用统计方法评价国家偏好调查

IF 0.8 4区工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Promet-Traffic & Transportation Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.7307/ptt.v35i5.259

Tibor Sipos

{"title":"用统计方法评价国家偏好调查","authors":"Tibor Sipos","doi":"10.7307/ptt.v35i5.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modelling. The research was conducted based on artificial Monte Carlo simulated respondents, and the results were assessed with standard mathematical-statistical tools. Although the assessment should have resulted in 0% errors, according to our 2,000 sample, a minor 5% of errors occurred. The problem to be investigated in this paper is that the best-designed survey could have some errors.","PeriodicalId":54546,"journal":{"name":"Promet-Traffic & Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods\",\"authors\":\"Tibor Sipos\",\"doi\":\"10.7307/ptt.v35i5.259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modelling. The research was conducted based on artificial Monte Carlo simulated respondents, and the results were assessed with standard mathematical-statistical tools. Although the assessment should have resulted in 0% errors, according to our 2,000 sample, a minor 5% of errors occurred. The problem to be investigated in this paper is that the best-designed survey could have some errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Promet-Traffic & Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Promet-Traffic & Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i5.259\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promet-Traffic & Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v35i5.259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对交通建模中的陈述偏好调查进行了研究。本研究旨在确保陈述偏好配对比较调查的最佳分数正交设计不会增加运输相关决策模型的误差或不确定性。该研究基于人工蒙特卡罗模拟受访者，并使用标准数理统计工具对结果进行评估。虽然评估应该导致0%的错误，但根据我们的2,000个样本，发生了5%的小错误。本文要研究的问题是，设计最好的调查可能会有一些误差。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluation of Stated Preference Surveys with Statistical Methods

In this paper, the author investigated the stated preference survey in transport modelling. The research was conducted to ensure that the best fractional orthogonal design of stated preference paired comparison survey would not increase the error or uncertainty in transport-related decision modelling. The research was conducted based on artificial Monte Carlo simulated respondents, and the results were assessed with standard mathematical-statistical tools. Although the assessment should have resulted in 0% errors, according to our 2,000 sample, a minor 5% of errors occurred. The problem to be investigated in this paper is that the best-designed survey could have some errors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Promet-Traffic & Transportation 工程技术-运输科技

CiteScore

1.90

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： This scientific journal publishes scientific papers in the area of technical sciences, field of transport and traffic technology. The basic guidelines of the journal, which support the mission - promotion of transport science, are: relevancy of published papers and reviewer competency, established identity in the print and publishing profile, as well as other formal and informal details. The journal organisation consists of the Editorial Board, Editors, Reviewer Selection Committee and the Scientific Advisory Committee. The received papers are subject to peer review in accordance with the recommendations for international scientific journals. The papers published in the journal are placed in sections which explain their focus in more detail. The sections are: transportation economy, information and communication technology, intelligent transport systems, human-transport interaction, intermodal transport, education in traffic and transport, traffic planning, traffic and environment (ecology), traffic on motorways, traffic in the cities, transport and sustainable development, traffic and space, traffic infrastructure, traffic policy, transport engineering, transport law, safety and security in traffic, transport logistics, transport technology, transport telematics, internal transport, traffic management, science in traffic and transport, traffic engineering, transport in emergency situations, swarm intelligence in transportation engineering. The Journal also publishes information not subject to review, and classified under the following headings: book and other reviews, symposia, conferences and exhibitions, scientific cooperation, anniversaries, portraits, bibliographies, publisher information, news, etc.