足球训练方法论:教练的视角

Q2 Social Sciences
Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, Vicente Romo-Pérez, Victor Arufe-Giráldez, Oliver Ramos-Álvarez
{"title":"足球训练方法论:教练的视角","authors":"Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, Vicente Romo-Pérez, Victor Arufe-Giráldez, Oliver Ramos-Álvarez","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Based on the fundamental principles of training, the methodology that each coach develops in the planning of sessions can be effective in improving the performance of their athletes. Study purpose. Therefore, the general objective pursued in this study was to find out the type of work carried out by the coaching staffs in their different teams/clubs. Materials and methods. For this work, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 517 coaches from different divisions and nationalities. To characterise the sample, descriptive measures were used and Pearson’s chi-square was used to study whether there is a relationship between the variables studied. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata and statistical significance was always set at a p-value < 0.05. Results. The results indicated that the methodology preferred by the coaches for working on the technique was the Coerver and analytical methods. The global and analytical methods were the most used on average by the coaches for tactical work. The coaches, regardless of the division or category in which they train, indicated that strength is the most important capacity to work on. Conclusions. The results of this study can be very useful for future coaching staffs when distributing training sessions and workloads.","PeriodicalId":36640,"journal":{"name":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soccer Training Methodology: A Coach’s Vision\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, Vicente Romo-Pérez, Victor Arufe-Giráldez, Oliver Ramos-Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Based on the fundamental principles of training, the methodology that each coach develops in the planning of sessions can be effective in improving the performance of their athletes. Study purpose. Therefore, the general objective pursued in this study was to find out the type of work carried out by the coaching staffs in their different teams/clubs. Materials and methods. For this work, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 517 coaches from different divisions and nationalities. To characterise the sample, descriptive measures were used and Pearson’s chi-square was used to study whether there is a relationship between the variables studied. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata and statistical significance was always set at a p-value < 0.05. Results. The results indicated that the methodology preferred by the coaches for working on the technique was the Coerver and analytical methods. The global and analytical methods were the most used on average by the coaches for tactical work. The coaches, regardless of the division or category in which they train, indicated that strength is the most important capacity to work on. Conclusions. The results of this study can be very useful for future coaching staffs when distributing training sessions and workloads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.5.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。基于训练的基本原则,每个教练在训练计划中制定的方法可以有效地提高运动员的表现。研究的目的。因此,本研究的总体目标是找出教练组在不同球队/俱乐部中开展的工作类型。材料和方法。在这项工作中,对来自不同部门和国籍的517名教练员进行了描述性横断面研究。为了描述样本的特征,使用了描述性措施,并使用皮尔逊卡方来研究所研究的变量之间是否存在关系。所有统计分析均采用Stata进行,统计学显著性均设为p值<0.05. 结果。结果表明,教练员在技术工作中首选的方法是矫形法和分析法。教练在战术工作中平均使用的最多的是全局法和分析法。这些教练,不管他们在哪个部门或类别进行训练,都表明力量是最重要的训练能力。结论。这项研究的结果对未来教练组在分配训练课程和工作量时非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soccer Training Methodology: A Coach’s Vision
Background. Based on the fundamental principles of training, the methodology that each coach develops in the planning of sessions can be effective in improving the performance of their athletes. Study purpose. Therefore, the general objective pursued in this study was to find out the type of work carried out by the coaching staffs in their different teams/clubs. Materials and methods. For this work, a descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of 517 coaches from different divisions and nationalities. To characterise the sample, descriptive measures were used and Pearson’s chi-square was used to study whether there is a relationship between the variables studied. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata and statistical significance was always set at a p-value < 0.05. Results. The results indicated that the methodology preferred by the coaches for working on the technique was the Coerver and analytical methods. The global and analytical methods were the most used on average by the coaches for tactical work. The coaches, regardless of the division or category in which they train, indicated that strength is the most important capacity to work on. Conclusions. The results of this study can be very useful for future coaching staffs when distributing training sessions and workloads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna
Teoria ta Metodika Fizicnogo Vihovanna Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信