当词频满足词序:决定多重约束创造性联想的因素

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Wangbing Shen, Bernhard Hommel, Yuan Yuan, Qiping Ren, Meifeng Hua, Fang Lu
{"title":"当词频满足词序:决定多重约束创造性联想的因素","authors":"Wangbing Shen, Bernhard Hommel, Yuan Yuan, Qiping Ren, Meifeng Hua, Fang Lu","doi":"10.1080/13546783.2023.2259546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractCreative association is inherent and essential to creativity and insight. Here we utilised a Chinese compound Remote Associates Task (cRAT) to identify the potential impact of word order (i.e., solution position hereinafter) and word frequency on creative association across two behavioural experiments. Experiment 1 identified the effects of (a) word order and word frequency on cRAT-induced association without considering the specific strategies used during solving such problems and (b) their interaction not only on performance in solving the cRAT, including solution time and accuracy, but also on difficulty rating. Following a coarse-to-fine approach, Experiment 2 examined the effect of both factors on creative association determined according to each participant’s trial-by-trial reports regarding insight solution strategies. Main effects of word order and word frequency, and a two-way interaction, were found on the accuracy and self-rated difficulty. These findings shed light on creative association, multiply-constrained problem solving and constructing compounds.Keywords: Creative associationword frequencysolution positionword orderproblem solving Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Word frequency was mainly determined according to a well-known and widely used word frequency dictionary, listing more than 1.8 million Chinese words or characters, published by the Beijing Language College Institute of Language Studies (Citation1986; the English version is available from the University of Virginia). If the frequency of a word was fewer than 10 times, with a percentage of cumulative frequency less than 5% (the taken threshold of 5% is largely based on a general threshold view drawn from the widely used statistical significance of p < 0.05 in psychological studies wherein an event with a probability/frequency of occurrence of less than 5% is considered a small probability or uncommon/infrequent event. Actually, the word-frequency dictionary authors also considered a word with fewer than 10 appearances, namely, word frequency, as a low-frequency word, which is also manifested in their sampling process), it was considered a low-frequency word; otherwise, it was viewed as a high-frequency word (not fewer than 10 times), occupying more than 95% in terms of percentage of cumulative frequency. It should be noted that the selected items in this study were from an original set of 192 developed items, such that some confounding variables (e.g., chronological effect) were excluded.2 In these two experiments, participants were instructed to try their best to solve each cRAT problem and simultaneously process them. To reduce the complexity and difficulty in design and statistical analysis, the three Chinese characters of a cRAT problem was controlled (not fixed but randomly), and presented simultaneously (not sequentially).3 Here we provided a brief description on the simple effect of two-way interaction regarding accuracy, and more details can be available by contacting the first author. The results are: HHHFFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > HHHIII, HHHIFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > LLLIFF, HHHIFF > LLLIIF, HHHIIF > HHHIII, HHHIIF > HLLIII, HHHIIF > LLLIFF, HHHIIF > LLLIIF, HHLFFF > HLLIII, HHLIFF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > LLLIFF, HHLIIF > LLLIIF, HHLIII > HLLIII, HLLIFF > HLLIII, HLLFFF > HLLIII, HLLIIF > HLLIII > LLLFFF, and HLLIII > LLLIII, wherein “>” only denoting the difference between two types is greater for the former than the latter at the level of p<.05. Building on these effects, we believe that word frequency may work in a U-shaped approach rather than a linear way, which is still an open question that needs more careful evaluation in the future.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (20BXW118). The first author was also supported by the sixth high-level personnel training project in Jiangsu province (333) and the Research fund of Jiangsu Provincial Key Constructive Laboratory for Big Data of Psychology and Cognitive Science (No. 72592162002G), and Dr Yuan was funded by the Jiangsu Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 23KJB180016).","PeriodicalId":47270,"journal":{"name":"Thinking & Reasoning","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When word frequency meets word order: factors determining multiply-constrained creative association\",\"authors\":\"Wangbing Shen, Bernhard Hommel, Yuan Yuan, Qiping Ren, Meifeng Hua, Fang Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546783.2023.2259546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractCreative association is inherent and essential to creativity and insight. Here we utilised a Chinese compound Remote Associates Task (cRAT) to identify the potential impact of word order (i.e., solution