直觉命题逻辑的卡尔纳普问题

IF 0.4 Q4 LOGIC
Haotian Tong, Dag Westerståhl
{"title":"直觉命题逻辑的卡尔纳普问题","authors":"Haotian Tong, Dag Westerståhl","doi":"10.3390/logics1040009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that intuitionistic propositional logic is Carnap categorical: the only interpretation of the connectives consistent with the intuitionistic consequence relation is the standard interpretation. This holds with respect to the most well-known semantics relative to which intuitionistic logic is sound and complete; among them Kripke semantics, Beth semantics, Dragalin semantics, topological semantics, and algebraic semantics. These facts turn out to be consequences of an observation about interpretations in Heyting algebras.","PeriodicalId":52270,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Logics","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carnap’s Problem for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic\",\"authors\":\"Haotian Tong, Dag Westerståhl\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/logics1040009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that intuitionistic propositional logic is Carnap categorical: the only interpretation of the connectives consistent with the intuitionistic consequence relation is the standard interpretation. This holds with respect to the most well-known semantics relative to which intuitionistic logic is sound and complete; among them Kripke semantics, Beth semantics, Dragalin semantics, topological semantics, and algebraic semantics. These facts turn out to be consequences of an observation about interpretations in Heyting algebras.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Logics\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Logics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/logics1040009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Logics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/logics1040009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们证明了直觉命题逻辑是卡尔纳普直言式的:对符合直觉推理关系的连接词的唯一解释是标准解释。这适用于最著名的语义学,直觉逻辑相对于语义学是健全和完整的;其中有Kripke语义、Beth语义、Dragalin语义、拓扑语义和代数语义。这些事实原来是对和亭代数解释的观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carnap’s Problem for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic
We show that intuitionistic propositional logic is Carnap categorical: the only interpretation of the connectives consistent with the intuitionistic consequence relation is the standard interpretation. This holds with respect to the most well-known semantics relative to which intuitionistic logic is sound and complete; among them Kripke semantics, Beth semantics, Dragalin semantics, topological semantics, and algebraic semantics. These facts turn out to be consequences of an observation about interpretations in Heyting algebras.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Logics
Journal of Applied Logics Mathematics-Logic
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信