欧盟应对危机的规则制定:能源团结原则的出现及其应用

Carl-Fredrik Bergström
{"title":"欧盟应对危机的规则制定:能源团结原则的出现及其应用","authors":"Carl-Fredrik Bergström","doi":"10.36969/njel.v6i2.25414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an overview of the legal development in the energy market, within the general EU internal market, and focuses on the emergence of the principle of energy solidarity. The process has been premised on the inclusion of Article 194 TFEU in 2009 and the resulting shift of legal basis, from Article 114 TFEU. But the significant stages are more recent. The analysis takes its starting point in the ruling by the EU Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) in Case C-848/19 P, where the Court declared the existence of a principle of energy solidarity that both EU institutions and Member States must take into account in the normal operation of the internal market. Then, the article proceeds with an empirical assessment how that ruling has been exploited by the EU Commission and Legislature. The overall conclusion is that the principle defined by the Court in the context of Article 194 TFEU has enabled the EU Legislature to push the confines of its competences and, in that way, to respond to the energy crisis.","PeriodicalId":489206,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of european law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU Rulemaking in Response to Crisis: the Emergence of the Principle of Energy Solidarity and its Use\",\"authors\":\"Carl-Fredrik Bergström\",\"doi\":\"10.36969/njel.v6i2.25414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents an overview of the legal development in the energy market, within the general EU internal market, and focuses on the emergence of the principle of energy solidarity. The process has been premised on the inclusion of Article 194 TFEU in 2009 and the resulting shift of legal basis, from Article 114 TFEU. But the significant stages are more recent. The analysis takes its starting point in the ruling by the EU Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) in Case C-848/19 P, where the Court declared the existence of a principle of energy solidarity that both EU institutions and Member States must take into account in the normal operation of the internal market. Then, the article proceeds with an empirical assessment how that ruling has been exploited by the EU Commission and Legislature. The overall conclusion is that the principle defined by the Court in the context of Article 194 TFEU has enabled the EU Legislature to push the confines of its competences and, in that way, to respond to the energy crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic journal of european law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic journal of european law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v6i2.25414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of european law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v6i2.25414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了欧盟内部市场中能源市场的法律发展,并着重介绍了能源团结原则的出现。这一进程的前提是2009年纳入了第194条TFEU,并由此改变了第114条TFEU的法律依据。但重要的阶段发生在最近。分析的起点是欧盟法院(大分庭)在C-848/19 P案中的裁决,法院宣布存在能源团结原则,欧盟机构和成员国在内部市场的正常运作中都必须考虑到这一原则。然后,文章继续对欧盟委员会和立法机构如何利用这一裁决进行实证评估。总的结论是,法院在第194条TFEU的背景下定义的原则使欧盟立法机构能够推动其权限的限制,并以这种方式应对能源危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EU Rulemaking in Response to Crisis: the Emergence of the Principle of Energy Solidarity and its Use
This article presents an overview of the legal development in the energy market, within the general EU internal market, and focuses on the emergence of the principle of energy solidarity. The process has been premised on the inclusion of Article 194 TFEU in 2009 and the resulting shift of legal basis, from Article 114 TFEU. But the significant stages are more recent. The analysis takes its starting point in the ruling by the EU Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) in Case C-848/19 P, where the Court declared the existence of a principle of energy solidarity that both EU institutions and Member States must take into account in the normal operation of the internal market. Then, the article proceeds with an empirical assessment how that ruling has been exploited by the EU Commission and Legislature. The overall conclusion is that the principle defined by the Court in the context of Article 194 TFEU has enabled the EU Legislature to push the confines of its competences and, in that way, to respond to the energy crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信