退行性二尖瓣反流术后左心室功能障碍的决定因素

A Althunayyan, S Alborikan, S Badiani, K Wong, R Uppal, N Patel, P Petersen, G Lloyd, S Bhattacharyya
{"title":"退行性二尖瓣反流术后左心室功能障碍的决定因素","authors":"A Althunayyan, S Alborikan, S Badiani, K Wong, R Uppal, N Patel, P Petersen, G Lloyd, S Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1093/ehjci/jead119.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau. Background Chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation leads to volume overload causing left ventricular (LV) enlargement and eventually LV impairment. Current guidelines determining thresholds for intervention are based on LV diameters and ejection fraction. There is sparse data examining the value of LV volumes and newer markers of LV performance on outcomes of surgery in mitral valve prolapse. Purpose Identify the best markers of LV impairment after mitral valve surgery. Methods Prospective, observational study of patients with mitral valve prolapse undergoing mitral valve surgery. Pre-operative LV diameters, volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work measured. Post-operative LV impairment defined as LVEF < 50% at 1 year post-surgery. Results Eighty-seven patients included. 13% developed post-operative LV impairment. Patients with post-operative LV dysfunction showed significantly larger indexed LV end-systolic diameters (LVESD), volumes (LVESV), lower LVEF and more abnormal GLS than patients without post-operative LV dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, indexed LVESV (Odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 – 1.23), p = 0.039) and GLS (odds ratio 1.46 (95% CI 1 – 2.14), p = 0.054) were the only independent predictors of post-operative LV dysfunction. The optimal cut-off of 36.3 ml/m2 for indexed LVESV had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 78% for detection of post-operative LV impairment. Conclusion Post-operative LV impairment is common. Indexed LV volumes (36.3ml/m2) provided the best marker of post-operative LV impairment.","PeriodicalId":11963,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Echocardiography","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of post-operative left ventricular dysfunction in degenerative mitral regurgitation\",\"authors\":\"A Althunayyan, S Alborikan, S Badiani, K Wong, R Uppal, N Patel, P Petersen, G Lloyd, S Bhattacharyya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjci/jead119.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau. Background Chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation leads to volume overload causing left ventricular (LV) enlargement and eventually LV impairment. Current guidelines determining thresholds for intervention are based on LV diameters and ejection fraction. There is sparse data examining the value of LV volumes and newer markers of LV performance on outcomes of surgery in mitral valve prolapse. Purpose Identify the best markers of LV impairment after mitral valve surgery. Methods Prospective, observational study of patients with mitral valve prolapse undergoing mitral valve surgery. Pre-operative LV diameters, volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work measured. Post-operative LV impairment defined as LVEF < 50% at 1 year post-surgery. Results Eighty-seven patients included. 13% developed post-operative LV impairment. Patients with post-operative LV dysfunction showed significantly larger indexed LV end-systolic diameters (LVESD), volumes (LVESV), lower LVEF and more abnormal GLS than patients without post-operative LV dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, indexed LVESV (Odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 – 1.23), p = 0.039) and GLS (odds ratio 1.46 (95% CI 1 – 2.14), p = 0.054) were the only independent predictors of post-operative LV dysfunction. The optimal cut-off of 36.3 ml/m2 for indexed LVESV had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 78% for detection of post-operative LV impairment. Conclusion Post-operative LV impairment is common. Indexed LV volumes (36.3ml/m2) provided the best marker of post-operative LV impairment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead119.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead119.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资金来源类型:私人资助和/或赞助。主要资金来源:沙特阿拉伯文化局。背景:慢性退行性二尖瓣反流导致容量超载,导致左室(LV)增大,最终导致左室损伤。目前确定干预阈值的指南是基于左室直径和射血分数。关于二尖瓣脱垂手术结果的左室容积和新的左室表现指标的价值研究数据很少。目的确定二尖瓣手术后左室损伤的最佳标志。方法对二尖瓣脱垂患者行二尖瓣手术进行前瞻性观察研究。测量术前左室直径、体积、射血分数(LVEF)、总纵应变(GLS)和心肌功。术后左室损伤定义为LVEF <50%在术后1年。结果纳入87例患者。13%的患者术后出现左室损伤。与无术后左室功能障碍的患者相比,术后左室收缩末直径(LVESD)、容积(LVESV)、LVEF (LVEF)和GLS异常明显增大。在多因素分析中,指数LVESV(优势比1.11 (95% CI 1.01 - 1.23), p = 0.039)和GLS(优势比1.46 (95% CI 1 - 2.14), p = 0.054)是术后左室功能障碍的唯一独立预测因子。指标LVESV的最佳临界值为36.3 ml/m2,检测术后LV损伤的敏感性为82%,特异性为78%。结论术后左室损伤较为常见。指标型左室容积(36.3ml/m2)是判断术后左室损伤的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of post-operative left ventricular dysfunction in degenerative mitral regurgitation
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): The Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau. Background Chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation leads to volume overload causing left ventricular (LV) enlargement and eventually LV impairment. Current guidelines determining thresholds for intervention are based on LV diameters and ejection fraction. There is sparse data examining the value of LV volumes and newer markers of LV performance on outcomes of surgery in mitral valve prolapse. Purpose Identify the best markers of LV impairment after mitral valve surgery. Methods Prospective, observational study of patients with mitral valve prolapse undergoing mitral valve surgery. Pre-operative LV diameters, volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work measured. Post-operative LV impairment defined as LVEF &lt; 50% at 1 year post-surgery. Results Eighty-seven patients included. 13% developed post-operative LV impairment. Patients with post-operative LV dysfunction showed significantly larger indexed LV end-systolic diameters (LVESD), volumes (LVESV), lower LVEF and more abnormal GLS than patients without post-operative LV dysfunction. In multivariate analysis, indexed LVESV (Odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 1.01 – 1.23), p = 0.039) and GLS (odds ratio 1.46 (95% CI 1 – 2.14), p = 0.054) were the only independent predictors of post-operative LV dysfunction. The optimal cut-off of 36.3 ml/m2 for indexed LVESV had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 78% for detection of post-operative LV impairment. Conclusion Post-operative LV impairment is common. Indexed LV volumes (36.3ml/m2) provided the best marker of post-operative LV impairment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Echocardiography
European Journal of Echocardiography 医学-心血管系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信