Alexandra David, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Dee Menezes, Julie Riddell, Malachi Willis, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Kirstin Mitchell, Nigel Field
{"title":"01 .在英国COVID-19大流行的第一年,报告少数性别认同的人的健康和福祉:natsalal - covid浪潮2","authors":"Alexandra David, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Dee Menezes, Julie Riddell, Malachi Willis, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Kirstin Mitchell, Nigel Field","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Introduction</h3> Evidence shows that people identifying as a sexual minority experience worse health compared to heterosexual people. We estimated health inequalities by sexual identity in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the general British population. <h3>Methods</h3> Our analysis included 6,016 sexually-experienced participants (18–59 years) participating in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative webpanel survey conducted 1-year following Britain’s first lockdown. We report age-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and age and relationship status-adjusted ORs (aAOR) for general, mental, and sexual health outcomes among sexual minorities compared to their heterosexual-identifying counterparts. <h3>Results</h3> Altogether, 96.2% participants identified as heterosexual, 1.8% as gay/lesbian, 1.4% as bisexual, and 0.7% as other. Sexual minorities were more likely to report their general health as ‘bad/very bad’. There were differences by subgroups; sexual minority women (aOR:2.5, 95% CI 1.5–3.7) and bisexual participants (aOR:2.6, 1.6–4.1) had the highest odds of reporting poor general health. Sexual minority participants were more likely to report poor mental health, with bisexual participants most like to screen positive for anxiety (GAD-2) (aOR:2.3, 1.7–3.0) and depression (PHQ-2) (aOR:1.7, 1.3–2.2), while gay/lesbian participants were most likely to report ‘always/often’ feeling lonely (aOR:1.5, 1.1–2.2). <h3>Sexual minority men (aAOR</h3> 1.7, 1.2–2.3), gay/lesbian (aAOR:1.4, 1.1–1.9) and bisexual participants (aAOR:1.6, 1.1–2.1) had highest odds of reporting dissatisfaction with their sex life. Sexual minority men (aAOR:4.1, 2.6–6.4) were more likely to report successfully accessing STI services, and twice as likely to report having tried but failed to access STI services (aAOR:2.1, 1.1–3.9), both in the past year. <h3>Discussion</h3> These data, from a national general population survey, suggest that in the year following Britain’s first lockdown, sexual minorities experienced worse health than heterosexual-identifying people, and among men, an unmet need for STI services. Whether these findings reflect existing inequalities or were exacerbated by the pandemic is unknown, but mitigation is needed.","PeriodicalId":19619,"journal":{"name":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O01 The health and wellbeing of people reporting a minority sexual identity during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Britain: natsal-COVID wave 2\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra David, Soazig Clifton, Jo Gibbs, Dee Menezes, Julie Riddell, Malachi Willis, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Kirstin Mitchell, Nigel Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Introduction</h3> Evidence shows that people identifying as a sexual minority experience worse health compared to heterosexual people. We estimated health inequalities by sexual identity in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the general British population. <h3>Methods</h3> Our analysis included 6,016 sexually-experienced participants (18–59 years) participating in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative webpanel survey conducted 1-year following Britain’s first lockdown. We report age-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and age and relationship status-adjusted ORs (aAOR) for general, mental, and sexual health outcomes among sexual minorities compared to their heterosexual-identifying counterparts. <h3>Results</h3> Altogether, 96.2% participants identified as heterosexual, 1.8% as gay/lesbian, 1.4% as bisexual, and 0.7% as other. Sexual minorities were more likely to report their general health as ‘bad/very bad’. There were differences by subgroups; sexual minority women (aOR:2.5, 95% CI 1.5–3.7) and bisexual participants (aOR:2.6, 1.6–4.1) had the highest odds of reporting poor general health. Sexual minority participants were more likely to report poor mental health, with bisexual participants most like to screen positive for anxiety (GAD-2) (aOR:2.3, 1.7–3.0) and depression (PHQ-2) (aOR:1.7, 1.3–2.2), while gay/lesbian participants were most likely to report ‘always/often’ feeling lonely (aOR:1.5, 1.1–2.2). <h3>Sexual minority men (aAOR</h3> 1.7, 1.2–2.3), gay/lesbian (aAOR:1.4, 1.1–1.9) and bisexual participants (aAOR:1.6, 1.1–2.1) had highest odds of reporting dissatisfaction with their sex life. Sexual minority men (aAOR:4.1, 2.6–6.4) were more likely to report successfully accessing STI services, and twice as likely to report having tried but failed to access STI services (aAOR:2.1, 1.1–3.9), both in the past year. <h3>Discussion</h3> These data, from a national general population survey, suggest that in the year following Britain’s first lockdown, sexual minorities experienced worse health than heterosexual-identifying people, and among men, an unmet need for STI services. Whether these findings reflect existing inequalities or were exacerbated by the pandemic is unknown, but mitigation is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-bashh-2023.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
O01 The health and wellbeing of people reporting a minority sexual identity during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Britain: natsal-COVID wave 2
Introduction
Evidence shows that people identifying as a sexual minority experience worse health compared to heterosexual people. We estimated health inequalities by sexual identity in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the general British population.
Methods
Our analysis included 6,016 sexually-experienced participants (18–59 years) participating in Natsal-COVID, a quasi-representative webpanel survey conducted 1-year following Britain’s first lockdown. We report age-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and age and relationship status-adjusted ORs (aAOR) for general, mental, and sexual health outcomes among sexual minorities compared to their heterosexual-identifying counterparts.
Results
Altogether, 96.2% participants identified as heterosexual, 1.8% as gay/lesbian, 1.4% as bisexual, and 0.7% as other. Sexual minorities were more likely to report their general health as ‘bad/very bad’. There were differences by subgroups; sexual minority women (aOR:2.5, 95% CI 1.5–3.7) and bisexual participants (aOR:2.6, 1.6–4.1) had the highest odds of reporting poor general health. Sexual minority participants were more likely to report poor mental health, with bisexual participants most like to screen positive for anxiety (GAD-2) (aOR:2.3, 1.7–3.0) and depression (PHQ-2) (aOR:1.7, 1.3–2.2), while gay/lesbian participants were most likely to report ‘always/often’ feeling lonely (aOR:1.5, 1.1–2.2).
Sexual minority men (aAOR
1.7, 1.2–2.3), gay/lesbian (aAOR:1.4, 1.1–1.9) and bisexual participants (aAOR:1.6, 1.1–2.1) had highest odds of reporting dissatisfaction with their sex life. Sexual minority men (aAOR:4.1, 2.6–6.4) were more likely to report successfully accessing STI services, and twice as likely to report having tried but failed to access STI services (aAOR:2.1, 1.1–3.9), both in the past year.
Discussion
These data, from a national general population survey, suggest that in the year following Britain’s first lockdown, sexual minorities experienced worse health than heterosexual-identifying people, and among men, an unmet need for STI services. Whether these findings reflect existing inequalities or were exacerbated by the pandemic is unknown, but mitigation is needed.