企业税收制度对未分配收益的影响:以esg评分绩效为中心

Youn Hwa Kim
{"title":"企业税收制度对未分配收益的影响:以esg评分绩效为中心","authors":"Youn Hwa Kim","doi":"10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the impact of the non-refundable tax system on corporate tax planning at the financial reporting stage. A non-refundable tax system is a system that taxes a certain amount of corporate income as additional corporate tax if it is not spent on investment, wages, etc. Therefore, this study analyzed the impact of tax avoidance to reduce the burden of the reverse tax system in anticipation of its temporary introduction on long-term decisions such as investment and wages, and the impact of ESG performance of companies subject to the reverse tax system on tax avoidance in the early planning stage. To this end, we empirically analyze the relationship between ESG performance, tax avoidance, and earnings adjustment(AEM or REM) using ESG evaluation data(integrated score and evaluation score) from the Korea ESG Institute(KCGI) for companies listed on the KRX from 2015 to 2020, when the non-refundable tax system was applied.
 First, we found that the discretionary accruals(AEM) earnings adjustment of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system is higher than that of companies not subject to the system. However, we do not find an increase in the adjustment of real activity profit (REM) between the two groups. However, it is analyzed that the non-refundable tax-eligible companies use AEM to plan for tax avoidance at the financial reporting stage when making tax planning. When analyzing the relationship between ESG performance and tax avoidance, we found that Ab_CFO is related to ESG·T and ESG·E, and AB_Dis_Exp is related to ESG·S. In other words, if the ESG rating of a company subject to the unregistered tax is high, it is interpreted that the decision to avoid taxes through REM (adjustment of earnings through real activities) is already being made at the financial reporting stage, which is consistent with some previous studies.
 By examining the profit adjustment behavior at the financial reporting stage to analyze the tax avoidance impact of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system using ESG ratings, a non-financial performance of companies, this study has practical implications in that it empirically verifies the impact of ESG-related reports, which are currently being prepared for mandatory introduction in KOSPI in a phased manner from 2025, on companies' financial reporting and tax planning.","PeriodicalId":497662,"journal":{"name":"글로벌경영학회지","volume":"47 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of tax system of corporate tax on unappropriated earnings on the Tax avoidance: Focus on ESG-Scored performance\",\"authors\":\"Youn Hwa Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the impact of the non-refundable tax system on corporate tax planning at the financial reporting stage. A non-refundable tax system is a system that taxes a certain amount of corporate income as additional corporate tax if it is not spent on investment, wages, etc. Therefore, this study analyzed the impact of tax avoidance to reduce the burden of the reverse tax system in anticipation of its temporary introduction on long-term decisions such as investment and wages, and the impact of ESG performance of companies subject to the reverse tax system on tax avoidance in the early planning stage. To this end, we empirically analyze the relationship between ESG performance, tax avoidance, and earnings adjustment(AEM or REM) using ESG evaluation data(integrated score and evaluation score) from the Korea ESG Institute(KCGI) for companies listed on the KRX from 2015 to 2020, when the non-refundable tax system was applied.
 First, we found that the discretionary accruals(AEM) earnings adjustment of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system is higher than that of companies not subject to the system. However, we do not find an increase in the adjustment of real activity profit (REM) between the two groups. However, it is analyzed that the non-refundable tax-eligible companies use AEM to plan for tax avoidance at the financial reporting stage when making tax planning. When analyzing the relationship between ESG performance and tax avoidance, we found that Ab_CFO is related to ESG·T and ESG·E, and AB_Dis_Exp is related to ESG·S. In other words, if the ESG rating of a company subject to the unregistered tax is high, it is interpreted that the decision to avoid taxes through REM (adjustment of earnings through real activities) is already being made at the financial reporting stage, which is consistent with some previous studies.
