术后口腔护理路径在口腔粘膜收获时不需要

Kevin Krughoff, Jordan Foreman, Thomas Dvergsten, Andrew C. Peterson
{"title":"术后口腔护理路径在口腔粘膜收获时不需要","authors":"Kevin Krughoff, Jordan Foreman, Thomas Dvergsten, Andrew C. Peterson","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: For patients undergoing urethroplasty with buccal mucosa grafting, the impact of oral care pathways on infection and pain control remains unstudied. We hypothesize that the elimination of dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens from the oral care pathway would not alter the rate of donor site complications. Materials and Methods: One hundred urethroplasty cases using buccal mucosa were retrospectively reviewed for donor site and perineal wound complications. No preoperative or intraoperative antibiotic oral cleanses were used in any case. Records were categorized by use of postoperative dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens. Graft harvest size, preexisting oral issues, baseline comorbidities, dental assessments, perioperative antibiotics, and postoperative pain control regimens were accounted for. Results: Forty patients were included in the oral care pathway and 60 in the nonoral care pathway. Baseline demographics, dental assessment, and graft harvest details were similar between groups. There were no cases of graft site infection, with a median follow-up of 226 days. All graft site issues resolved in 3 to 4 weeks or less. Perineal wound infections for oral care pathway 2 (5%), and no oral care pathway 4 (6.7%), P = .6. Urinary tract infections for oral care pathway 7 (17.5%), and no oral care pathway 2 (3.3%), P = .027. Conclusions: Postoperative oral complications remain low without the use of oral cleanses, dietary restrictions, or mouthwash regimens. Routine use of donor site care pathways is likely unnecessary in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"36 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Oral Care Pathways Are Not Required at the Time of Buccal Mucosa Harvest\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Krughoff, Jordan Foreman, Thomas Dvergsten, Andrew C. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: For patients undergoing urethroplasty with buccal mucosa grafting, the impact of oral care pathways on infection and pain control remains unstudied. We hypothesize that the elimination of dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens from the oral care pathway would not alter the rate of donor site complications. Materials and Methods: One hundred urethroplasty cases using buccal mucosa were retrospectively reviewed for donor site and perineal wound complications. No preoperative or intraoperative antibiotic oral cleanses were used in any case. Records were categorized by use of postoperative dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens. Graft harvest size, preexisting oral issues, baseline comorbidities, dental assessments, perioperative antibiotics, and postoperative pain control regimens were accounted for. Results: Forty patients were included in the oral care pathway and 60 in the nonoral care pathway. Baseline demographics, dental assessment, and graft harvest details were similar between groups. There were no cases of graft site infection, with a median follow-up of 226 days. All graft site issues resolved in 3 to 4 weeks or less. Perineal wound infections for oral care pathway 2 (5%), and no oral care pathway 4 (6.7%), P = .6. Urinary tract infections for oral care pathway 7 (17.5%), and no oral care pathway 2 (3.3%), P = .027. Conclusions: Postoperative oral complications remain low without the use of oral cleanses, dietary restrictions, or mouthwash regimens. Routine use of donor site care pathways is likely unnecessary in this patient population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JU open plus\",\"volume\":\"36 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JU open plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:对于尿道成形术合并颊黏膜移植的患者,口腔护理途径对感染和疼痛控制的影响尚不清楚。我们假设,从口腔护理途径中消除饮食限制和漱口方案不会改变供体部位并发症的发生率。材料与方法:回顾性分析100例颊粘膜尿道成形术的供区及会阴伤口并发症。在任何情况下,术前或术中均未使用抗生素口腔洗液。记录按术后饮食限制和漱口方案进行分类。移植的大小,先前存在的口腔问题,基线合并症,牙科评估,围手术期抗生素和术后疼痛控制方案被考虑在内。结果:40例患者采用口腔护理途径,60例患者采用非口腔护理途径。基线人口统计、牙科评估和移植手术细节在两组之间相似。无移植物感染病例,中位随访226天。所有移植物部位问题在3 - 4周或更短时间内解决。会阴创面感染有口腔护理途径2者(5%),无口腔护理途径4者(6.7%),P = 0.6。口腔护理途径7泌尿系感染(17.5%),无口腔护理途径2泌尿系感染(3.3%),P = 0.027。结论:在没有使用口腔清洁、饮食限制或漱口方案的情况下,术后口腔并发症仍然很低。在这一患者群体中,常规使用供体部位护理途径可能是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Oral Care Pathways Are Not Required at the Time of Buccal Mucosa Harvest
Purpose: For patients undergoing urethroplasty with buccal mucosa grafting, the impact of oral care pathways on infection and pain control remains unstudied. We hypothesize that the elimination of dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens from the oral care pathway would not alter the rate of donor site complications. Materials and Methods: One hundred urethroplasty cases using buccal mucosa were retrospectively reviewed for donor site and perineal wound complications. No preoperative or intraoperative antibiotic oral cleanses were used in any case. Records were categorized by use of postoperative dietary restrictions and mouthwash regimens. Graft harvest size, preexisting oral issues, baseline comorbidities, dental assessments, perioperative antibiotics, and postoperative pain control regimens were accounted for. Results: Forty patients were included in the oral care pathway and 60 in the nonoral care pathway. Baseline demographics, dental assessment, and graft harvest details were similar between groups. There were no cases of graft site infection, with a median follow-up of 226 days. All graft site issues resolved in 3 to 4 weeks or less. Perineal wound infections for oral care pathway 2 (5%), and no oral care pathway 4 (6.7%), P = .6. Urinary tract infections for oral care pathway 7 (17.5%), and no oral care pathway 2 (3.3%), P = .027. Conclusions: Postoperative oral complications remain low without the use of oral cleanses, dietary restrictions, or mouthwash regimens. Routine use of donor site care pathways is likely unnecessary in this patient population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信