预测和优化肝硬化患者的非肝手术风险:来自#FGDebate的见解

IF 2.4 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rex Wan-Hin Hui, Nadir Abbas, Philip Dunne, Dhiraj Tripathi
{"title":"预测和优化肝硬化患者的非肝手术风险:来自#FGDebate的见解","authors":"Rex Wan-Hin Hui, Nadir Abbas, Philip Dunne, Dhiraj Tripathi","doi":"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PROGNOSTIC SCORES The debate kickedoff with a case presentation, followed by discussion on prognostic scores for estimating surgical risks. Among online participants, 53.2% chose the ChildTurcottePugh (CTP) or Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) scores for risk prediction. Other scores chosen included the VOCALPenn Score (26.2%), Mayo Surgical Score (16.3%) and Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) (4.3%). Most respondents chose CTP or MELD as these were familiar and triedandtested. However, neither CTP or MELD truly assesses the presence or severity of portal hypertension—the sequelae of liver disease most relevant in determining operative risks. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also proposed, given its long history in surgical risk stratification. The VOCALPenn and Mayo Surgical scores are designed for surgical risk assessment in cirrhosis. VOCALPenn is the only score to account for surgical factors, whereas the Mayo Surgical score incorporated the ASA classification. These scores were developed using retrospective data, and portal hypertension assessment may be more direct in predicting postoperative decompensation. Preoperative HVPG accurately assesses portal hypertension and has been studied for adverse outcome prediction. However, given the invasive and impractical nature of HVPG, alternatives such as liver/spleen stiffness and endoscopic ultrasoundguided portal pressure assessment were discussed. Participants agreed that these modalities have not been tested in preoperative settings and require validation. SERVICE PROVISION Discussions progressed to service provision and which clinicians should manage patients with cirrhosis undergoing nonhepatic surgery. Considering the potential role of HVPG, tertiary centres with interventional radiology expertise are required. The importance of multidisciplinary care was highlighted, as good communication between hepatologists, anaesthesiologists and surgeons would be critical. The role of allied health colleagues (ie, physiotherapists and dietitians) to provide personalised preoperative, perioperative and postoperative care was also raised.","PeriodicalId":46937,"journal":{"name":"Frontline Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting and optimising risks for non-hepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis: insights from the #FGDebate\",\"authors\":\"Rex Wan-Hin Hui, Nadir Abbas, Philip Dunne, Dhiraj Tripathi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/flgastro-2023-102510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PROGNOSTIC SCORES The debate kickedoff with a case presentation, followed by discussion on prognostic scores for estimating surgical risks. Among online participants, 53.2% chose the ChildTurcottePugh (CTP) or Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) scores for risk prediction. Other scores chosen included the VOCALPenn Score (26.2%), Mayo Surgical Score (16.3%) and Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) (4.3%). Most respondents chose CTP or MELD as these were familiar and triedandtested. However, neither CTP or MELD truly assesses the presence or severity of portal hypertension—the sequelae of liver disease most relevant in determining operative risks. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also proposed, given its long history in surgical risk stratification. The VOCALPenn and Mayo Surgical scores are designed for surgical risk assessment in cirrhosis. VOCALPenn is the only score to account for surgical factors, whereas the Mayo Surgical score incorporated the ASA classification. These scores were developed using retrospective data, and portal hypertension assessment may be more direct in predicting postoperative decompensation. Preoperative HVPG accurately assesses portal hypertension and has been studied for adverse outcome prediction. However, given the invasive and impractical nature of HVPG, alternatives such as liver/spleen stiffness and endoscopic ultrasoundguided portal pressure assessment were discussed. Participants agreed that these modalities have not been tested in preoperative settings and require validation. SERVICE PROVISION Discussions progressed to service provision and which clinicians should manage patients with cirrhosis undergoing nonhepatic surgery. Considering the potential role of HVPG, tertiary centres with interventional radiology expertise are required. The importance of multidisciplinary care was highlighted, as good communication between hepatologists, anaesthesiologists and surgeons would be critical. The role of allied health colleagues (ie, physiotherapists and dietitians) to provide personalised preoperative, perioperative and postoperative care was also raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontline Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontline Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontline Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2023-102510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting and optimising risks for non-hepatic surgery in patients with cirrhosis: insights from the #FGDebate
PROGNOSTIC SCORES The debate kickedoff with a case presentation, followed by discussion on prognostic scores for estimating surgical risks. Among online participants, 53.2% chose the ChildTurcottePugh (CTP) or Model for Endstage Liver Disease (MELD) scores for risk prediction. Other scores chosen included the VOCALPenn Score (26.2%), Mayo Surgical Score (16.3%) and Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) (4.3%). Most respondents chose CTP or MELD as these were familiar and triedandtested. However, neither CTP or MELD truly assesses the presence or severity of portal hypertension—the sequelae of liver disease most relevant in determining operative risks. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was also proposed, given its long history in surgical risk stratification. The VOCALPenn and Mayo Surgical scores are designed for surgical risk assessment in cirrhosis. VOCALPenn is the only score to account for surgical factors, whereas the Mayo Surgical score incorporated the ASA classification. These scores were developed using retrospective data, and portal hypertension assessment may be more direct in predicting postoperative decompensation. Preoperative HVPG accurately assesses portal hypertension and has been studied for adverse outcome prediction. However, given the invasive and impractical nature of HVPG, alternatives such as liver/spleen stiffness and endoscopic ultrasoundguided portal pressure assessment were discussed. Participants agreed that these modalities have not been tested in preoperative settings and require validation. SERVICE PROVISION Discussions progressed to service provision and which clinicians should manage patients with cirrhosis undergoing nonhepatic surgery. Considering the potential role of HVPG, tertiary centres with interventional radiology expertise are required. The importance of multidisciplinary care was highlighted, as good communication between hepatologists, anaesthesiologists and surgeons would be critical. The role of allied health colleagues (ie, physiotherapists and dietitians) to provide personalised preoperative, perioperative and postoperative care was also raised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontline Gastroenterology
Frontline Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles that accelerate adoption of innovative and best practice in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. Frontline Gastroenterology is especially interested in articles on multidisciplinary research and care, focusing on both retrospective assessments of novel models of care as well as putative future directions of best practice. Specifically Frontline Gastroenterology publishes articles in the domains of clinical quality, patient experience, service provision and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信