对行为和组织研究中基于建议的决策的实证研究的系统回顾。

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Decision Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1037/dec0000199

Juliane E. Kämmer, Shoham Choshen-Hillel, Johannes Müller-Trede, Stephanie L. Black, Jürgen Weibler

{"title":"对行为和组织研究中基于建议的决策的实证研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Juliane E. Kämmer, Shoham Choshen-Hillel, Johannes Müller-Trede, Stephanie L. Black, Jürgen Weibler","doi":"10.1037/dec0000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted a systematic review of 143 empirical studies of advice-based decision making published in management or psychology between 2006 and 2020. We identi ﬁ ed two distinct streams of the literature. The ﬁ rst, behavioral research, features experimental research on advice-based decisions conducted in laboratories. The second, organizational research, featuresobservational ﬁ eldresearchonadvice-baseddecisionsinorganizations.Weorganized the ﬁ ndings from the two research streams around three sequential stages: advice solicitation and provision, advice utilization, and the outcomes of advice-based decisions. Our review reveals the two streams to be highly complementary — with behavioral research focusing primarily on advice utilization and organizational research focusing primarily on advice solicitation. We consolidate key ﬁ ndings across the two streams. We also identify key challenges for future research, such as greater emphasis on the social aspects of advice-based decisions and the continued development and re ﬁ nement of normative benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":43923,"journal":{"name":"Decision","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of empirical studies on advice-based decisions in behavioral and organizational research.\",\"authors\":\"Juliane E. Kämmer, Shoham Choshen-Hillel, Johannes Müller-Trede, Stephanie L. Black, Jürgen Weibler\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/dec0000199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We conducted a systematic review of 143 empirical studies of advice-based decision making published in management or psychology between 2006 and 2020. We identi ﬁ ed two distinct streams of the literature. The ﬁ rst, behavioral research, features experimental research on advice-based decisions conducted in laboratories. The second, organizational research, featuresobservational ﬁ eldresearchonadvice-baseddecisionsinorganizations.Weorganized the ﬁ ndings from the two research streams around three sequential stages: advice solicitation and provision, advice utilization, and the outcomes of advice-based decisions. Our review reveals the two streams to be highly complementary — with behavioral research focusing primarily on advice utilization and organizational research focusing primarily on advice solicitation. We consolidate key ﬁ ndings across the two streams. We also identify key challenges for future research, such as greater emphasis on the social aspects of advice-based decisions and the continued development and re ﬁ nement of normative benchmarks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A systematic review of empirical studies on advice-based decisions in behavioral and organizational research.

We conducted a systematic review of 143 empirical studies of advice-based decision making published in management or psychology between 2006 and 2020. We identi ﬁ ed two distinct streams of the literature. The ﬁ rst, behavioral research, features experimental research on advice-based decisions conducted in laboratories. The second, organizational research, featuresobservational ﬁ eldresearchonadvice-baseddecisionsinorganizations.Weorganized the ﬁ ndings from the two research streams around three sequential stages: advice solicitation and provision, advice utilization, and the outcomes of advice-based decisions. Our review reveals the two streams to be highly complementary — with behavioral research focusing primarily on advice utilization and organizational research focusing primarily on advice solicitation. We consolidate key ﬁ ndings across the two streams. We also identify key challenges for future research, such as greater emphasis on the social aspects of advice-based decisions and the continued development and re ﬁ nement of normative benchmarks.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Decision MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of the Journal, Decision, is to publish qualitative, quantitative, survey-based, simulation-based research articles at the national and sub-national levels. While there is no stated regional focus of the journal, we are more interested in examining if and how individuals, firms and governments in emerging economies may make decisions differently. Published for the management scholars, business executives and managers, the Journal aims to advance the management research by publishing empirically and theoretically grounded articles in management decision making process. The Editors aim to provide an efficient and high-quality review process to the authors. The Journal accepts submissions in several formats such as original research papers, case studies, review articles and book reviews (book reviews are only by invitation). The Journal welcomes research-based, original and insightful articles on organizational, individual, socio-economic-political, environmental decision making with relevance to theory and practice of business. It also focusses on the managerial decision-making challenges in private, public, private-public partnership and non-profit organizations. The Journal also encourages case studies that provide a rich description of the business or societal contexts in managerial decision-making process including areas – but not limited to – conflict over natural resources, product innovation and copyright laws, legislative or policy change, socio-technical embedding of financial markets, particularly in developing economy, an ethnographic understanding of relations at a workplace, or social network in marketing management, etc. Research topics covered in the Journal include (but not limited to): Finance and Accounting Organizational Theory and Behavior Decision Science Public Policy-Economic Insights Operation Management Innovation and Entrepreneurship Information Technology and Systems Management Optimization and Modelling Supply Chain Management Data Analytics Marketing Management Human Resource Management