E. V. Denisenko, V. L. Denisenko, Yu. M. Gain, K. G. Tsyplakov, G. D. Korobov
{"title":"不同方法治疗经括约肌肛瘘的疗效比较分析","authors":"E. V. Denisenko, V. L. Denisenko, Yu. M. Gain, K. G. Tsyplakov, G. D. Korobov","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-70-74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to assess the effectiveness late results of laser technologies in the treatment of anal fistulas compared with traditional methods (excision of the fistula followed by ligature, excision of the fistula followed by restoration of the sphincter). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a single-center retrospective study included 150 patients. Patients underwent 3 variants of surgical intervention. In the first group (50 patients), the fistula was treated with laser technology. In the 2nd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by seton, in the 3rd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by sphincteroplasty. Quality of life (according to the SF-36 school), as well as differences in the proportion of relapses on the 180th day after the surgery was carried out. RESULTS: it was revealed that higher indicators of the components of physical health (PH) (F = 11260.72 p < 0.001), as well as mental health (MN) (F = 10459.6 p < 0.001) were detected in the group of patients treated with laser technology. The calculation of significant differences in the observation groups showed that with the number of observations more than the specified one, it is possible to state a decrease in the number of relapses with the laser treatment method by 2.2 times compared with traditional methods. CONCLUSION: laser technology for anal fistulas is a progressive method that provides a significant reduce of recurrence rate, as well as improving the quality of life of patients in late postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":475026,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologiâ","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the treatment of transsphincter anal fistulas by various methods\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Denisenko, V. L. Denisenko, Yu. M. Gain, K. G. Tsyplakov, G. D. Korobov\",\"doi\":\"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-70-74\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM: to assess the effectiveness late results of laser technologies in the treatment of anal fistulas compared with traditional methods (excision of the fistula followed by ligature, excision of the fistula followed by restoration of the sphincter). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a single-center retrospective study included 150 patients. Patients underwent 3 variants of surgical intervention. In the first group (50 patients), the fistula was treated with laser technology. In the 2nd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by seton, in the 3rd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by sphincteroplasty. Quality of life (according to the SF-36 school), as well as differences in the proportion of relapses on the 180th day after the surgery was carried out. RESULTS: it was revealed that higher indicators of the components of physical health (PH) (F = 11260.72 p < 0.001), as well as mental health (MN) (F = 10459.6 p < 0.001) were detected in the group of patients treated with laser technology. The calculation of significant differences in the observation groups showed that with the number of observations more than the specified one, it is possible to state a decrease in the number of relapses with the laser treatment method by 2.2 times compared with traditional methods. CONCLUSION: laser technology for anal fistulas is a progressive method that provides a significant reduce of recurrence rate, as well as improving the quality of life of patients in late postoperative period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":475026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koloproktologiâ\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koloproktologiâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-70-74\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologiâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-3-70-74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较激光技术治疗肛瘘与传统方法(切除瘘管后结扎、切除瘘管后恢复括约肌)的后期效果。患者和方法:一项包括150例患者的单中心回顾性研究。患者接受了3种不同的手术干预。第一组(50例)采用激光技术治疗瘘管。第二组(50例)先行瘘管切除后行塞顿术,第三组(50例)先行瘘管切除后行括约肌成形术。生活质量(根据SF-36学校),以及手术后第180天复发比例的差异。结果:体质健康成分(PH)较高指标(F = 11260.72 p <0.001),以及心理健康(MN) (F = 10459.6 p <0.001),在接受激光技术治疗的患者组中检测到。观察组间显著性差异的计算表明,在观察次数超过规定次数的情况下,激光治疗方法的复发次数比传统方法减少了2.2倍。结论:激光技术治疗肛瘘是一种进步的方法,显著降低了肛瘘的复发率,提高了患者术后后期的生活质量。
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the treatment of transsphincter anal fistulas by various methods
AIM: to assess the effectiveness late results of laser technologies in the treatment of anal fistulas compared with traditional methods (excision of the fistula followed by ligature, excision of the fistula followed by restoration of the sphincter). PATIENTS AND METHODS: a single-center retrospective study included 150 patients. Patients underwent 3 variants of surgical intervention. In the first group (50 patients), the fistula was treated with laser technology. In the 2nd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by seton, in the 3rd group (50 patients), the fistula was excised followed by sphincteroplasty. Quality of life (according to the SF-36 school), as well as differences in the proportion of relapses on the 180th day after the surgery was carried out. RESULTS: it was revealed that higher indicators of the components of physical health (PH) (F = 11260.72 p < 0.001), as well as mental health (MN) (F = 10459.6 p < 0.001) were detected in the group of patients treated with laser technology. The calculation of significant differences in the observation groups showed that with the number of observations more than the specified one, it is possible to state a decrease in the number of relapses with the laser treatment method by 2.2 times compared with traditional methods. CONCLUSION: laser technology for anal fistulas is a progressive method that provides a significant reduce of recurrence rate, as well as improving the quality of life of patients in late postoperative period.