带湍流端壁边界层的低压涡轮级联的大涡流模拟

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Christian Morsbach, Michael Bergmann, Adem Tosun, Bjoern F. Klose, Edmund Kügeler, Matthias Franke
{"title":"带湍流端壁边界层的低压涡轮级联的大涡流模拟","authors":"Christian Morsbach,&nbsp;Michael Bergmann,&nbsp;Adem Tosun,&nbsp;Bjoern F. Klose,&nbsp;Edmund Kügeler,&nbsp;Matthias Franke","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of <span>\\(90\\,000\\)</span> and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and freestream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion of turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"112 1","pages":"165 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Eddy Simulation of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Turbulent End Wall Boundary Layers\",\"authors\":\"Christian Morsbach,&nbsp;Michael Bergmann,&nbsp;Adem Tosun,&nbsp;Bjoern F. Klose,&nbsp;Edmund Kügeler,&nbsp;Matthias Franke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of <span>\\\\(90\\\\,000\\\\)</span> and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and freestream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion of turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"165 - 190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了在出口雷诺数为(90\,000\)和出口马赫数为 0.6 时 MTU 161 低压涡轮机的隐式大涡度模拟(LES)和不同雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)模型的结果。LES 结果基于高阶非连续 Galerkin 方法,而 RANS 则使用经典的有限体积方法计算。论文讨论了在端壁边界层厚度和自由流湍流强度方面创建逼真的流入边界条件所采取的步骤。这是通过将总压力和温度、雷诺应力和湍流长度尺度的输入分布调整到基于傅里叶级数的合成湍流发生器来实现的。通过这一程序,在中跨叶片载荷、中跨和通道高度上的尾流总压力损失方面,可以实现与实验的极佳一致性。在验证设置的基础上,我们重点讨论了由于传入边界层和涡轮叶片的相互作用而产生的二次流结构,并将 LES 与两种常用的 RANS 模型进行了比较。由于我们能够为 LES 和 RANS 创建一致的设置,所有差异都可直接归因于物理建模问题。我们发现,在这种情况下,线性涡流粘度模型和差分雷诺应力模型以及基于相关性的最新过渡模型都无法预测中跨附近的分离诱导过渡过程。此外,正如对湍流动能和各向异性场的详细讨论所示,它们对二次流损失的预测还有待改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Large Eddy Simulation of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Turbulent End Wall Boundary Layers

Large Eddy Simulation of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Turbulent End Wall Boundary Layers

We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of \(90\,000\) and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and freestream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion of turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信