{"title":"采用不同过渡过程模型分析水下岩塞爆破系统隧道内不同流型下的压力波动","authors":"Xiaoying Zhang, Yisong Wang, Tingyu Xu, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.2166/aqua.2023.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of pressure surges under various flow patterns in the tunnel of an underwater rock plug blasting system using different transition process models\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoying Zhang, Yisong Wang, Tingyu Xu, Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/aqua.2023.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of pressure surges under various flow patterns in the tunnel of an underwater rock plug blasting system using different transition process models
Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.