Thomas McDonnell, John Hartemink, Omar Ragy, Kathrine Parker, Meshaal Shukkur, Jecko Thachil, Durga Kanigicherla
{"title":"原发性肾病综合征预防性抗凝治疗的纵向分析:血栓栓塞并发症的低发生率","authors":"Thomas McDonnell, John Hartemink, Omar Ragy, Kathrine Parker, Meshaal Shukkur, Jecko Thachil, Durga Kanigicherla","doi":"10.1159/000534652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are a serious and potentially fatal complication of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Despite this there is a lack of evidence examining the benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation (PAC) in NS. It was our objective to review the risk factors, rates of TEEs and patterns of PAC in patients with primary NS, with the aim to provide a pragmatic approach to PAC in primary NS. Methods This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of adult patients with primary NS. Included were: biopsy proven Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (described as a combined podocytopathy cohort) plus Membranous Nephropathy (MN) over an 8-year period from a single centre. Anticoagulation practice, TEEs and longer-term outcomes were recorded. Results 54 patients with MN and 48 with podocytopathies were included. Baseline demographics and severity of NS was comparable. Those with MN were more likely to develop TEE 12(22%) vs 4(8%) (p=0.027) though this difference was predominantly seen at index diagnosis. Only 2 patients developed TEEs during active incident nephrotic syndrome. Rates of PAC were similar comparing MN (53%) and podocytopathies (58%). Those with a serum albumin < 20 g/L and HAS BLED score <3 were most likely to receive PAC (22/30, 73% in MN vs 21/30, 70% in iNS). Warfarin was the most common agent used in MN cohort 18/26 (69%) vs prophylactic dose low molecular weight heparin in the podocytopathy cohort 12/28 (43%). Discussion/Conclusion PAC practices applied in this cohort of patients were pragmatic and effective, with low TEE rates during active nephrotic syndrome.","PeriodicalId":73177,"journal":{"name":"Glomerular diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Analysis of Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: Low Incidence of Thromboembolic Complications\",\"authors\":\"Thomas McDonnell, John Hartemink, Omar Ragy, Kathrine Parker, Meshaal Shukkur, Jecko Thachil, Durga Kanigicherla\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are a serious and potentially fatal complication of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Despite this there is a lack of evidence examining the benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation (PAC) in NS. It was our objective to review the risk factors, rates of TEEs and patterns of PAC in patients with primary NS, with the aim to provide a pragmatic approach to PAC in primary NS. Methods This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of adult patients with primary NS. Included were: biopsy proven Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (described as a combined podocytopathy cohort) plus Membranous Nephropathy (MN) over an 8-year period from a single centre. Anticoagulation practice, TEEs and longer-term outcomes were recorded. Results 54 patients with MN and 48 with podocytopathies were included. Baseline demographics and severity of NS was comparable. Those with MN were more likely to develop TEE 12(22%) vs 4(8%) (p=0.027) though this difference was predominantly seen at index diagnosis. Only 2 patients developed TEEs during active incident nephrotic syndrome. Rates of PAC were similar comparing MN (53%) and podocytopathies (58%). Those with a serum albumin < 20 g/L and HAS BLED score <3 were most likely to receive PAC (22/30, 73% in MN vs 21/30, 70% in iNS). Warfarin was the most common agent used in MN cohort 18/26 (69%) vs prophylactic dose low molecular weight heparin in the podocytopathy cohort 12/28 (43%). Discussion/Conclusion PAC practices applied in this cohort of patients were pragmatic and effective, with low TEE rates during active nephrotic syndrome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glomerular diseases\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glomerular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glomerular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血栓栓塞事件(tee)是肾病综合征(NS)的一种严重且可能致命的并发症。尽管如此,仍缺乏证据证明预防性抗凝(PAC)对NS的益处。我们的目的是回顾原发性NS患者的危险因素、tee的发生率和PAC的模式,旨在为原发性NS患者的PAC提供实用的方法。方法:回顾性纵向队列研究,研究对象为原发性NS的成年患者。包括:活检证实的最小改变疾病和局灶节段性肾小球硬化(被描述为联合足细胞病队列)加上膜性肾病(MN),来自单一中心,时间超过8年。记录抗凝实践、tee和长期预后。结果54例MN患者,48例足细胞病变患者。基线人口统计学和NS严重程度具有可比性。MN患者更有可能发展为TEE 12(22%) vs 4(8%) (p=0.027),尽管这种差异主要见于指数诊断。只有2例患者在活动性偶发肾病综合征期间发生tee。PAC的发生率与MN(53%)和足细胞病变(58%)相似。血清白蛋白阳性者;20 g/L和HAS BLED评分为lt;3的患者最有可能接受PAC (MN为22/ 30,73%,iNS为21/ 30,70%)。在MN队列18/26(69%)中,华法林是最常用的药物,而在足细胞病变队列12/28(43%)中,预防剂量低分子量肝素是最常用的药物。讨论/结论在该队列患者中应用PAC实践是实用和有效的,活动性肾病综合征期间TEE发生率低。
Longitudinal Analysis of Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: Low Incidence of Thromboembolic Complications
Introduction Thromboembolic events (TEEs) are a serious and potentially fatal complication of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Despite this there is a lack of evidence examining the benefits of prophylactic anticoagulation (PAC) in NS. It was our objective to review the risk factors, rates of TEEs and patterns of PAC in patients with primary NS, with the aim to provide a pragmatic approach to PAC in primary NS. Methods This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of adult patients with primary NS. Included were: biopsy proven Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (described as a combined podocytopathy cohort) plus Membranous Nephropathy (MN) over an 8-year period from a single centre. Anticoagulation practice, TEEs and longer-term outcomes were recorded. Results 54 patients with MN and 48 with podocytopathies were included. Baseline demographics and severity of NS was comparable. Those with MN were more likely to develop TEE 12(22%) vs 4(8%) (p=0.027) though this difference was predominantly seen at index diagnosis. Only 2 patients developed TEEs during active incident nephrotic syndrome. Rates of PAC were similar comparing MN (53%) and podocytopathies (58%). Those with a serum albumin < 20 g/L and HAS BLED score <3 were most likely to receive PAC (22/30, 73% in MN vs 21/30, 70% in iNS). Warfarin was the most common agent used in MN cohort 18/26 (69%) vs prophylactic dose low molecular weight heparin in the podocytopathy cohort 12/28 (43%). Discussion/Conclusion PAC practices applied in this cohort of patients were pragmatic and effective, with low TEE rates during active nephrotic syndrome.