position hereinafter) and word frequency on creative association across two behavioural experiments. Experiment 1 identified the effects of (a) word order and word frequency on cRAT-induced association without considering the specific strategies used during solving such problems and (b) their interaction not only on performance in solving the cRAT, including solution time and accuracy, but also on difficulty rating. Following a coarse-to-fine approach, Experiment 2 examined the effect of both factors on creative association determined according to each participant’s trial-by-trial reports regarding insight solution strategies. Main effects of word order and word frequency, and a two-way interaction, were found on the accuracy and self-rated difficulty. These findings shed light on creative association, multiply-constrained problem solving and constructing compounds.Keywords: Creative associationword frequencysolution positionword orderproblem solving Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Word frequency was mainly determined according to a well-known and widely used word frequency dictionary, listing more than 1.8 million Chinese words or characters, published by the Beijing Language College Institute of Language Studies (Citation1986; the English version is available from the University of Virginia). If the frequency of a word was fewer than 10 times, with a percentage of cumulative frequency less than 5% (the taken threshold of 5% is largely based on a general threshold view drawn from the widely used statistical significance of p < 0.05 in psychological studies wherein an event with a probability/frequency of occurrence of less than 5% is considered a small probability or uncommon/infrequent event. Actually, the word-frequency dictionary authors also considered a word with fewer than 10 appearances, namely, word frequency, as a low-frequency word, which is also manifested in their sampling process), it was considered a low-frequency word; otherwise, it was viewed as a high-frequency word (not fewer than 10 times), occupying more than 95% in terms of percentage of cumulative frequency. It should be noted that the selected items in this study were from an original set of 192 developed items, such that some confounding variables (e.g., chronological effect) were excluded.2 In these two experiments, participants were instructed to try their best to solve each cRAT problem and simultaneously process them. To reduce the complexity and difficulty in design and statistical analysis, the three Chinese characters of a cRAT problem was controlled (not fixed but randomly), and presented simultaneously (not sequentially).3 Here we provided a brief description on the simple effect of two-way interaction regarding accuracy, and more details can be available by contacting the first author. The results are: HHHFFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > HHHIII, HHHIFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > LLLIFF, HHHIFF > LLLIIF, HHHIIF > HHHIII, HHHIIF > HLLIII, HHHIIF > LLLIFF, HHHIIF > LLLIIF, HHLFFF > HLLIII, HHLIFF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > LLLIFF, HHLIIF > LLLIIF, HHLIII > HLLIII, HLLIFF > HLLIII, HLLFFF > HLLIII, HLLIIF > HLLIII > LLLFFF, and HLLIII > LLLIII, wherein “>” only denoting the difference between two types is greater for the former than the latter at the level of p<.05. Building on these effects, we believe that word frequency may work in a U-shaped approach rather than a linear way, which is still an open question that needs more careful evaluation in the future.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (20BXW118). The first author was also supported by the sixth high-level personnel training project in Jiangsu province (333) and the Research fund of Jiangsu Provincial Key Constructive Laboratory for Big Data of Psychology and Cognitive Science (No. 72592162002G), and Dr Yuan was funded by the Jiangsu Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 23KJB180016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking & Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking & Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2023.2259546\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking & Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2023.2259546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要创造性联想是创造力和洞察力的内在和必要条件。本研究采用汉语复合词远端联想任务(cRAT),在两个行为实验中确定词序(即解决方案位置)和词频对创造性联想的潜在影响。实验1确定了(a)词序和词频在不考虑解决这些问题时使用的具体策略的情况下对cRAT诱导联想的影响;(b)它们的相互作用不仅对解决cRAT的表现(包括解决时间和准确性)有影响,而且对难度评级也有影响。实验2采用从粗到精的方法,根据每个参与者关于洞察力解决策略的逐次报告,检验了这两个因素对创造性联想的影响。词序和词频对准确性和自评难度有主要影响,并存在双向交互作用。这些发现揭示了创造性联想,多重约束问题解决和构建化合物。关键词:创造性联想词频解题位置词序解题披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1词频的确定主要依据北京语言学院语言研究所出版的一部著名的、被广泛使用的收录了180多万个汉字的词频词典(Citation1986;英文版可从弗吉尼亚大学获得)。如果一个词出现的频率小于10次,累计频率的百分比小于5%(5%的阈值很大程度上是基于心理学研究中广泛使用的统计学显著性p < 0.05得出的一般阈值观点,其中发生概率/频率小于5%的事件被认为是小概率或不常见/不常见的事件。)实际上,词频词典的作者也将出现次数少于10次的词,即词频,视为低频词(这也体现在他们的采样过程中),认为是低频词;否则,它被视为高频词(不少于10次),占累积频率的百分比超过95%。值得注意的是,本研究中所选择的项目来自192个开发项目的原始集合,因此排除了一些混淆变量(例如,时间顺序效应)在这两个实验中,参与者被要求尽最大努力解决每个cRAT问题并同时处理它们。为了降低设计和统计分析的复杂性和难度,对一个cRAT问题的三个汉字进行了控制(不是固定的而是随机的),并同时(不是顺序)呈现在这里,我们简要描述了双向交互对准确性的简单影响,更多细节可以联系第一作者。