COVID-19患者中伤寒IgM检测假阳性:COVID-19流行阶段热带国家潜在的公共卫生问题

IF 0.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Yashik Bansal, Niharika Singh, Shivani Chaudhary, Naveen Bansal
{"title":"COVID-19患者中伤寒IgM检测假阳性:COVID-19流行阶段热带国家潜在的公共卫生问题","authors":"Yashik Bansal, Niharika Singh, Shivani Chaudhary, Naveen Bansal","doi":"10.4103/ijh.ijh_70_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, reports of false-positive serological test results were reported in COVID-19 patients. Typhidot IgM test is reported in a few studies to give false-positive results in various viral illnesses in the past. The aim of this study was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital. All symptomatic patients having fever that were admitted between April 1, 2021, and July 15, 2021, with a confirmed RT-PCR-positive result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included in the study. Serological testing was done by typhoid IgM/IgG rapid diagnostic test for all SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive patients. The primary outcome studied was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate among RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. The secondary outcome studied was to determine the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR cycle threshold (CT) value and typhidot-positive result. RESULTS: Three hundred and five (17.99%) out of 1695 samples of confirmed COVID-19 patients were positive for typhoid serology by typhidot IgM test. However, upon performing Point-Biserial correlation analysis ( P = 0.832, r = 0.021), no correlation was seen between RT-PCR CT value and typhidot result. CONCLUSIONS: Typhidot test is a nonspecific diagnostic test for typhoid fever which can be false positive in COVID-19 patients. Hence, physicians should take this into consideration to avoid misdiagnosis and delay in accurate treatment of acute febrile illness cases, especially in the present scenario of COVID-19 endemicity.","PeriodicalId":53847,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False-positive typhidot IgM assay in COVID-19 patients: A potential public health problem in tropical countries during COVID-19 endemic phase\",\"authors\":\"Yashik Bansal, Niharika Singh, Shivani Chaudhary, Naveen Bansal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijh.ijh_70_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, reports of false-positive serological test results were reported in COVID-19 patients. Typhidot IgM test is reported in a few studies to give false-positive results in various viral illnesses in the past. The aim of this study was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital. All symptomatic patients having fever that were admitted between April 1, 2021, and July 15, 2021, with a confirmed RT-PCR-positive result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included in the study. Serological testing was done by typhoid IgM/IgG rapid diagnostic test for all SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive patients. The primary outcome studied was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate among RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. The secondary outcome studied was to determine the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR cycle threshold (CT) value and typhidot-positive result. RESULTS: Three hundred and five (17.99%) out of 1695 samples of confirmed COVID-19 patients were positive for typhoid serology by typhidot IgM test. However, upon performing Point-Biserial correlation analysis ( P = 0.832, r = 0.021), no correlation was seen between RT-PCR CT value and typhidot result. CONCLUSIONS: Typhidot test is a nonspecific diagnostic test for typhoid fever which can be false positive in COVID-19 patients. Hence, physicians should take this into consideration to avoid misdiagnosis and delay in accurate treatment of acute febrile illness cases, especially in the present scenario of COVID-19 endemicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijh.ijh_70_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijh.ijh_70_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始以来,陆续有患者血清学检测结果假阳性的报告。在过去的一些研究中,伤寒IgM测试报告了各种病毒性疾病的假阳性结果。本研究的目的是估计逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)确诊的COVID-19患者中伤寒IgM的阳性率。材料和方法:本研究是在一家三级保健医院进行的横断面研究。所有在2021年4月1日至2021年7月15日期间入院的有症状的发热患者,均被确诊为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2) rt - pcr阳性。对所有SARS-CoV-2 rt - pcr阳性患者采用伤寒IgM/IgG快速诊断试验进行血清学检测。研究的主要结局是估计rt - pcr确诊的COVID-19患者中斑疹伤寒IgM阳性率。次要结局研究是确定SARS-CoV-2 RT - PCR周期阈值(CT)与伤寒阳性结果的相关性。结果:1695例新冠肺炎确诊患者标本中,伤寒IgM试验伤寒血清学阳性35例(17.99%)。然而,经点双列相关分析(P = 0.832, r = 0.021), RT-PCR CT值与伤寒结果无相关性。结论:伤寒试验是一种对新冠肺炎患者伤寒可能出现假阳性的非特异性诊断试验。因此,医生应考虑到这一点,以避免误诊和延误对急性发热性疾病的准确治疗,特别是在当前COVID-19流行的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
False-positive typhidot IgM assay in COVID-19 patients: A potential public health problem in tropical countries during COVID-19 endemic phase
Abstract BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, reports of false-positive serological test results were reported in COVID-19 patients. Typhidot IgM test is reported in a few studies to give false-positive results in various viral illnesses in the past. The aim of this study was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital. All symptomatic patients having fever that were admitted between April 1, 2021, and July 15, 2021, with a confirmed RT-PCR-positive result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included in the study. Serological testing was done by typhoid IgM/IgG rapid diagnostic test for all SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive patients. The primary outcome studied was to estimate the typhidot IgM positivity rate among RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. The secondary outcome studied was to determine the correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RT PCR cycle threshold (CT) value and typhidot-positive result. RESULTS: Three hundred and five (17.99%) out of 1695 samples of confirmed COVID-19 patients were positive for typhoid serology by typhidot IgM test. However, upon performing Point-Biserial correlation analysis ( P = 0.832, r = 0.021), no correlation was seen between RT-PCR CT value and typhidot result. CONCLUSIONS: Typhidot test is a nonspecific diagnostic test for typhoid fever which can be false positive in COVID-19 patients. Hence, physicians should take this into consideration to avoid misdiagnosis and delay in accurate treatment of acute febrile illness cases, especially in the present scenario of COVID-19 endemicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信