Ugwuanyi UC, Anigbo AA, Nwaribe EE, Morayo MM, Jamgbadi SS, Jubril PG, Ayogu OM, Okpata CI, Ekpendu I, Okafor N, Onobun DE, Mordi C, Arua C, Nwachukwu E
{"title":"尼日利亚中北部神经导航辅助脑肿瘤手术的六年:进展与挑战","authors":"Ugwuanyi UC, Anigbo AA, Nwaribe EE, Morayo MM, Jamgbadi SS, Jubril PG, Ayogu OM, Okpata CI, Ekpendu I, Okafor N, Onobun DE, Mordi C, Arua C, Nwachukwu E","doi":"10.33425/2639-8478.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cranial operations in general have been historically driven by sound anatomical navigation with tremendous success. However, due to the unending desire for perfection, computerized neuro-navigation-assisted cranial surgery has found global usefulness, especially in neuro-oncological services. Our initial experience and challenges with this technology was already published three years ago but it becomes expedient for an update. Aims and Objectives: To report a six-year experience with computerized neuro-navigation assistance in our neuro-oncology surgeries and services. Methodology: Retrospective review of all consecutive cases involving computer-assisted neuro-navigation diagnostic and resective brain tumor operation over a six-year period (January 2016-December 2021). Main study parameters: Clinical diagnostic procedures, operations, histological diagnosis, adjuvant treatments. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics, and results were presented accordingly. Results: Total number of cases 111, Males 70 and Females 41 (M: F = 1.7:1). Age ranges from 8 months to 80 years. The commonest presentation was headache, nausea, and vomiting. Pre-op diagnosis: Intra axial tumors 70/111 (63%), Extra axial tumors 41/111 (36%). Operations: Resection/Debulking of tumor 86/111 (77,4%), with complete EOR of 65/86 (75%). Diagnostic Biopsy 68/111 (61%) with target precision of 100%. Common Histology were Gliomas 50/111 (45%), Meningiomas 41/111 (36.9%), and Metastatic 15/111 (13.5%). Adjuvant treatments and follow-ups were advised accordingly. Conclusions: With computerized neuro-navigation assistance, a wider spectrum of brain tumors were more confidently operated, and adjuvant treatments were easily deployed in line with a precise histological diagnosis for improved neuro-oncology services. But this success was at a huge cost of adopting measures to overcome some inevitable challenges.","PeriodicalId":486309,"journal":{"name":"Cancer science & research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Six Years of Neuro-Navigation Assisted Brain Tumor Surgery North Central Nigeria: Progress and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"Ugwuanyi UC, Anigbo AA, Nwaribe EE, Morayo MM, Jamgbadi SS, Jubril PG, Ayogu OM, Okpata CI, Ekpendu I, Okafor N, Onobun DE, Mordi C, Arua C, Nwachukwu E\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-8478.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cranial operations in general have been historically driven by sound anatomical navigation with tremendous success. However, due to the unending desire for perfection, computerized neuro-navigation-assisted cranial surgery has found global usefulness, especially in neuro-oncological services. Our initial experience and challenges with this technology was already published three years ago but it becomes expedient for an update. Aims and Objectives: To report a six-year experience with computerized neuro-navigation assistance in our neuro-oncology surgeries and services. Methodology: Retrospective review of all consecutive cases involving computer-assisted neuro-navigation diagnostic and resective brain tumor operation over a six-year period (January 2016-December 2021). Main study parameters: Clinical diagnostic procedures, operations, histological diagnosis, adjuvant treatments. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics, and results were presented accordingly. Results: Total number of cases 111, Males 70 and Females 41 (M: F = 1.7:1). Age ranges from 8 months to 80 years. The commonest presentation was headache, nausea, and vomiting. Pre-op diagnosis: Intra axial tumors 70/111 (63%), Extra axial tumors 41/111 (36%). Operations: Resection/Debulking of tumor 86/111 (77,4%), with complete EOR of 65/86 (75%). Diagnostic Biopsy 68/111 (61%) with target precision of 100%. Common Histology were Gliomas 50/111 (45%), Meningiomas 41/111 (36.9%), and Metastatic 15/111 (13.5%). Adjuvant treatments and follow-ups were advised accordingly. Conclusions: With computerized neuro-navigation assistance, a wider spectrum of brain tumors were more confidently operated, and adjuvant treatments were easily deployed in line with a precise histological diagnosis for improved neuro-oncology services. But this success was at a huge cost of adopting measures to overcome some inevitable challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":486309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer science & research\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer science & research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8478.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer science & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8478.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Six Years of Neuro-Navigation Assisted Brain Tumor Surgery North Central Nigeria: Progress and Challenges
Introduction: Cranial operations in general have been historically driven by sound anatomical navigation with tremendous success. However, due to the unending desire for perfection, computerized neuro-navigation-assisted cranial surgery has found global usefulness, especially in neuro-oncological services. Our initial experience and challenges with this technology was already published three years ago but it becomes expedient for an update. Aims and Objectives: To report a six-year experience with computerized neuro-navigation assistance in our neuro-oncology surgeries and services. Methodology: Retrospective review of all consecutive cases involving computer-assisted neuro-navigation diagnostic and resective brain tumor operation over a six-year period (January 2016-December 2021). Main study parameters: Clinical diagnostic procedures, operations, histological diagnosis, adjuvant treatments. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics, and results were presented accordingly. Results: Total number of cases 111, Males 70 and Females 41 (M: F = 1.7:1). Age ranges from 8 months to 80 years. The commonest presentation was headache, nausea, and vomiting. Pre-op diagnosis: Intra axial tumors 70/111 (63%), Extra axial tumors 41/111 (36%). Operations: Resection/Debulking of tumor 86/111 (77,4%), with complete EOR of 65/86 (75%). Diagnostic Biopsy 68/111 (61%) with target precision of 100%. Common Histology were Gliomas 50/111 (45%), Meningiomas 41/111 (36.9%), and Metastatic 15/111 (13.5%). Adjuvant treatments and follow-ups were advised accordingly. Conclusions: With computerized neuro-navigation assistance, a wider spectrum of brain tumors were more confidently operated, and adjuvant treatments were easily deployed in line with a precise histological diagnosis for improved neuro-oncology services. But this success was at a huge cost of adopting measures to overcome some inevitable challenges.