军事司法环境下的人力资源管理战略:印度尼西亚共和国最高法院高等法院国家民事设备管理研究

Zidny Taqiyya, None Asropi, Ratri Istania
{"title":"军事司法环境下的人力资源管理战略:印度尼西亚共和国最高法院高等法院国家民事设备管理研究","authors":"Zidny Taqiyya, None Asropi, Ratri Istania","doi":"10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court is a judicial institution vested with authority to exercise judicial power in four separate branches of the judiciary, namely the General Courts, Religious Courts, Administrative Courts, and Military Courts. The Military Court, in particular, serves as the judicial body responsible for upholding the law and justice for members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). Unlike the other three branches of the judiciary, the Military Court system consists of three appellate courts and one main court. The existence of these four courts is governed by Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Judiciary and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009 on the Delegation of Authority to High-Ranking Officials and Chief Justices of Appellate Courts within the Supreme Court for Signing in the Field of Personnel. However, the implementation of these regulations has still resulted in varying interpretations and paradigm differences, especially in understanding the phrase \"appellate court,\" which has been perceived as somewhat biased and not fully implemented. This is particularly evident in the coordination and management of Civil Servants (ASN), as the Supreme Court places the Main Military Court on par with the appellate courts, although in practice, the Main Military Court resembles a \"court above the appellate courts.\" This research employs a qualitative approach with a specific Case Study research method, focusing on the differential treatment of ASN members who represent a minority within the Military Judiciary. Ultimately, the study recognizes the need to bring together perspectives and unify understandings regarding the implementation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009, analyzed through the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) theory, in order to harmonize the management and governance of appellate courts. This would help eliminate disparities between the High Military Court and the Main Military Court, serving as a bridge of understanding within the Military Judiciary in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":14269,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science, Technology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Resources Management Strategy in the Military Justice Environment: Study of State Civil Apparatus Management at the High Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Zidny Taqiyya, None Asropi, Ratri Istania\",\"doi\":\"10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court is a judicial institution vested with authority to exercise judicial power in four separate branches of the judiciary, namely the General Courts, Religious Courts, Administrative Courts, and Military Courts. The Military Court, in particular, serves as the judicial body responsible for upholding the law and justice for members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). Unlike the other three branches of the judiciary, the Military Court system consists of three appellate courts and one main court. The existence of these four courts is governed by Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Judiciary and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009 on the Delegation of Authority to High-Ranking Officials and Chief Justices of Appellate Courts within the Supreme Court for Signing in the Field of Personnel. However, the implementation of these regulations has still resulted in varying interpretations and paradigm differences, especially in understanding the phrase \\\"appellate court,\\\" which has been perceived as somewhat biased and not fully implemented. This is particularly evident in the coordination and management of Civil Servants (ASN), as the Supreme Court places the Main Military Court on par with the appellate courts, although in practice, the Main Military Court resembles a \\\"court above the appellate courts.\\\" This research employs a qualitative approach with a specific Case Study research method, focusing on the differential treatment of ASN members who represent a minority within the Military Judiciary. Ultimately, the study recognizes the need to bring together perspectives and unify understandings regarding the implementation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009, analyzed through the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) theory, in order to harmonize the management and governance of appellate courts. This would help eliminate disparities between the High Military Court and the Main Military Court, serving as a bridge of understanding within the Military Judiciary in Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science, Technology and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science, Technology and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v5i5.889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最高法院是一个司法机构,有权在四个独立的司法部门行使司法权,即普通法院、宗教法院、行政法院和军事法院。特别是军事法院是负责维护印度尼西亚国家武装部队成员的法律和正义的司法机构。与其他三个司法部门不同,军事法院系统由三个上诉法院和一个主要法院组成。这四个法院的存在受1997年关于军事司法的第31号法律和2009年关于授权最高法院高级官员和上诉法院首席法官签署人事领域授权的最高法院首席法官第125号条例的管辖。然而,这些条例的执行仍然导致了不同的解释和范式差异,特别是在理解“上诉法院”一词时,被认为有些偏见,没有得到充分执行。这在公务员的协调和管理方面尤其明显,因为最高法院将主要军事法院与上诉法院置于同等地位,尽管在实践中,主要军事法院类似于“上诉法院之上的法院”。本研究采用定性方法和具体的案例研究方法,重点关注军事司法机构中代表少数群体的ASN成员的差别待遇。最后,本研究认识到有必要通过平等就业机会(EEO)理论对2009年第125号最高法院首席大法官条例的实施进行分析,以协调上诉法院的管理和治理。这将有助于消除高级军事法院和主要军事法院之间的差距,成为印度尼西亚军事司法机构内部理解的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Resources Management Strategy in the Military Justice Environment: Study of State Civil Apparatus Management at the High Court of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia
The Supreme Court is a judicial institution vested with authority to exercise judicial power in four separate branches of the judiciary, namely the General Courts, Religious Courts, Administrative Courts, and Military Courts. The Military Court, in particular, serves as the judicial body responsible for upholding the law and justice for members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI). Unlike the other three branches of the judiciary, the Military Court system consists of three appellate courts and one main court. The existence of these four courts is governed by Law Number 31 of 1997 on Military Judiciary and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009 on the Delegation of Authority to High-Ranking Officials and Chief Justices of Appellate Courts within the Supreme Court for Signing in the Field of Personnel. However, the implementation of these regulations has still resulted in varying interpretations and paradigm differences, especially in understanding the phrase "appellate court," which has been perceived as somewhat biased and not fully implemented. This is particularly evident in the coordination and management of Civil Servants (ASN), as the Supreme Court places the Main Military Court on par with the appellate courts, although in practice, the Main Military Court resembles a "court above the appellate courts." This research employs a qualitative approach with a specific Case Study research method, focusing on the differential treatment of ASN members who represent a minority within the Military Judiciary. Ultimately, the study recognizes the need to bring together perspectives and unify understandings regarding the implementation of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 125 of 2009, analyzed through the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) theory, in order to harmonize the management and governance of appellate courts. This would help eliminate disparities between the High Military Court and the Main Military Court, serving as a bridge of understanding within the Military Judiciary in Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信