{"title":"职业治疗主导的计算机辅助干预对成人手、腕和前臂功能的影响:系统文献综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Margo Sheerin, Ann-Marie Morrissey, Rose Galvin, Damien Ryan, Leonora Carey, Katie Robinson","doi":"10.1177/17589983231209678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Upper extremity injuries are common, and often treated by occupational therapists. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions to guide practice is pertinent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the effectiveness of occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Methods A systematic literature search of five databases was undertaken for randomized studies examining occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions for the treatment of hand, wrist, and forearm conditions. The primary outcome was function, with secondary outcomes of pain, grip and pinch strength. The quality of the included studies was independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V2 tool. Meta-analyses were completed. Results Three randomized controlled trials were included with 176 participants. One study reported on app use on a tablet and two studies reported on computer gaming. Participants had a variety of hand and wrist diagnoses, treated both conservatively and operatively. There is limited evidence demonstrating that computer-based interventions are as effective as other occupational therapy-led interventions in improving function, pain, grip and pinch strength post-intervention, including small effect size following meta-analysis: grip strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD 0.13, 95% CI 2.63; –2.36, I 2 = 0%) and pinch strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD –0.12, 95% CI 1.25; -1.50, I 2 = 11%). Conclusions Limited evidence was found to support the use of computer-aided interventions for adults with a hand, wrist or forearm injury. Further high-quality research is recommended inclusive of a broader range of technologies and a broader range of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"26 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions on function among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Margo Sheerin, Ann-Marie Morrissey, Rose Galvin, Damien Ryan, Leonora Carey, Katie Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17589983231209678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Upper extremity injuries are common, and often treated by occupational therapists. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions to guide practice is pertinent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the effectiveness of occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Methods A systematic literature search of five databases was undertaken for randomized studies examining occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions for the treatment of hand, wrist, and forearm conditions. The primary outcome was function, with secondary outcomes of pain, grip and pinch strength. The quality of the included studies was independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V2 tool. Meta-analyses were completed. Results Three randomized controlled trials were included with 176 participants. One study reported on app use on a tablet and two studies reported on computer gaming. Participants had a variety of hand and wrist diagnoses, treated both conservatively and operatively. There is limited evidence demonstrating that computer-based interventions are as effective as other occupational therapy-led interventions in improving function, pain, grip and pinch strength post-intervention, including small effect size following meta-analysis: grip strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD 0.13, 95% CI 2.63; –2.36, I 2 = 0%) and pinch strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD –0.12, 95% CI 1.25; -1.50, I 2 = 11%). Conclusions Limited evidence was found to support the use of computer-aided interventions for adults with a hand, wrist or forearm injury. Further high-quality research is recommended inclusive of a broader range of technologies and a broader range of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983231209678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983231209678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
上肢损伤是常见的,通常由职业治疗师治疗。评估职业治疗干预的有效性以指导实践的需要是相关的。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了以职业治疗为主导的计算机辅助干预在患有手、手腕和前臂疾病的成年人中的有效性。方法对五个数据库进行系统的文献检索,以随机研究职业治疗为主导的计算机辅助干预治疗手、手腕和前臂疾病。主要结果是功能,次要结果是疼痛、握力和握力。采用Cochrane风险偏倚V2工具独立评估纳入研究的质量。完成meta分析。结果纳入3项随机对照试验,共176名受试者。一项研究报告了平板电脑上的应用程序使用情况,两项研究报告了电脑游戏。参与者有各种各样的手和手腕诊断,保守和手术治疗。有限的证据表明,基于计算机的干预与其他职业治疗主导的干预在改善干预后的功能、疼痛、握力和捏力方面同样有效,包括meta分析后的小效应:握力(固定效应模型,SMD 0.13, 95% CI 2.63;-2.36, i2 = 0%)和夹紧强度(固定效应模型,SMD -0.12, 95% CI 1.25;-1.50, i2 = 11%)。结论:有限的证据支持对手、腕或前臂损伤的成人使用计算机辅助干预。建议进一步开展高质量的研究,包括更广泛的技术和更广泛的临床和患者报告的结果测量。
Effectiveness of occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions on function among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Introduction Upper extremity injuries are common, and often treated by occupational therapists. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions to guide practice is pertinent. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the effectiveness of occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Methods A systematic literature search of five databases was undertaken for randomized studies examining occupational therapy-led computer-aided interventions for the treatment of hand, wrist, and forearm conditions. The primary outcome was function, with secondary outcomes of pain, grip and pinch strength. The quality of the included studies was independently assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V2 tool. Meta-analyses were completed. Results Three randomized controlled trials were included with 176 participants. One study reported on app use on a tablet and two studies reported on computer gaming. Participants had a variety of hand and wrist diagnoses, treated both conservatively and operatively. There is limited evidence demonstrating that computer-based interventions are as effective as other occupational therapy-led interventions in improving function, pain, grip and pinch strength post-intervention, including small effect size following meta-analysis: grip strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD 0.13, 95% CI 2.63; –2.36, I 2 = 0%) and pinch strength (Fixed Effects Model, SMD –0.12, 95% CI 1.25; -1.50, I 2 = 11%). Conclusions Limited evidence was found to support the use of computer-aided interventions for adults with a hand, wrist or forearm injury. Further high-quality research is recommended inclusive of a broader range of technologies and a broader range of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.