阿拉伯 EFL 学习者写作中因果代词的非典型使用:基于语料库的研究

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Omaima Abboud
{"title":"阿拉伯 EFL 学习者写作中因果代词的非典型使用:基于语料库的研究","authors":"Omaima Abboud","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2023.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzed the atypical uses of <em>make</em> as a periphrastic causative in Arabic-speaking English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learner writing. Data from a learner corpus, <em>The Arab College Corpus</em>, were compared with data from <em>The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays</em>, from which it was found that there was an overuse of the causative <em>make</em> and a preference for verb over adjective complements. The qualitative analysis revealed that the causative <em>make</em> sometimes substituted enabling causatives such as <em>let</em> or <em>allow</em>. Some usage patterns were attributed to proficiency limitations, and other usage patterns were related to the learner's spoken native dialect, namely Spoken Palestinian Arabic (SPA). The monolingual corpus of SPA <em>Curras</em> data confirmed that the causative <em>xalla</em> had both enabling and effectuating functions, with the two meanings forming a continuum. It is proposed that this continuum is being transferred to the causative <em>make</em> by Arab EFL learners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000504/pdfft?md5=1a4262c596d852c91dde7e1e569afbba&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039023000504-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The atypical uses of causative make in Arab EFL learner writing: A corpus-based study\",\"authors\":\"Omaima Abboud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amper.2023.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyzed the atypical uses of <em>make</em> as a periphrastic causative in Arabic-speaking English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learner writing. Data from a learner corpus, <em>The Arab College Corpus</em>, were compared with data from <em>The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays</em>, from which it was found that there was an overuse of the causative <em>make</em> and a preference for verb over adjective complements. The qualitative analysis revealed that the causative <em>make</em> sometimes substituted enabling causatives such as <em>let</em> or <em>allow</em>. Some usage patterns were attributed to proficiency limitations, and other usage patterns were related to the learner's spoken native dialect, namely Spoken Palestinian Arabic (SPA). The monolingual corpus of SPA <em>Curras</em> data confirmed that the causative <em>xalla</em> had both enabling and effectuating functions, with the two meanings forming a continuum. It is proposed that this continuum is being transferred to the causative <em>make</em> by Arab EFL learners.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ampersand\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000504/pdfft?md5=1a4262c596d852c91dde7e1e569afbba&pid=1-s2.0-S2215039023000504-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ampersand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了阿拉伯语英语作为外语(EFL)的学习者在写作中将make作为periphrastic因果状语的非典型用法。研究将学习者语料库 "阿拉伯学院语料库 "中的数据与 "卢万英语母语作文语料库 "中的数据进行了比较,发现 "make "作为因果状语被过度使用,而且动词的补语比形容词的补语更受偏爱。定性分析显示,"使 "有时取代了 "让 "或 "允许 "等使能因果关系。有些使用模式是由于能力限制造成的,另一些使用模式则与学习者的母语方言有关,即巴勒斯坦阿拉伯语口语(SPA)。SPA Curras 单语语料库的数据证实,因果状语 xalla 具有使能和作用两种功能,这两种意义形成了一个连续体。研究认为,阿拉伯 EFL 学习者正在将这种连续性转移到因果使役中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The atypical uses of causative make in Arab EFL learner writing: A corpus-based study

This study analyzed the atypical uses of make as a periphrastic causative in Arabic-speaking English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learner writing. Data from a learner corpus, The Arab College Corpus, were compared with data from The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays, from which it was found that there was an overuse of the causative make and a preference for verb over adjective complements. The qualitative analysis revealed that the causative make sometimes substituted enabling causatives such as let or allow. Some usage patterns were attributed to proficiency limitations, and other usage patterns were related to the learner's spoken native dialect, namely Spoken Palestinian Arabic (SPA). The monolingual corpus of SPA Curras data confirmed that the causative xalla had both enabling and effectuating functions, with the two meanings forming a continuum. It is proposed that this continuum is being transferred to the causative make by Arab EFL learners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信