警察告密者、点灯者计划和推特:揭露美国执法中的不当行为和腐败

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
Rhon Teruelle
{"title":"警察告密者、点灯者计划和推特:揭露美国执法中的不当行为和腐败","authors":"Rhon Teruelle","doi":"10.1215/00382876-10779469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of George Floyd's senseless killing, countless individuals took to the streets to protest. Coinciding with the protests, a number of police whistleblowers utilized social media to speak out about the transgressions and brutality that they had witnessed firsthand. For these individuals, social media provides a space to voice their concerns with law enforcement in America and is a place to tell their stories and critique the police. Moreover, social media empowers whistleblowers by allowing anonymity while affording a safe space for effective community building. This article is a case study involving seven whistleblowers interviewed by the author. Social media has become the primary communication tool they use to expose malfeasance and corruption in policing. The pervasive culture of law enforcement condemns any kind of vocal critique of policing, so social media functions in strong juxtaposition to the silencing of complaints, placing it in direct opposition to the thin blue line and the blue wall of silence. This article highlights the Lamplighter Project and Twitter as resources that assist police whistleblowers who speak out against wrongdoings perpetrated by other members of law enforcement.","PeriodicalId":21946,"journal":{"name":"South Atlantic Quarterly","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Police Whistleblowers, the Lamplighter Project, and Twitter: Exposing Misconduct and Corruption in American Law Enforcement\",\"authors\":\"Rhon Teruelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00382876-10779469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of George Floyd's senseless killing, countless individuals took to the streets to protest. Coinciding with the protests, a number of police whistleblowers utilized social media to speak out about the transgressions and brutality that they had witnessed firsthand. For these individuals, social media provides a space to voice their concerns with law enforcement in America and is a place to tell their stories and critique the police. Moreover, social media empowers whistleblowers by allowing anonymity while affording a safe space for effective community building. This article is a case study involving seven whistleblowers interviewed by the author. Social media has become the primary communication tool they use to expose malfeasance and corruption in policing. The pervasive culture of law enforcement condemns any kind of vocal critique of policing, so social media functions in strong juxtaposition to the silencing of complaints, placing it in direct opposition to the thin blue line and the blue wall of silence. This article highlights the Lamplighter Project and Twitter as resources that assist police whistleblowers who speak out against wrongdoings perpetrated by other members of law enforcement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Atlantic Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Atlantic Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-10779469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Atlantic Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-10779469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于乔治·弗洛伊德毫无意义的杀戮,无数人走上街头抗议。与抗议活动同时发生的是,一些警方举报人利用社交媒体公开了他们亲眼目睹的违法行为和暴行。对于这些人来说,社交媒体提供了一个空间来表达他们对美国执法部门的担忧,也是一个讲述他们的故事和批评警察的地方。此外,社交媒体允许匿名,同时为有效的社区建设提供了安全的空间,从而赋予了举报人权力。本文是作者采访的7名举报人的个案研究。社交媒体已经成为他们用来揭露警察渎职和腐败的主要沟通工具。普遍存在的执法文化谴责对警务的任何直言不讳的批评,因此社交媒体的功能与压制投诉的强烈并列,将其置于沉默的细蓝线和蓝墙的直接对立面。这篇文章强调了Lamplighter项目和Twitter作为资源来帮助那些对其他执法人员犯下的不法行为直言不讳的警察举报人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Police Whistleblowers, the Lamplighter Project, and Twitter: Exposing Misconduct and Corruption in American Law Enforcement
As a result of George Floyd's senseless killing, countless individuals took to the streets to protest. Coinciding with the protests, a number of police whistleblowers utilized social media to speak out about the transgressions and brutality that they had witnessed firsthand. For these individuals, social media provides a space to voice their concerns with law enforcement in America and is a place to tell their stories and critique the police. Moreover, social media empowers whistleblowers by allowing anonymity while affording a safe space for effective community building. This article is a case study involving seven whistleblowers interviewed by the author. Social media has become the primary communication tool they use to expose malfeasance and corruption in policing. The pervasive culture of law enforcement condemns any kind of vocal critique of policing, so social media functions in strong juxtaposition to the silencing of complaints, placing it in direct opposition to the thin blue line and the blue wall of silence. This article highlights the Lamplighter Project and Twitter as resources that assist police whistleblowers who speak out against wrongdoings perpetrated by other members of law enforcement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Individual subscribers and institutions with electronic access can view issues of the South Atlantic Quarterly online. If you have not signed up, review the first-time access instructions. Founded amid controversy in 1901, the South Atlantic Quarterly continues to cover the beat, center and fringe, with bold analyses of the current scene—national, cultural, intellectual—worldwide. Now published exclusively in special issues, this vanguard centenarian journal is tackling embattled states, evaluating postmodernity"s influential writers and intellectuals, and examining a wide range of cultural phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信