结果:HHHFFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > HHHIII, HHHIFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > LLLIFF, HHHIFF > LLLIIF, HHHIIF > HHHIII, HHHIIF > HLLIII, HHHIIF > LLLIFF, HHHIIF > LLLIIF, HHLFFF > HLLIII, HHLIFF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > LLLIFF, HHLIIF > LLLIIF, HHLIII > HLLIII, HLLIFF > HLLIII, HLLFFF > HLLIII, HLLIIF > HLLIII > LLLFFF,和HLLIII > LLLIII,其中“>”只表示两种类型之间的区别是前者比后者更大层面的p < . 05。基于这些影响,我们相信词频可能以u形方式而不是线性方式工作,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题,需要在未来进行更仔细的评估。本研究得到国家社会科学基金项目(20BXW118)资助。第一作者还获得了江苏省第六期高层次人才培养项目(333)和江苏省心理与认知科学大数据建设重点实验室科研基金(No. 72592162002G)的资助,袁博士获得了江苏省高等学校江苏青蓝项目和江苏省高校自然科学基金(No. 23KJB180016)的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When word frequency meets word order: factors determining multiply-constrained creative association
AbstractCreative association is inherent and essential to creativity and insight. Here we utilised a Chinese compound Remote Associates Task (cRAT) to identify the potential impact of word order (i.e., solution position hereinafter) and word frequency on creative association across two behavioural experiments. Experiment 1 identified the effects of (a) word order and word frequency on cRAT-induced association without considering the specific strategies used during solving such problems and (b) their interaction not only on performance in solving the cRAT, including solution time and accuracy, but also on difficulty rating. Following a coarse-to-fine approach, Experiment 2 examined the effect of both factors on creative association determined according to each participant’s trial-by-trial reports regarding insight solution strategies. Main effects of word order and word frequency, and a two-way interaction, were found on the accuracy and self-rated difficulty. These findings shed light on creative association, multiply-constrained problem solving and constructing compounds.Keywords: Creative associationword frequencysolution positionword orderproblem solving Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Word frequency was mainly determined according to a well-known and widely used word frequency dictionary, listing more than 1.8 million Chinese words or characters, published by the Beijing Language College Institute of Language Studies (Citation1986; the English version is available from the University of Virginia). If the frequency of a word was fewer than 10 times, with a percentage of cumulative frequency less than 5% (the taken threshold of 5% is largely based on a general threshold view drawn from the widely used statistical significance of p < 0.05 in psychological studies wherein an event with a probability/frequency of occurrence of less than 5% is considered a small probability or uncommon/infrequent event. Actually, the word-frequency dictionary authors also considered a word with fewer than 10 appearances, namely, word frequency, as a low-frequency word, which is also manifested in their sampling process), it was considered a low-frequency word; otherwise, it was viewed as a high-frequency word (not fewer than 10 times), occupying more than 95% in terms of percentage of cumulative frequency. It should be noted that the selected items in this study were from an original set of 192 developed items, such that some confounding variables (e.g., chronological effect) were excluded.2 In these two experiments, participants were instructed to try their best to solve each cRAT problem and simultaneously process them. To reduce the complexity and difficulty in design and statistical analysis, the three Chinese characters of a cRAT problem was controlled (not fixed but randomly), and presented simultaneously (not sequentially).3 Here we provided a brief description on the simple effect of two-way interaction regarding accuracy, and more details can be available by contacting the first author. The results are: HHHFFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > HHHIII, HHHIFF > HLLIII, HHHIFF > LLLIFF, HHHIFF > LLLIIF, HHHIIF > HHHIII, HHHIIF > HLLIII, HHHIIF > LLLIFF, HHHIIF > LLLIIF, HHLFFF > HLLIII, HHLIFF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > HLLIII, HHLIIF > LLLIFF, HHLIIF > LLLIIF, HHLIII > HLLIII, HLLIFF > HLLIII, HLLFFF > HLLIII, HLLIIF > HLLIII > LLLFFF, and HLLIII > LLLIII, wherein “>” only denoting the difference between two types is greater for the former than the latter at the level of p<.05. Building on these effects, we believe that word frequency may work in a U-shaped approach rather than a linear way, which is still an open question that needs more careful evaluation in the future.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (20BXW118). The first author was also supported by the sixth high-level personnel training project in Jiangsu province (333) and the Research fund of Jiangsu Provincial Key Constructive Laboratory for Big Data of Psychology and Cognitive Science (No. 72592162002G), and Dr Yuan was funded by the Jiangsu Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province (No. 23KJB180016).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thinking & Reasoning
Thinking & Reasoning PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信