裴世乐小学教育服务区教育行政人员权力运用研究

Nirada Wechayaluck
{"title":"裴世乐小学教育服务区教育行政人员权力运用研究","authors":"Nirada Wechayaluck","doi":"10.5539/jel.v12n6p90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were 1) to study education administrators’ exertion of authority 2) to compare education administrators’ exertion of authority under Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The variables were divided by the administrators’ experiences and the sizes of the institutions. The population in this study was 1,161 education administrators and teachers. The number of the samples was 291 determined using Krejcie and Morgan Table, stratified random sample of the sizes of the institutions, and simple random sampling. The study used a 5-point rating scale questionnaire for item-objective congruence ranged between 0.80-1.00 and the reliability was at 0.962. Data analysis statistics were mean, standard deviation, t-test statistic, one-way ANOVA test, and pair difference test by Scheffe’s method. The results were found as follows. 
 
 1) In general, the level of education administrators’ exertion of authority was high. The aspect with the highest mean was the authority of information technology access (x  = 4.17), while that with the lowest mean was the authority of punishment (x  = 3.56). 
 
 2) There was no difference, in general, in the comparison of education administrators’ exertion of authority divided by work experience. However, when each aspect was considered, there were statistically significant differences in the authority of punishment and the sizes of the institutions at statistically significant level of .05.","PeriodicalId":31543,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Education Administrators’ Exertion of Authority Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 1\",\"authors\":\"Nirada Wechayaluck\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/jel.v12n6p90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives of this study were 1) to study education administrators’ exertion of authority 2) to compare education administrators’ exertion of authority under Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The variables were divided by the administrators’ experiences and the sizes of the institutions. The population in this study was 1,161 education administrators and teachers. The number of the samples was 291 determined using Krejcie and Morgan Table, stratified random sample of the sizes of the institutions, and simple random sampling. The study used a 5-point rating scale questionnaire for item-objective congruence ranged between 0.80-1.00 and the reliability was at 0.962. Data analysis statistics were mean, standard deviation, t-test statistic, one-way ANOVA test, and pair difference test by Scheffe’s method. The results were found as follows. 
 
 1) In general, the level of education administrators’ exertion of authority was high. The aspect with the highest mean was the authority of information technology access (x  = 4.17), while that with the lowest mean was the authority of punishment (x  = 3.56). 
 
 2) There was no difference, in general, in the comparison of education administrators’ exertion of authority divided by work experience. However, when each aspect was considered, there were statistically significant differences in the authority of punishment and the sizes of the institutions at statistically significant level of .05.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n6p90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of Education Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n6p90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是:(1)研究教育行政人员的行为;2)比较教育管理者的权力运用;彭世洛小学教育服务区办事处行使职权。这些变量被管理员的权限所分割;经验和机构的规模。这项研究的对象是1161名教育管理人员和教师。样本数量为291个,采用Krejcie和Morgan表、机构规模分层随机抽样和简单随机抽样。本研究采用5点评定量表,项目-客观一致性范围为0.80-1.00,信度为0.962。资料分析统计量采用均数、标准差、t检验统计量、单因素方差分析检验、配对差异检验,采用Scheffe’s方法。结果发现如下:& # x0D;& # x0D;1)总体而言,教育管理人员的水平和素质;权力的运用是很高的。均值最高的方面是信息技术获取权限(x  = 4.17),均值最低的方面是处罚权限(x  = 3.56)。& # x0D;& # x0D;2)总的来说,在教育行政人员和教师的比较中,没有什么不同;按工作经验划分的职权行使。然而,当考虑到各个方面时,惩罚的权威和机构的规模有统计学意义的差异,在统计学意义水平为0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study of Education Administrators’ Exertion of Authority Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 1
The objectives of this study were 1) to study education administrators’ exertion of authority 2) to compare education administrators’ exertion of authority under Phitsanulok Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. The variables were divided by the administrators’ experiences and the sizes of the institutions. The population in this study was 1,161 education administrators and teachers. The number of the samples was 291 determined using Krejcie and Morgan Table, stratified random sample of the sizes of the institutions, and simple random sampling. The study used a 5-point rating scale questionnaire for item-objective congruence ranged between 0.80-1.00 and the reliability was at 0.962. Data analysis statistics were mean, standard deviation, t-test statistic, one-way ANOVA test, and pair difference test by Scheffe’s method. The results were found as follows. 1) In general, the level of education administrators’ exertion of authority was high. The aspect with the highest mean was the authority of information technology access (x  = 4.17), while that with the lowest mean was the authority of punishment (x  = 3.56). 2) There was no difference, in general, in the comparison of education administrators’ exertion of authority divided by work experience. However, when each aspect was considered, there were statistically significant differences in the authority of punishment and the sizes of the institutions at statistically significant level of .05.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信