歌曲是乐队成员在录音中不一致地宣称的,这些断言在时间的距离上是不可能用纪录片的方式来评估的,而且记忆也变得有缺陷。这里使用了一种已建立的计算方法来检查和比较列侬和麦卡特尼的一些旋律和风格成分,以查看聚类算法是否可以在基于分数的分析中提供对此类作者问题的见解。本文以CC BY许可方式发布:https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis, attribution and the Beatles
The collaborative workshop process that is usually part of a band’s compositional creativity means that it can be hard to disentangle which person is responsible for which style or element, and that there can be disputed claims of ownership, both creative and legal. Although the Beatles are the most canonical and best-studied pop composers of the twentieth century, there are still a number of songs to which members of the band are on record as inconsistently laying claim, assertions that are impossible to evaluate in documentary terms at this distance in time, and with memories becoming faulty. An established computational method is used here to examine and compare some of the melodic and stylistic components of Lennon and McCartney, in order to see whether clustering algorithms can provide insights into such authorship questions when working with score-based analysis.This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信