 By examining the profit adjustment behavior at the financial reporting stage to analyze the tax avoidance impact of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system using ESG ratings, a non-financial performance of companies, this study has practical implications in that it empirically verifies the impact of ESG-related reports, which are currently being prepared for mandatory introduction in KOSPI in a phased manner from 2025, on companies' financial reporting and tax planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"글로벌경영학회지\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"글로벌경영학회지\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"글로벌경영학회지","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2023.20.5.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了不退税制度对财务报告阶段企业税收筹划的影响。不退还税制是指对企业收入中未用于投资、工资等的部分征收额外法人税的制度。因此,本研究分析了在预期反向税制暂时引入的情况下,为减轻其负担而进行的避税对投资和工资等长期决策的影响,以及实施反向税制的公司在规划早期的ESG绩效对避税的影响。为此,我们利用韩国ESG研究院(KCGI)的ESG评价数据(综合得分和评价得分),对2015年至2020年韩国证券交易所(KRX)上市公司实施不退税制时的ESG绩效、避税和盈余调整(AEM或REM)之间的关系进行实证分析。首先,我们发现实行不退税制度的公司的可支配应计利润(AEM)收益调整高于不实行不退税制度的公司。然而,我们没有发现两组之间的实际活动利润(REM)调整增加。但分析认为,非退税企业在进行税务筹划时,利用AEM在财务报告阶段进行避税筹划。在分析ESG绩效与避税的关系时,我们发现Ab_CFO与ESG·T和ESG·E相关,而AB_Dis_Exp与ESG·S相关。换句话说,如果被征收未注册税的公司的ESG评级较高,则可以解释为通过REM(通过实际活动调整收益)避税的决定已经在财务报告阶段做出,这与之前的一些研究是一致的。 本研究通过对财务报告阶段的利润调整行为进行分析,利用ESG评级(企业的非财务业绩)来分析受不退还税制度约束的企业的避税影响,实证验证了目前正在准备从2025年开始分阶段强制引入KOSPI的ESG相关报告对企业财务报告和税收筹划的影响,具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of tax system of corporate tax on unappropriated earnings on the Tax avoidance: Focus on ESG-Scored performance
This study analyzes the impact of the non-refundable tax system on corporate tax planning at the financial reporting stage. A non-refundable tax system is a system that taxes a certain amount of corporate income as additional corporate tax if it is not spent on investment, wages, etc. Therefore, this study analyzed the impact of tax avoidance to reduce the burden of the reverse tax system in anticipation of its temporary introduction on long-term decisions such as investment and wages, and the impact of ESG performance of companies subject to the reverse tax system on tax avoidance in the early planning stage. To this end, we empirically analyze the relationship between ESG performance, tax avoidance, and earnings adjustment(AEM or REM) using ESG evaluation data(integrated score and evaluation score) from the Korea ESG Institute(KCGI) for companies listed on the KRX from 2015 to 2020, when the non-refundable tax system was applied. First, we found that the discretionary accruals(AEM) earnings adjustment of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system is higher than that of companies not subject to the system. However, we do not find an increase in the adjustment of real activity profit (REM) between the two groups. However, it is analyzed that the non-refundable tax-eligible companies use AEM to plan for tax avoidance at the financial reporting stage when making tax planning. When analyzing the relationship between ESG performance and tax avoidance, we found that Ab_CFO is related to ESG·T and ESG·E, and AB_Dis_Exp is related to ESG·S. In other words, if the ESG rating of a company subject to the unregistered tax is high, it is interpreted that the decision to avoid taxes through REM (adjustment of earnings through real activities) is already being made at the financial reporting stage, which is consistent with some previous studies. By examining the profit adjustment behavior at the financial reporting stage to analyze the tax avoidance impact of companies subject to the non-refundable tax system using ESG ratings, a non-financial performance of companies, this study has practical implications in that it empirically verifies the impact of ESG-related reports, which are currently being prepared for mandatory introduction in KOSPI in a phased manner from 2025, on companies' financial reporting and tax planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信